Jump to content

Recommended Posts

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I dislike the term Troll.

> On EDF people seem to apply

> The term to anyone they dislike

> disagree with or do not understand.


Spreading false information in order to generate debate is trolling in my book, and pretty unpleasant behaviour.


So, OP = troll and I make no apologies.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I dislike the term Troll.

> > On EDF people seem to apply

> > The term to anyone they dislike

> > disagree with or do not understand.

>

> Spreading false information in order to generate

> debate is trolling in my book, and pretty

> unpleasant behaviour.

>

> So, OP = troll and I make no apologies.



It's up to people to Totally ignore such posters instead of engaging in conversation.


People calling other people Trolls always seem to me to be a desperate attempt to gain popularity

from other posters.


The school bully and his mates singling out some other child for what ever reason..


I just ignore these nuisance posters. They will go away if you don't play their game.

If you do play, you are as bad as them.


DulwichFox

There was nothing in the OP first post that was remotely offensive.


Have you actually read it. ?


I'm not going to read though the entire thread to find out where it went wrong.

I have better things to do.


But there are mixed reviews about this place. Good & Bad.


So to single out the OP as a so called Troll is a bit much.


I suspect there may of been a bit of Goading from the 'Usual Suspects' to direct

the conversation in a certain direction.


DulwichFox

No way!


It was that thread which first alerted me to your mischievous side. I remember feeling a bit sorry for the OP who was just walking in to your and MM's traps so blindly. Both you and MM PM'd me saying you couldn't resist, which was fair enough, and something I also enjoy.

aquarius moon Wrote:

-----------------------------------------------------

>

> There are no rules as such. You just have a

> connection with other members even if you've never

> met :)



I forgot one rule: Never be horrible even if you read one of their posts and feel like killing them.

Chill and love.


http://www.4smileys.com/smileys/love-smileys/groups_cuddle.gif


A trap Otta? And you all PM each other behind our backs? Shame on you. Both the guys you & Loz refer to were trying to stand up for something they believed in.


As I did.


Fortunately the main culprit has gone. It wasn't just about that thread. I found him nasty full stop.

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> A trap Otta? And you all PM each other behind our backs?


It wasn't as nefarious as it may sound - I just PM'd Otta when he posted on the thread in big red letters that a certain someone was being wound up and he was just walking straight into it. All I said was that he "knew the forum too well". Can't speak for anything MM might have PM'd to Otta, though, as I wasn't party to those.


> Both the guys you & Loz refer to were trying to stand up for something they believed in.


The one being wound up seemed more worried about shoehorning the phrase 'pompous arse' as many times into as many posts as possible that I started to suspect he was on a bet.


Anyway, all done and dusted now. I didn't even realise MM had left the forum.

Agree Loz, it's all in the past & there's no hard feelings as far as you're concerned.


I just think the PM thing is a bit sneaky because talking behind someone's back is not something I do.


I can't believe you didn't know MM had gone. He posted a goodbye thread. I was so tempted at the time to say 'good riddance' but am too nice!

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I dislike the term Troll.

> > On EDF people seem to apply

> > The term to anyone they dislike

> > disagree with or do not understand.

> >

> > Trolling is a much more serious

> > And at times sinister thing.

> >

> > DulwichFox

>

> Are you writing

> in some weird kind

> of blank verse?

>

> I ask only

> for information.



:)) :)) :))

tetris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just thought I'd revive this thread and have a dig

> at the shitty Tesco Express on E Dulwich Rd.

> It's two aisles deep and it really has nothing in

> it.


That's another thread altogether. Anyway, I never use Tesco myself.

We went to the Sea Cow for dinner on Thursday. Our previous experiences have found the fish lovely and fresh but the chips lacking. This time, the chips were lacking and the fish was small, dry and overlooked. In particular, my sons goujons were inedible. They were rock solid with overcooked breadcrumbs on the outside and dry fish on the inside. I asked for the chips to be crispy but they were as pale as usual. The service by the young, uninterested waitress was bordering on rude. It calls itself a fish and chip shop but is failing on both now. They've clearly spent some money recently on the decor and new chairs and tables when clearly what is not working is the food. You need to fix that first and foremost. Sorry, but for us, that will be our last visit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://www.facebook.com/labourparty/posts/when-your-family-and-friends-ask-you-what-labour-has-achieved-so-far-send-them-t/1090481149116565/    Do you mean going from rhyming with Message to rhyming with Massage?  Or was it really a hard g to start with, rhyming, say,  with Farague/Faraig or Fararg?
    • Why on earth is there so much interest, and negativity, after a 100 days of a Labour government when we had 1000s of days of dreadful government before this with hardly a chat on this Website?  What is it that is suddenly so much greater interest? Here's part of a list of what they have done in a 100 days - it's from a Labour MP so obviously there is some bias, and mainly new Bills so yet to deliver/put into law.  This reminds me of the US election where the popular view was that Biden had achieved nothing, rather than leading the recovery after Covid, a fairer tax system, housing, supporting workers, dealing with community unrest following high profile racist incidents,  So if we think Starmer is ineffective and Labour incompetent then we are all going to believe it? I do feel sick after seeing Clarkson on Newsnight, playing to the gallery.  Surely Trump must have a high profile role for him on the environment and climate change  
    • Hi looking for a shed for my allotment. Can pick up
    • But do you not understand how tough farming is, especially post-Brexit when some of the subsidies were lost and costs have increased massively yet the prices farmers can charge has not? On the BBC News tonight they said pig farming costs had gone up 54% since 2019, cow farming costs up 44% and cereal costs up 43%. The NFU said that the margins are on average 0.5% return on capital. Land and buildings are assets that don't make money until you sell them...it's what you do with them that makes money and farms are struggling to make money and so many farms are generational family businesses so never realise the assets (one farmers on the news said his farm had been in the family since 1822) but will have to to pay tax for continuing the family business. On another news item tonight there was a short piece saying the government has said that 50,000 more pensioners will be forced into relative poverty (60% of the average income) due to the Winter Fuel Allowance removal which will rise to 100,000 more by 2027. James Murray from the Treasury was rolled out on Newsnight to try and defend that and couldn't. You can't give doctors 20%+ and push more pensioners into poverty as a result.  The problem for Labour is the court of public opinion will judge them and right now the jury is out after a series of own-goals, really poor communication and ill-thought-out idealogical policies. And don't ever annoy the farmers.....;-)  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...