Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ellem86 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unless I've missed something, OP didn't say the

> bad tenants were DSS


I was assuming from experience - E. Dulwich is expensive to rent and the people who can afford it might have slightly loud alcholic tea-parties, but otherwise nothing describing OPs problems. But I'm derailing the convo.... carry on

Unfortunately I don't think there is much you can do. You can report them to the police, but unless their music is loud and aggressive late into the night, and you have some definite proof they are taking drugs even the police can't do much. They can't enter a premises on the basis of drugs without a warrant.


Have you tried approaching their landlord directly?

Tetris... what an insulting stereotypical response..if there "bad drug taking neighbours" then they have to be dss tenants.!! .couldn't possibly be anything else.

It's that sort of attitude that makes it hard for people who,for whatever reasons,have to try and find a decent place to live whilst on benefits.

My gran had a lot of very nice helpful young people living next door to her and she was a plant lover. They went on holiday and asked her to look after their pot plants which she put on her balcony..and they literally were 'pot' plants and she didn't know (until I visited her and she's saying 'oh look at these lovely plants, aren't the leaves attractive' and so on.....)

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My gran had a lot of very nice helpful young

> people living next door to her and she was a plant

> lover. They went on holiday and asked her to look

> after their pot plants which she put on her

> balcony..and they literally were 'pot' plants and

> she didn't know (until I visited her and she's

> saying 'oh look at these lovely plants, aren't the

> leaves attractive' and so on.....)


Then you had a little smoke together, right?


That would be a perfect story ending




On the original OP. I had something similar, so contacted the landlord direct. It worked out ok in the end

  • 1 month later...

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This thread is a no brainer.

>

> If they are doing illegal things report them to

> the police

> If they are making excessive noise report to

> Environmental Health

> If they aren't doing either, speak to your local

> coucillor about what can or can't be done.


Thanks for the best laugh of the day with that one! No brainer indeed.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This thread is a no brainer.

>

> If they are doing illegal things report them to

> the police

> If they are making excessive noise report to

> Environmental Health

> If they aren't doing either, speak to your local

> coucillor about what can or can't be done.


Yes, no brainer, agreed to all the above. But before going to the local councillor, you need to speak to the landlord, as the tenancy may have info about what is/isn't acceptable.


Also agreed with others, re drug-taking alone is not necessarily anti-social behaviour. However, if there are minors living in the property, and you strongly suspect that they are being put in jeopardy, then you should report it to social services or the police.


In your complaints/enquiries for further info, you need to be able to document specific behaviours that have led to anti-social outcomes on multiple occasion over a period of time.


From your post, it's not clear what you mean by "anti-social", so if it's just noise, I tend to agree with Otta that you should just talk to them. If they've been aggressive towards you, then you need to document it. A witness would help.


Good luck. xx

Jules6862 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tetris... what an insulting stereotypical

> response..if there "bad drug taking neighbours"

> then they have to be dss tenants.!! .couldn't

> possibly be anything else.

> It's that sort of attitude that makes it hard for

> people who,for whatever reasons,have to try and

> find a decent place to live whilst on benefits.


Whilst Alcohol is acceptable (even encouraged) employers

and vetters hate any form of illegal drug. (I understand

why a lot of people think that's unfair)


it is just a huge no no with them if they even suspect.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Farmers groups say 35% of farms will be affected while the Treasury reckons its 27% - neither figure is a tiny portion. The problem is farming is often asset rich but cash poor meaning that those who inherit farms and have to pay the tax will likely need to sell land to pay for it and could well further impact the cash poor nature and productivity of that farm. I would have thought those who align on the left would be welcoming farmers protesting on the streets against a government making their lives more difficult. Good on them. Makes a change from tube and rail strikes at least! I was shocked to read that the average weekly earnings for agricultural workers was significantly lower than the national average.  Clearly Labour doesn't consider these working people.
    • A tax change that affects a tiny portion of farmers livelihoods and income - mass protest and wild accusations on forums like this    Brexit which impacted farmers income and uk food security far far far more ? Crickets. Absolutely nothing. “Price worth paying mate “   Don’t  be fooled about what this is about - it’s isn’t IHT.  
    • In deed, doesn't matter if he is a talented presenter he is, in my view, an rrrrrrsss.  Interestingly Farage was pronounced with a hard g.  But he affected the continental soft g.  Similar to the UK and US pronunciations of garage.  I've worked with people who were at school with him
    • Doesn’t seem that simple   according to fullfact that’s a net figure   ” The £21.9 billion was a net figure. Gross additional pressures totalling £35.3 billion were identified by the Treasury, and approximately £13.4 billion of these pressures were then offset by a combination of reserve funds and other allowances. The additional pressures identified were as follows: 2024-25 public sector pay awards (£9.4bn) ”   I don’t think Labour have set expectation that changing government cures all the ills. In fact some people on here criticise them for saying exactly opposite “vote for us we’re not them but nothing will change because global issues”   I think they are too cautious across many areas. They could have been more explicit before election but such is the countries media and electorate that if they were we would now be stuck with sunak/badenoch/someone else with the 14 years of baggage of their government and infighting  the broad strokes of this government are essentially along right lines  also loving ckarkson today “ Clarkson: Your claim that I bought a farm to avoid taxes is false and irresponsible.  BBC: It’s your own claim.  Clarkson: What’s that got to do with anything?” and by loving I mean “loathing as much as I ever have”    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...