Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Basically just founding members feeling the need

> to feel a bit special and claim a slice of the

> place. Bless.


And in return there is a significant discount going forward on tickets and "refreshments".....I expect my wife and I will achieve ?95 of discounts over time. Its good marketing and a good deal for both parties.


I think its a brilliant idea.

But sorry admin, hadn't seen your post.


But all I was trying to do was stick up for someone who had been labelled negative without saying a single negative thing about the new cinema.


For my part I am happy there is a cinema and hope to use it occasionally. But opportunities will be very limited, so membership would have been a pointless excersise for me.

I joined up as soon as possible, as there was no way I wasn't going to end up being a member when it's 5 minutes from my front door and it was never going to be any cheaper. I can see how some of more silly 'statusy' stuff around getting your name on the wall etc could be considered a bit cringey, but that aside, it was a no brainer to take the 'early bird deal'. Anyway, it's a great cinema, loads of leg room, which as a lanky fooker, is great for me.

Help-Ma-Boab Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I poked ma nose in on Saturday. Looks good. Im not

> a member, ooze charm me!


I'm a longtime Ritzy fan and a PH member in Brixton but I don't have your special "gift" of getting into just about anywhere HMB? so I was reduced to peering through the windows at the founder members inside. Level playing field from Thursday though?and I plan to be one of 4000 parent/baby combos trying for one of the 25 tickets for the Big Scream Club

I love what i've seen so far of our new cinema but for one bugbear - i really really wish it wasn't an 0871 number. I find those so unpleasant and unfriendly. i think i have already spent whatever i might have saved by joining as a member just by sitting on their phone waiting for them to answer (?12!) and it's going to be the same when it comes to booking films granted that shouldn't involve as many attempts at trying to get through - or as long a wait - but it will involve a booking fee on top. Both charges seems excessive?

OliviaDee Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> it's not set up yet but there will still be a

> ?1.50 booking fee for online bookings (unless you

> are a member) and ?1.50 over the phone plus

> whatever you are charged calling an 0871 box

> office number.


It is setup. I booked two tickets yesterday.

My visit to the cinema on Saturday left me impressed with the venue, but I'm not impressed with the 0871 number (even as a member), especially when the money that make from that would certainly be enough to help pay a London living wage to the staff. So, happy it is open, would be happier if they did the decent thing for their staff.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cinemas charging booking fees = complete

> piss-take. Especially when online booking is

> obviously expected to be the norm.


I disagree Jeremy. The telephone systems, website, infrastructure to allow people to book tickets without having to actually be at the cinema has a decent cost to running it and they'll need to recoup that somehow in their business model or not offer it at all.


So I think a charge is reasonable....but for some reason ?1.50 feels a bit steep....

?1.50 a ticket is surely too much. In fact online bookings often work in the cinema's favour. No need for ticket kiosks and foyers big enough to accomodate the queues. They can use the space for bar/cafe/confectionary instead.


But of course Mick Mac is right... it's wrong to single out the Picturehouse (or even the cinema industry). It's a standard rip-off tactic.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Farage, like most of its pupils, wasn't a boarder.
    • n addition to this, the house has suspected drainage issues and a leaking incoming water main. The owner is aware of these problems but has been unable to carry out repairs—likely because Thames Water has not cooperated. Drainage issues are a nightmare for any buyer, and although the water main leak is less serious, it is still time-consuming to resolve with Thames Water.   Many houses in london have shared drains. Ours runs along the back of the block of houses to a near by road as a shared drain it is the sole responsibility of TW to fix it. They will do this if you get heavy with them. If the house you are buying is like this, the current owners need to make TW fix it. You need a better explanation not just "TW not co-operating", why haven't they been legally forced to co-operated. Sounds very 0dd indeed. I would not trust them. I am with Sue and CPR Dave
    • We sold a house with subsidence providing all the paper trail and narrative upfront.  The list price was a slight discount to similar properties without subsidence issues and we got a few offers.  That's the way to do it. Be nice to the estate agent.  Try to find out how desperate the vendor is to sell.  If they're desperate and you factor in a subsidence AND a substantial dishonesty discount compared to similar properties there might still be an opportunity but seems unlikely.  
    • What Sue said, I would walk, no run, away from this purchase.  It sounds like they have completely misled you as to the position with the subsidence and let you spend money on lawyers finding out the truth. I would not transact with such people.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...