Jump to content

Recommended Posts

ZT this isn't a delayed commuter train, it's a cinema. In a really old building that likely presented huge challenges along the way. I fail to see how their email treated anyone like children. Why do we need to know the ins and outs of the delays? It's not a public service, it's a privately operated cinema. When it opens we'll all go. You think they have any interest in not opening at the very first opportunity?
It's the tone of the email that I find patronising. Possibly not as patronising as the previous email when they "blamed" Santa Claus for the fact that they missed their Xmas deadline! If you're happy with that style of email, fine, but personally I think that it's an example of the tone of so much communication these days.
Fun, slightly irreverent, reassuring.. a light-hearted, mild Alice in Wonderland reference? Definitely fire their Comms team immediately. They're not issuing a white paper, they're handling an unfortunate and unintentional delay with good humour and communicating with a modern audience. This is how all successful companies handle problems these days. What were you hoping for, the CEO kneeling in the street and begging for forgiveness?
You can bet that behind the scenes, management will be furious at the delay. But I guess they thought it best to keep communication informal/casual in line with brand image. But I don't think they have anything to apologise for, they don't owe us anything.
More time for the Blow ins to start forming a 'look at me' queue. Maybe it'll merge with the one for the Butchers and the posh cheese on toast place - Lordship lane gridlocked with ironic hair, push chairs and discarded Guardian media supplements.

Real_Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> More time for the Blow ins to start forming a

> 'look at me' queue. Maybe it'll merge with the one

> for the Butchers and the posh cheese on toast

> place - Lordship lane gridlocked with ironic hair,

> push chairs and discarded Guardian media

> supplements



Haha!

Hoopoedi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What or who exactly constitutes a "blow in"? Or

> is this a subject for another thread? I'm

> curious...


Basically anyone who wasn't born in the postcode where they now live. People who've had the temerity to do something with their lives, move around a bit, experience stuff, gain a bit of outlook. They're MASSIVELY annoying.

  • 4 weeks later...

It's a friggin cinema in an old building


Wow it's taken longer than the abstract calculation anticipated


Lighten up, no one's died


I suggest reading the email outloud using a Darth Vader voice modulator device


Or try impersonating Steven Hawkins or Arsene Wenger

In other news - while we're waiting - a clutch of the new Conrad Shawcross sculptures have landed in Dulwich Park.


I quite like the rusty look of them but earlier photos suggest they'll be 'finished' in some way.


That should keep us busy until the flicks opens.


ETA: started a separate thread for this - don't want to get our visual arts in a muddle.

fonread Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hoopoedi Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What or who exactly constitutes a "blow in"?

> Or

> > is this a subject for another thread? I'm

> > curious...

>

> Basically anyone who wasn't born in the postcode

> where they now live. People who've had the

> temerity to do something with their lives, move

> around a bit, experience stuff, gain a bit of

> outlook. They're MASSIVELY annoying.


So despite the fact that I was born and raised in South London and have spent a very large part of my life in South London, that I worked in South London and also did voluntary work in Dulwich and that I have actually been living in East Dulwich since early 1987, I am a blow in.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Don't think I know anyone in a £2m house, so on a personal level irrelevant. However on a related matter there does need to be reform of Council Tax as many around here have done large extensions but still being charged the same as some who are in properties which have not been touched. It would be better to discuss the budget as a whole.  Off to do some research on issues that matter to me, sustainable transport, climate change and the like.
    • "High Value Council Tax Surcharge – The government will introduce the High Value Council Tax Surcharge a new charge on owners of residential property in England worth £2 million or more, starting in 2028-29. Local authorities will collect this revenue on behalf of central government. Revenue will be used to support funding for local government services, with further detail to be set out at the next spending review. The government will consult on implementation of HVCTS in the new year." https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/budget-2025-document/budget-2025-html#policy-decisions, which shows (Section 5.1, item 54) a projected revenue of £400m in the first year.
    • According to that previous thread, there won't be any Christmas tree sellers on Goose Green this year, as the council agreed not to allow it again.
    • You're joking, right?  The 'mansion tax' only kicks in at £2m, at which point it's a mere £2,500 per year.  Houses like that have gained £00's of thousands in recent years, completely free of capital gains tax.  The people who can afford £2m houses have either (a) lived in them for decades, in which case it's almost entirely unearned wealth, or (b) bought recently on a combination of huge salary [out of which £2.5k is peanuts], or (c) on the back of a huge inheritance (more unearned income).   Income tax penalises the workers, wealth tax penalises those who in many cases have landed a large part of this huge wealth without lifting a finger. (As a long term ED resident I count myself in this latter category, by the way - my house is now worth about 10x what I paid for it, my income has maybe doubled in that time). My heart does NOT bleed for those many elderly couples sitting in multi-million pound houses on Burbage Road - homes that were built with big Victorian families in mind - who might have to fork out £5k more per year for the privilege.  If this really does pinch them financially then perhaps it is time to trade down to the "squalor" of a million pound house or luxury apartment in East Dulwich.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...