Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am absolutely sick to the back teeth of all this facebook "check in" milarchy. Losers with time on their hands telling the world where they are shopping eating or taking a number two! Who gives a f@&k? Some of the most patronising ones are the posh indy restaurants. Get a friggin life and stop showing off and patronising your friends/family/work colleagues. You look like an idiot! Rant over.


Louisa.

I don't use facebook for this very reason! It's a bizarre concept. Making online friendships and sharing your daily activities with these strangers over a social media outlet. My husband uses this and left it on earlier and I noticed all these "check-ins" many of them from family members and friends of ours in places around the area going back as far as October 2012! Ridiculous. Some people are so sad. I don't care if you read this either Jane, there I've said it!


Louisa.

10/10


Well done!


You got a rant in about FB check-ins with a tenuous link to East Dulwich. Which 'posh, indy' restaurants are you referring to anyway? You do realise that not all friendships will be 'online' ones so its not necessarily a case of sharing your daily activities with strangers. Let's take 'Jane' as an example...

As much as I want to divulge the restaurant names it will give it away if I do - plus it's unfair on those businesses. Let's just say they are on LL, recent and aimed at blow-ins. I understand they're not all strangers, but I often imagine people like my husband who sees the good in everyone stupidly gets fooled into seeing and "liking" these "check-in" statuses further inflating the ego of the attention seeking "friends" even more. Just because you choose to eat in this reataurant and rub it in my face doesn't make you any better than me. It's overpriced crap anyway so good luck to you for wasting your bloody money in there. I'm furious.


Louisa.

Ah, I see. Those blow-ins flaunting their wealth whilst out and about on the Lane on a Saturday eve. How dare they?

I expect the poor fools are wasting their money on what can only be described as glorified CoT or overpriced burgers.


Have a large glass of ros?. Am sure that Iceland have some excellent deals on Blossom Hill at the moment!

I'm already two bottles down numbers, a fine few bottles of Sauvignon from the co-op that was on offer. Some people make me so angry and once I've had a drink I just can't contain myself. I'll regret this tomorrow but oh well. If only it were just posh burgers or fancy tapas. It's much much more extravegant than that and this person knows damn well what pushes my buttons. Well let me tell you Mrs, I'm rather happy and cosy sat at home in my onesie eating milk tray and sipping on a nice white. You enjoy your poached quails eggs on focaccia! B#%ch!


Louisa.

There are some nauseating ones. I've tried to erase from my mind a check-in that popped up in my timeline recently, 'jacuzzi at home with hubby & bubbly'. On Valentine's Day.


Complete with photo of said bath & (dare I say it), rather tasteless champagne flutes.

My biggest regret is not being one of the few who steadfastly refused to have a FB account. I can't properly delete the sucker and now my personal details, photos and personal family network are digitally embedded in NSA annals forever. It's the biggest privacy to live away since man began walking the earth.

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My biggest regret is not being one of the few who

> steadfastly refused to have a FB account. I can't

> properly delete the sucker and now my personal

> details, photos and personal family network are

> digitally embedded in NSA annals forever.


I know what you mean. I too was foolish. I put that picture of me wearing a silly hat and my check-in at Budgens directly into the hands of a foreign security force - and now I must live with the consequences.


Is that a van with a revolving roofrack outside my house?

Dearest Louisa, I am mostly confused, in one post you state


"I am absolutely sick to the back teeth of all this facebook "check in" milarchy."


Yet a very short while later you post


Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't use facebook for this very reason! It's a

> bizarre concept. Making online friendships and

> sharing your daily activities with these strangers

> over a social media outlet. My husband uses this

> and left it on earlier and I noticed all these

> "check-ins"


So you don't use facebook, therefore it doesn't impact on your daily life but you aren't averse to snooping on your husbands use of facebook like a jealous stalker checking up on his social life which then makes your blood boil. Best leave alone so that you don't get annoyed by something that doesn't affect you.


If I may can I provide these words of wisdom to Mr Louisa "Run before she starts boiling the pet bunny" :-(

Frankito I must admit after a shower and a look back at yet another night of drinking myself to the kebab shop at gone 2 in the morning, I realise that over emphasis on a specific friend is possibly a step too far. She does read my forum updates but she wouldn't know how to post (fingers crossed). Jane I won't apologise, but you can come over for a cheeky bottle of Pinot this afternoon.


ArtfulDodger Mr Louisa is fully equipped to deal with my spouts of alcohol fuelled jealousy, on occasion. I don't make a regular habit of checking his facebook but it was in front of me on the laptop, and foolishly I decided to read a certain friends status knowing full well she would be trying to rub my nose in it. But it's just banter, no harm done, she can share my bottle if it helps. And as for Mr Louisa, he can see me naked tanning in the garden come June im sure that's better than apology ;-)


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://www.facebook.com/labourparty/posts/when-your-family-and-friends-ask-you-what-labour-has-achieved-so-far-send-them-t/1090481149116565/    Do you mean going from rhyming with Message to rhyming with Massage?  Or was it really a hard g to start with, rhyming, say,  with Farague/Faraig or Fararg?
    • Why on earth is there so much interest, and negativity, after a 100 days of a Labour government when we had 1000s of days of dreadful government before this with hardly a chat on this Website?  What is it that is suddenly so much greater interest? Here's part of a list of what they have done in a 100 days - it's from a Labour MP so obviously there is some bias, and mainly new Bills so yet to deliver/put into law.  This reminds me of the US election where the popular view was that Biden had achieved nothing, rather than leading the recovery after Covid, a fairer tax system, housing, supporting workers, dealing with community unrest following high profile racist incidents,  So if we think Starmer is ineffective and Labour incompetent then we are all going to believe it? I do feel sick after seeing Clarkson on Newsnight, playing to the gallery.  Surely Trump must have a high profile role for him on the environment and climate change  
    • Hi looking for a shed for my allotment. Can pick up
    • But do you not understand how tough farming is, especially post-Brexit when some of the subsidies were lost and costs have increased massively yet the prices farmers can charge has not? On the BBC News tonight they said pig farming costs had gone up 54% since 2019, cow farming costs up 44% and cereal costs up 43%. The NFU said that the margins are on average 0.5% return on capital. Land and buildings are assets that don't make money until you sell them...it's what you do with them that makes money and farms are struggling to make money and so many farms are generational family businesses so never realise the assets (one farmers on the news said his farm had been in the family since 1822) but will have to to pay tax for continuing the family business. On another news item tonight there was a short piece saying the government has said that 50,000 more pensioners will be forced into relative poverty (60% of the average income) due to the Winter Fuel Allowance removal which will rise to 100,000 more by 2027. James Murray from the Treasury was rolled out on Newsnight to try and defend that and couldn't. You can't give doctors 20%+ and push more pensioners into poverty as a result.  The problem for Labour is the court of public opinion will judge them and right now the jury is out after a series of own-goals, really poor communication and ill-thought-out idealogical policies. And don't ever annoy the farmers.....;-)  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...