Jump to content

The Patch/the Mag/The Lordship


PandG

Recommended Posts

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Er..I think you two have form elsewhere...any

> chance you gals could take this spat elsewhere or

> onto PM. You're not doing the Lordship any

> favours, nit anyone reading this for info nor

> yourselves for that matter.


Quite right MrBen. I wish The Lordship every success...

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Er..I think you two have form elsewhere...any

> chance you gals could take this spat elsewhere or

> onto PM. You're not doing the Lordship any

> favours, nit anyone reading this for info nor

> yourselves for that matter.



I have no idea who speedbird is, and I'm not aware that we "have form elsewhere", unless speedbird also posts/has posted under other names.


I completely agree that this thread (or indeed any others) isn't an appropriate place to make personal comments about other posters, but if somebody makes one about me you can't expect me not to respond, surely?


Hey ho. Plus ca change.

Went last night with some mates for food. Nice nice friendly feel and was full come 8.30pm at bar and tables at the back. Good straight up pub food and service beer at reasonable prices and they've taken away the bar stools....a small but tactical move for the better.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I miss bar stools.


I like the choice.. Most of the time I stand.. The EDT has so many you can't get near the bar

and I end up moving them out of the way.


.. Sometimes when I have filled my legs with ale, I feel the need to sit down.


Foxy

And the degree of self awareness they have when others want access to the bit of the bar that they think they own...



MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The thing with bar stools...is it depends who's

> sitting on them.

We went early Saturday evening for some food and we were impressed. The food was delicious, good choice of options and prices seemed reasonable. Service was very, very good: helpful, friendly, personable, just as you'd like.

Overall, it wasn't too busy (although all the tables in the bar area were taken) but that was probably also because we left before 8pm (we had a little one with us).

Looking forward to the next visit!

  • 3 weeks later...

A bit of a Jekyll and Hyde experience.


First visit - epic food and service, good value for the quality.


Second visit - ordered wine/food within 10 mins of arriving. Forty mins later, no food. After polite discussion with charming waitress, who couldn't get an answer from the kitchen, we spoke to manager. A shrugging of shoulders, a vague apology, but absolutely no indication of how much longer our food might be. We paid for our bottle of wine and left with it.


If we had been told there was an hour's wait for food at the beginning, we would never have sat down. I do hope complacency, matched with pressure for maximum bums on seats, isn't setting in. Otherwise they might end up going the same way as the four previous incarnations at this tricky spot.

Haven't eaten there and not really my choice of eatery with tables in the middle of the floor

and out of my price range...


.. but for those who choose to support a new local business it would seem not too much to ask

for a little more consistency. With people recommending the place and others being left disappointed

and frustrated.


They really should of been able to sort themselves out by now, or at the very least show a little more

concern about the level of service they seem to be providing.


Perhaps some complimentary drinks when customers are kept waiting.


With the suggestion that the place would make an excellent venue for a pre Cinema meal, that's not

such a good idea if you are going to miss the film due to being delayed.


DulwichFox

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • Sent you a pm
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...