Jump to content

Service Charge Major Works - Dylways


TSay

Recommended Posts

Are there any leaseholders from Dylways on this forum? Specifically leaseholders from street properties on Dylways? As some of you may be aware, major works were carried out last year to these properties involving minimal roof repairs, very superficial brick refacing and unnecessary guttering replacement. Each leaseholder on my block has been charged roughly ?8200 and the total for our block of four is ?32800. Has anyone challenged this charge or had any positive response from the Home Ownership Unit?


These works seem very overpriced compared to the window replacement carried out in 2006. Furthermore, the Home Ownership Unit have stated that they believe the ?7000 charged for scaffolding is accurate and will not not drop on final account. Has anyone else challenged this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all extortionate to be honest but the work they have carried out is so minimal that I can't see how they can justify the costs. They quoted ?4500 to apply water proof masonry cream. When I researched the cost of the product and area coverage per 10L the cost for this was revised to ?350 but the overall estimate figure remained the same, as the difference in amount was moved to a different category - "general brickwork repairs."


Is there no way to report the Home Ownership Unit to an external auditor? I think there are huge discrepancies in their figures and this has been my experience over the last eleven years. Yes, I too regret purchasing an ex-council property.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately this has already gone to the First-Tier Tribunal and they ruled in favour of Southwark Council. I am in the process of appealing. Despite numerous lies from the contractor and poor quality brick repairs, which the tribunal panel acknowledged on inspection, the estimate was deemed reasonable. The only course of action I have now is to appeal or apply once again on final account. Southwark Home Ownership Unit is getting away with legalised extortion. Does anyone have links to the media/press, as this problem needs to be highlighted. Something is very wrong and no one seems to care.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yet another reason why all supermarkets should be thrown down the pit. Along with all their lies and horrid carparks. And their disgraceful treatment and terrible conditioning of their underpaid slaves. And their horrible antisocial robots who no one can even talk to, which also make their slaves even cheaper. Get rid.   X
    • What are our rights here? An item on the shelf has a price tag and next to it a discounted price if you have a club loyalty card or whatever, the expiry date for the offer is a few days in the future. Clearly you expect to be charged the discounted price because you have a loyalty card. You get to the staffed till, scan your card but the discount for the item in question has not been honoured and you've been charged full price. You tell the staff member but they go ignorant and insist the price is the full price without the discount. You go to point out the label on the shelf but they just ignore it. It was traditional to be charged the price shown on the shelf regardless and then up to the shop to correct it there and then, they don't do that now they just call you a liar. I made a complaint online and was told it was not a staff issue, staff are employed as robots nowadays and self-appointed security guards especially in the express stores. I was told next time to go detective and take photos of all the evidence so feedback can be sent to management. That's more work that what the discount is, what a joke.
    • To me, it seems the survey asks questions about ease of understanding of the SPD rather than consulting the public on opinions on the content... What's the best way of objecting to this change in guidelines? Anyone who has been to any of the consultation events and can provide an update on this?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...