Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Had an argument tonight with the bar staff at the Rose pub close to Vauxhall Bridge. Nay my good barman, you have keyed in a pint rather than a half. No dear sur, this really is ?9.80 a pint. "You should have consulted the menu and you would have seen this" It was for a blonde beer on tap. My regular readers will understand that I don't go for all this new-fangled beer but even some of the 'craft' (whatever that means) beer sold at your trendy places wont reach these prices. I left without paying, telling them by law they had to have prices prominantly displayed. Sadly I found out that these regs have been watered down so no moaning to Southwark Trading Standards for me.


Can anyone beat ?9.80 for a beer on tap? I think that you pay these sort of prices in basement bars in Soho, but a hostess (or host) is usually thrown in. In the UK please, although even in Norway I imagine that you would be pushed to pay so much.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/54342-most-expensive-pint-ever/
Share on other sites

Yes - at The Cask in Pimlico, Tap East at Stratford and a few others that sell craft beers, I've seen beers at over ?12 a pint. They tend to be really high ABV brews so are intended to be drunk in 1/3s or 1/2s. The bar staff are generally pretty good at advising pre-pouring though. The opposite also tends to be true though - that lighter session beers tend to be cheaper.

Never paid that much, but I think I was charged around ?7 for a pint of normal strength pale ale type stuff at The Rake. And a similar amount for a limited edition Sierra Nevada beer at the Flying Pig.


Always happy to pay a little bit extra for a nice craft beer or belgian beer, but once you get to ?6ish, I start to wonder whether I'd still be enjoying myself just as much with a pint of something cheaper in my hand.

Re. David_carnel


1 Imperial pint = 568.261485 millilitres


1 millilitre = 0.00175975326 Imperial pints


330mL = 0.58 pints


0.58 pint = 6.00


58 = 600


1 Pint = ?10.34


Cheaper than ?14.00 but still expensive...


I think the Draft House had beers dearer than that...


DulwichFox

The term "Craft beer" makes me want to hit something.


Nothing against the actual products, just the name.


I wouldn't spend over ?6 on a pint, and if I did spend ?6 I'd expect that pint to be pretty bloody special.


Beer revolution is cheaper than your average pub, and their beers are great. It's about honest pricing.

The good stuff doesn't have to be expensive... Late Knights/Beer Rebellion is not expensive, Stormbird in Camberwell has reasonable prices, as does The Ivy House. I can see why the imported American beers could work out expensive, but surely regular strength domestic beers shouldn't really be over ?5 a pint.

This from Late Knights most recent blog (which was written new years eve)


"The next pub we will be doing is the Alexandra in Penge. We get lots of people begging us for news about this pub, and the repeated line from us has always been 'we are waiting for planning permission to come through' That is the case.


Hopefully is we get it granted in early Jan we will be 3 months away from opening. There is a lot of work to do here and we are silly excited by it. We will be doing lots of amazing food and selling bucket loads of our own beer, it really will be a Penge pub for a Penge brewery!"




Make it so!!!

@jeremy The Rake can catch you out if you are not careful! These days they tend to tell you if it's going to make your eyes water before they start pouring.


I bought my most expensive beer ever at the weekend, the Horizon Tokyo Black. ?16 for a 25cl bottle. Best imperial russian stout I've ever had though, possibly the best beer. That works out at ?48 for a wine bottle size!

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Re. David_carnel

>

> 1 Imperial pint = 568.261485 millilitres

>

> 1 millilitre = 0.00175975326 Imperial pints

>

> 330mL = 0.58 pints

>

> 0.58 pint = 6.00

>

> 58 = 600

>

> 1 Pint = ?10.34

>

> Cheaper than ?14.00 but still expensive...

>

> I think the Draft House had beers dearer than

> that...

>

> DulwichFox


Yeah....thanks for that.

rodneybewes Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> @jeremy The Rake can catch you out if you are not careful!


Afterwards had a couple of pints of cask ale... an Oakham and a Thornbridge I think... for a very reasonable price, so it balanced out. But.... I just prefer keg beer. Don't know why it seems to be so much more expensive.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rodneybewes Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > @jeremy The Rake can catch you out if you are

> not careful!

>

> Afterwards had a couple of pints of cask ale... an

> Oakham and a Thornbridge I think... for a very

> reasonable price, so it balanced out. But.... I

> just prefer keg beer. Don't know why it seems to

> be so much more expensive.



Agreed. That's the joy of The Rake. You can admire the super-beers from around the world but you always have a reasonably priced session ale to fall back on.

I understand that there can be a premium on beer, wine or any commodity. Or that upmarket placers charge more


On the odd occasion the Rake expecting to be shafted I am pleasantly surprised that the have a reasonably priced ale on.


In my pub we have that fizzy cold nonsense that the hipsters drink but we have the prices properly displayed, I have told the management we have too many beers on.


I was just stunned that a 'normal' looking tap would have such a high price tag. Anyway some good postings

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://www.facebook.com/labourparty/posts/when-your-family-and-friends-ask-you-what-labour-has-achieved-so-far-send-them-t/1090481149116565/    Do you mean going from rhyming with Message to rhyming with Massage?  Or was it really a hard g to start with, rhyming, say,  with Vague?
    • Why on earth is there so much interest, and negativity, after a 100 days of a Labour government when we had 1000s of days of dreadful government before this with hardly a chat on this Website?  What is it that is suddenly so much greater interest? Here's part of a list of what they have done in a 100 days - it's from a Labour MP so obviously there is some bias, and mainly new Bills so yet to deliver/put into law.  This reminds me of the US election where the popular view was that Biden had achieved nothing, rather than leading the recovery after Covid, a fairer tax system, housing, supporting workers, dealing with community unrest following high profile racist incidents,  So if we think Starmer is ineffective and Labour incompetent then we are all going to believe it? I do feel sick after seeing Clarkson on Newsnight, playing to the gallery.  Surely Trump must have a high profile role for him on the environment and climate change  
    • Hi looking for a shed for my allotment. Can pick up
    • But do you not understand how tough farming is, especially post-Brexit when some of the subsidies were lost and costs have increased massively yet the prices farmers can charge has not? On the BBC News tonight they said pig farming costs had gone up 54% since 2019, cow farming costs up 44% and cereal costs up 43%. The NFU said that the margins are on average 0.5% return on capital. Land and buildings are assets that don't make money until you sell them...it's what you do with them that makes money and farms are struggling to make money and so many farms are generational family businesses so never realise the assets (one farmers on the news said his farm had been in the family since 1822) but will have to to pay tax for continuing the family business. On another news item tonight there was a short piece saying the government has said that 50,000 more pensioners will be forced into relative poverty (60% of the average income) due to the Winter Fuel Allowance removal which will rise to 100,000 more by 2027. James Murray from the Treasury was rolled out on Newsnight to try and defend that and couldn't. You can't give doctors 20%+ and push more pensioners into poverty as a result.  The problem for Labour is the court of public opinion will judge them and right now the jury is out after a series of own-goals, really poor communication and ill-thought-out idealogical policies. And don't ever annoy the farmers.....;-)  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...