Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I m thinking to remortgage my first and only house in order to invest in a second propriety.

My broker does it very simple in theory to remortgage the house, cash in some equity in order to use it as deposit for a second house..

He (my broker) doesn t say much though about taxes I might need to pay on the equity i cash in..

Do i need to pay taxes on my remortgage once i cash in the equity money???



thanx

Better off reading up on the HMRC web site to make sure (it's surprisingly clear for a government website) but if your first and only house is the one you live in, I don't think you should be liable for tax on any equity you release to invest in a new property - you aren't really selling it anyway, just increasing the loan against it.


You would have to declare the income from renting out that second house to the taxman(think you can offset the mortgage interest against the rent as well as various other expenses) and if you sold that investment property you would be liable for capital gains tax (assuming it had gone up in value).


https://www.gov.uk/tax-sell-property/what-you-pay-it-on

There is no tax to be paid on releasing equity, be the house you primary residence or otherwise. You will need to pay stamp duty on the new house plus, as Indiepanda say, declare the rental income (plus keep tabs on all expenditure as you can claim against them).


If you are worried, ask a tax advisor. I found Ray Coman at Coman & Co on Upland Road incredibly helpful.

If you are not selling any part of your existing home you are not actually 'releasing equity'. You are simply using your house as collateral to raise a loan, which is by way of a mortgage. So there is no tax to pay. The tax only comes about when you earn some money, either by renting your new house, or by capital gain when you sell it.

The tax problem you may want to investigate is whether you will be able to set any of the rental income against the mortgage interest, if the mortgage is on another property.

The tax problem you may want to investigate is whether you will be able to set any of the rental income against the mortgage interest, if the mortgage is on another property.


You can claim the interest on mortgages that are for properties that are let (or empty and available to let). So if you own three properties with mortgages, let two of them and live in one, you can claim on your tax the interest for the two let property mortgages only. This is why most people crank up BTL mortgages as high as possible and pay their primary residence mortgage down as far as possible.


Income and costs are treated as one lump (i.e. not itemised per property), so you are taxed on [total of your rental income - total of your interest/expenses].

Loz did a great job answering - thanks. That's what I presumed, that you can claim for the interest on the mortgages for the let properties only, i.e. a re-mortgage on the existing house wouldn't comply. I don't have any buy to let properties so I couldn't speak with certainty.

It will comply. You can get interest relief on the loan secured on your main residence (re-mortgage) if used to help purchase a rental property. It doesn't have to be a loan on the let property

http://www.accountingweb.co.uk/anyanswers/interest-purchase-second-home-tax-deductible-if-remortgage-main-residence

I'd like to learn something new. Does anyone know if there is a way round the Capital Gains issue if you have a rental and want to sell it?

For example, if you sold your main residence and then moved into the rental, thus becoming your new main residence, how long would you have to live in it to avoid CGT, or is this a no-no regardless?...

CGT can be complicated, but basically...


1) Work out home many months you will have owned it.

2) Add up all the time it was your primary residence in months. Add on 18 months.


then, work out the %age of liability you have for the time when it wasn't your primary residence. So if you've owned it 15 years (180 months) and it was you primary residence for 10.5 years (126 months, plus 18, so 144 months). So your CGT liability is (180-144)/180, so 20% of the gain.


Then, work your capital gain (i.e. sell price - buy price). Lets say that is ?400k. Your CGT liability is 20% of that, so 80K. That is your taxable gain - you will pay tax on that at a rate depending on your income.


But, there is also some sort of rental relief you can claim as well. You'd really should talk to a tax expert before you sell. Again, Coman & Co were really helpful.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...