Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yesterday was Voting Registration Day - a good day to receive from Southwark notification that one elector in my household had had her postal vote removed (not at her request) and had been set back to 'Polling Station' - since she will not be in London on the day of the General Election (or for weeks around that - hence the need for a postal vote) that means that her vote has actually been taken away from her, on Voting Registration Day. Of course, I cannot get this corrected - she only can do this ('Data Protection') - apparently pointing out that there is an error (and a simple check of the paper trail showing no request to change voting method status isn't sufficient) - and not being about in London this will prove complex and difficult, although it may be possible (not confirmed) that it can be done by e-mail (oh yes, the system, and I use that word advisedly, to allow changes on the internet doesn't allow for that change to be made).


So, another victory for the apparatchiks over the concept of democracy. You now have to go to extra lengths to get corrected a mistake made by them which will effectively disenfranchise you. Oh, and the final absurdity - she had just completed and sent in a form to record her signature so that her postal vote could be validated! You couldn't make it up!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/54165-voting-irony/
Share on other sites

It's a pain, and they screwed up my postal vote but wrote to me shortly afterwards stating there had been a mistake (this was late last year).


I'd suggest you get all forms sent to the registered address, then scoot them off to her wherever she is, and get her to return to you. Then post back normally. It's a pain, but it's do-able. Had to do this several times with legal docs, and it's often the only way to get all signatures on one piece of paper.


But yes, don't get me started on the palava involved in getting registered!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/54165-voting-irony/#findComment-820917
Share on other sites

I'd suggest you get all forms sent to the registered address


That was precisely my thought, but when I asked I was refused - because I was not the person in question on whose behalf the error had been made - it is she and she alone who can request the form, which I was told (initially) she must do by phoning in working hours and then (if my experience is anything to go by) hanging on for 15 minutes listening to anodyne Southwark Council recorded messages before speaking to a live person. In the end I had to talk to 3 separate executives (in the laughingly entitled customer service department) before one admitted that she might be able to e-mail them to ask for the papers to be sent to the registered address, but that only she could do this. Of course the 'data protection' shield is complete cr*p - since all I was asking for was the forms for her to fill in - but that's what the apparat gets up to when they can. Voter Registration Day? Voter Horsesh*t more like.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/54165-voting-irony/#findComment-820925
Share on other sites

It's so frickin archane. Why can't we have a secure login / online voting system? The idea of going to a polling station and then making a cross on a bit of paper with a pencil just seems so in efficient. Manning all those polling stations, gathering the bits of paper - counting them etc. etc. Surely in this day and age there are better ways to do this. It's no wonder so many young people don't bother. Never mind the politicians themselves, just the process seems out of touch with modern life.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/54165-voting-irony/#findComment-820939
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://www.facebook.com/labourparty/posts/when-your-family-and-friends-ask-you-what-labour-has-achieved-so-far-send-them-t/1090481149116565/    Do you mean going from rhyming with Message to rhyming with Massage?  Or was it really a hard g to start with, rhyming, say,  with Farague/Faraig or Fararg?
    • Why on earth is there so much interest, and negativity, after a 100 days of a Labour government when we had 1000s of days of dreadful government before this with hardly a chat on this Website?  What is it that is suddenly so much greater interest? Here's part of a list of what they have done in a 100 days - it's from a Labour MP so obviously there is some bias, and mainly new Bills so yet to deliver/put into law.  This reminds me of the US election where the popular view was that Biden had achieved nothing, rather than leading the recovery after Covid, a fairer tax system, housing, supporting workers, dealing with community unrest following high profile racist incidents,  So if we think Starmer is ineffective and Labour incompetent then we are all going to believe it? I do feel sick after seeing Clarkson on Newsnight, playing to the gallery.  Surely Trump must have a high profile role for him on the environment and climate change  
    • Hi looking for a shed for my allotment. Can pick up
    • But do you not understand how tough farming is, especially post-Brexit when some of the subsidies were lost and costs have increased massively yet the prices farmers can charge has not? On the BBC News tonight they said pig farming costs had gone up 54% since 2019, cow farming costs up 44% and cereal costs up 43%. The NFU said that the margins are on average 0.5% return on capital. Land and buildings are assets that don't make money until you sell them...it's what you do with them that makes money and farms are struggling to make money and so many farms are generational family businesses so never realise the assets (one farmers on the news said his farm had been in the family since 1822) but will have to to pay tax for continuing the family business. On another news item tonight there was a short piece saying the government has said that 50,000 more pensioners will be forced into relative poverty (60% of the average income) due to the Winter Fuel Allowance removal which will rise to 100,000 more by 2027. James Murray from the Treasury was rolled out on Newsnight to try and defend that and couldn't. You can't give doctors 20%+ and push more pensioners into poverty as a result.  The problem for Labour is the court of public opinion will judge them and right now the jury is out after a series of own-goals, really poor communication and ill-thought-out idealogical policies. And don't ever annoy the farmers.....;-)  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...