Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yesterday was Voting Registration Day - a good day to receive from Southwark notification that one elector in my household had had her postal vote removed (not at her request) and had been set back to 'Polling Station' - since she will not be in London on the day of the General Election (or for weeks around that - hence the need for a postal vote) that means that her vote has actually been taken away from her, on Voting Registration Day. Of course, I cannot get this corrected - she only can do this ('Data Protection') - apparently pointing out that there is an error (and a simple check of the paper trail showing no request to change voting method status isn't sufficient) - and not being about in London this will prove complex and difficult, although it may be possible (not confirmed) that it can be done by e-mail (oh yes, the system, and I use that word advisedly, to allow changes on the internet doesn't allow for that change to be made).


So, another victory for the apparatchiks over the concept of democracy. You now have to go to extra lengths to get corrected a mistake made by them which will effectively disenfranchise you. Oh, and the final absurdity - she had just completed and sent in a form to record her signature so that her postal vote could be validated! You couldn't make it up!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/54165-voting-irony/
Share on other sites

It's a pain, and they screwed up my postal vote but wrote to me shortly afterwards stating there had been a mistake (this was late last year).


I'd suggest you get all forms sent to the registered address, then scoot them off to her wherever she is, and get her to return to you. Then post back normally. It's a pain, but it's do-able. Had to do this several times with legal docs, and it's often the only way to get all signatures on one piece of paper.


But yes, don't get me started on the palava involved in getting registered!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/54165-voting-irony/#findComment-820917
Share on other sites

I'd suggest you get all forms sent to the registered address


That was precisely my thought, but when I asked I was refused - because I was not the person in question on whose behalf the error had been made - it is she and she alone who can request the form, which I was told (initially) she must do by phoning in working hours and then (if my experience is anything to go by) hanging on for 15 minutes listening to anodyne Southwark Council recorded messages before speaking to a live person. In the end I had to talk to 3 separate executives (in the laughingly entitled customer service department) before one admitted that she might be able to e-mail them to ask for the papers to be sent to the registered address, but that only she could do this. Of course the 'data protection' shield is complete cr*p - since all I was asking for was the forms for her to fill in - but that's what the apparat gets up to when they can. Voter Registration Day? Voter Horsesh*t more like.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/54165-voting-irony/#findComment-820925
Share on other sites

It's so frickin archane. Why can't we have a secure login / online voting system? The idea of going to a polling station and then making a cross on a bit of paper with a pencil just seems so in efficient. Manning all those polling stations, gathering the bits of paper - counting them etc. etc. Surely in this day and age there are better ways to do this. It's no wonder so many young people don't bother. Never mind the politicians themselves, just the process seems out of touch with modern life.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/54165-voting-irony/#findComment-820939
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • As I had a moan on here about the truly abysmal Christmas meal we had at The Cherry Tree last year, I am redressing the balance by saying we had a really excellent Christmas meal at Franklins last night. Every course was absolutely delicious and  really well cooked. The staff were lovely despite being exhausted and run off their feet. In particular, my sea bass was a large portion and cooked to perfection, in stark contrast to the small dried up portion The Cherry Tree provided, from which I was barely able to scrape a teaspoonful of flesh (that is not an exaggeration). And our Franklins meal cost less than half what we paid at The Cherry Tree (to be fair, that was on Christmas Day so the Cherry Tree costs would have been higher, but that doesn't excuse the appalling quality meal). Thank you again to Franklins for restoring our faith in eating out at Christmas! 
    • That is almost too ridiculous to answer but I'll take the bait. You are comparing a national charity with one branch of a small charity. Cats Protection has around 34 dedicated rehoming centres. CHAT has two, Lewisham & Canning Town and a sanctuary in Sussex. So if Cats Protection have homed 34,000 cats, thats an average of 1000 per branch. From memory this years total so far for Lewisham CHAT was over 980. I saw a few homed this weekend so we may well reach 1000 for this year. The same as Cats Protection. No need for head scratching.    
    • Actually, if it was factory fitted then it's location would be documented. It's the fact that it can be fitted in different places which means that it's difficult for thieves to locate. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...