Jump to content

Recommended Posts

They have started demolition on the old Bredinghurst school site.

The deadline we had as locals to oppose plans ended on the 31st Jan

On the 26th of Jan the demolition team moved in punched hole through Inverton road side Wall

Surely if the deadline was the 31st, they should have at least made it look as though they were taking

local views into consideration. We all know it was a foregone conclusion and the council were not interested in anyones views.

They started demolishing the semi detached buildings to the rear on Monday 2nd Feb

Why did they waste money on stamps sending us letters asking our opinions, when deadline was

Saturday, the council doesnt work Saturday or Sunday,

But they started demolition on the following Monday

dont a panel have sit and look at all the responses.

My self I am happy about Ivydale having the site

What Upsets me is they have not incorporated any of these fine buildings

especially Newlands house [ which was its original name ] into any of the plans

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/54163-waste-of/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I can't believe this. I noticed properly this week, never received any notification from council and this is happening at the end of my road. Last thing I saw last year was a book (Labour)stating that they were keeping the current buildings. Disgraceful, seeing as this will impact on residents and none of us told. I'm not actually sure that any school should expand to four form entry. Would have been nice for them to open a new school (not Harris!)
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/54163-waste-of/#findComment-823428
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://www.facebook.com/labourparty/posts/when-your-family-and-friends-ask-you-what-labour-has-achieved-so-far-send-them-t/1090481149116565/    Do you mean going from rhyming with Message to rhyming with Massage?  Or was it really a hard g to start with, rhyming, say,  with Farague/Faraig or Fararg?
    • Why on earth is there so much interest, and negativity, after a 100 days of a Labour government when we had 1000s of days of dreadful government before this with hardly a chat on this Website?  What is it that is suddenly so much greater interest? Here's part of a list of what they have done in a 100 days - it's from a Labour MP so obviously there is some bias, and mainly new Bills so yet to deliver/put into law.  This reminds me of the US election where the popular view was that Biden had achieved nothing, rather than leading the recovery after Covid, a fairer tax system, housing, supporting workers, dealing with community unrest following high profile racist incidents,  So if we think Starmer is ineffective and Labour incompetent then we are all going to believe it? I do feel sick after seeing Clarkson on Newsnight, playing to the gallery.  Surely Trump must have a high profile role for him on the environment and climate change  
    • Hi looking for a shed for my allotment. Can pick up
    • But do you not understand how tough farming is, especially post-Brexit when some of the subsidies were lost and costs have increased massively yet the prices farmers can charge has not? On the BBC News tonight they said pig farming costs had gone up 54% since 2019, cow farming costs up 44% and cereal costs up 43%. The NFU said that the margins are on average 0.5% return on capital. Land and buildings are assets that don't make money until you sell them...it's what you do with them that makes money and farms are struggling to make money and so many farms are generational family businesses so never realise the assets (one farmers on the news said his farm had been in the family since 1822) but will have to to pay tax for continuing the family business. On another news item tonight there was a short piece saying the government has said that 50,000 more pensioners will be forced into relative poverty (60% of the average income) due to the Winter Fuel Allowance removal which will rise to 100,000 more by 2027. James Murray from the Treasury was rolled out on Newsnight to try and defend that and couldn't. You can't give doctors 20%+ and push more pensioners into poverty as a result.  The problem for Labour is the court of public opinion will judge them and right now the jury is out after a series of own-goals, really poor communication and ill-thought-out idealogical policies. And don't ever annoy the farmers.....;-)  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...