Jump to content

PROTECTING PECKHAM?S ROOFTOP VIEW: Presenting the petition Sat 7 Feb 3pm


Recommended Posts

Presenting the petition is the next stage in the campaign to protect Peckham's view from the rooftops on the Bussey building and the cinema/multi-storey car park building, while the future uses of the car park building are being examined.


Can you spare an hour on Saturday afternoon to support the deputation? We need as many supporters as possible to help ward councillors see the significance of this issue. This is about the need to have an integrated view to planning key aspects of the town centre. They do sometimes listen if they know enough local people are seriously taking a watchful interest.


Please come to support the petition presentation at the

Peckham & Nunhead Community Council on

SATURDAY 7th February at 3.00pm, in the Damilola Taylor Centre,

1 East Surrey Grove, off Commercial Way, near Southampton Way.


Please sign & share the link to the petition: https://www.change.org/p/protect-peckham-s-rooftop-view


SOME BACKGROUND


* Rooftops view campaign: http://www.peckhamvision.org/wiki/Multi-Storey_Car_Park#August_2014_Campaign_to_protect_Peckham.27s_rooftop_views

* Why it is not a NO campaign: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,1391612,1404563#msg-1404563

* Cinema / multi storey car park future: http://www.peckhamvision.org/wiki/Multi-Storey_Car_Park#Planning_status_of_the_cinema.2Fmulti-storey_car_park

The petition to protect Peckham?s Rooftop View will be presented by the deputation tomorrow SATURDAY 7th February 3pm. Please come to support. It is really important to show the Council the extent of local concern. The Peckham & Nunhead Community Council is meeting in the Damilola Taylor Centre, 1 East Surrey Grove, off Commercial Way, near the junction with Southampton Way.


There will also be another important item now on the agenda ? they will be announcing the architects appointed for the next stage of the Peckham Rye Station CoDesign developments. This is a good opportunity to ask questions or make comments if you have any about the CoDesign process and what is going to be happening next.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am sorry to  continue this, but I found your previous  comment about me very personal,  disturbing and upsetting, which was why I responded at length. I'm sorry it bored you. I try to stick to facts. I have investigated. You (and anyone else) can go into the "search" settings on here and  do a search on an author's name. So you can (I presume) find all my posts, including any which were  replying  to you. I can't imagine that they are in greater numbers than my replies to anyone else, but you can see for yourself. I guess you can probably also find examples of what you call my "usual sarcasm". I wasn't aware that l had a tendency to sarcasm, though I do find a lot of things funny.  There is no need to reply to this unless you actually find evidence in support of what you said. Sorry everybody else. I had to get it off my chest as I was lying awake last night worrying about it 😭
    • Roy Ayers RIP   https://www.theguardian.com/music/2025/mar/06/roy-ayers-jazz-funk-pioneer-everybody-loves-the-sunshine-dies
    • The Section 20 is just notification of intention to carry out works.  You have the right to object, propose an alternative or find different contractors. If you are joint freeholders why is your co freeholder acting unilaterally?  What is your usual mechanism for making decisions?
    • Hello, Does anyone have any other recommendations? Thank you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...