Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Blackcurrant Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Another giant box to match the one over the

> station.



I heard the "box over the station" had stalled due to disagreements over the old station building. Clearly this proposal was going to use that development as context, but perhaps that's not so easy now. The planning policy for the rise will need to be clarified. In my opinion the railway cottages should be conserved and the opposite side of the rise limited to two-storey development.

... which will help give the Council the excuse to shut Grove Vale Library and not open a new one on the old garden centre site as planned because the development has stalled. As I mentioned to Cllr Barber a while ago, the new library is by no means a done deal.

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ... which will help give the Council the excuse to

> shut Grove Vale Library and not open a new one on

> the old garden centre site as planned because the

> development has stalled. As I mentioned to Cllr

> Barber a while ago, the new library is by no means

> a done deal.


The library should be separate issue.

These proposals are - in my view - highly destructive.


Is there anyone here who has experience of campaigning in this kind of context who would like to take the lead on this? If so I feel sure there would be people here - myself included - who would be very happy to work on it with them.


The suggestion of working via English Heritage (as made earlier on this thread) is a good one. I imagine the Victorian Society might also be helpful.


Others may be more aware than myself of the appropriate timetable for action in relation to the latest planning application.

rahrahrah - I assume your question about pricing for 'an average salary' is rhetorical! The 'garden centre' plans dodged the social housing requirement by including the library.


steveo - Yes, I'm not sure where all those jolly people are boulevarding to and from. And is that a bus that's taken a wrong turn?


abeattie - I guess we'll know about the consultation period once the official letters have been sent out. I'll post something on here as soon as we know.

Consultation period ends 28 Feb according to this http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk:8190/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=dates&keyVal=_STHWR_DCAPR_9558549


The on line comments form indicates that there is an attempt to restrict comments to 1000 characters .


I think there may be more interest from posters if the thread title were changed to indicate that the subject was concern over a recent planning application to develop Railway Rise .

The simplest way to block demolition would be to fill out the English Heritage form EDHistory posted a link to. Surely doing that will force Southwark to put things on hold.


The drawing is monstrous but presumably just the start of a negotiation process in which the developer hopes to get planning for maximum number of units - I doubt they expect to get approval for the first round. But who knows what random decision Southwark might come to - they believe there's a housing shortage rather than a house price bubble and are rubber stamping developments everywhere in the borough.

Also, didn't another poster say they contacted English Heritage and they said it didn't merit protection? While these are unique to Dulwich, they aren't unique in London and don't have any specific merit when compared to the numerous railway cottages that exist from what I understand.



You are probably better off objecting specifically to what you dislike and using planning criteria for objections. I imagine the owner of the remaining cottage can object potentially to loss of amenity.

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> While these are unique to Dulwich,

> they aren't unique in London and don't have any

> specific merit when compared to the numerous

> railway cottages that exist from what I

> understand.


I've not been able to locate any other London examples.


Can you help?


John K

The suggestion in the developer's covering letter that this and the development on the station side of Railway Rise will somehow "enhance" this area of East Dulwich are somewhat lost on me, frankly! And blimey, looking through the design and access statement for this proposed development has really hammered home just how massive the development on the station side is going to be.


It's all terribly sad given how in the past when one has emerged from the station, it feels far less urban than other areas of the city. If they proceed, these two developments will certainly begin to put paid to that feeling.

Ednewmy, which is exactly what certain powers want, because that urban look can be used to justify further urbanisation. This is a link to a great article explaining precisely how London is being sold up to developers and to what extent councils and politicians are in the pocket of developers, who hold the whip hand in the planning game. Note the bits about Peter John our own Labour Council leader, and the ongoing Heygate scandal. Read and weep.


Remember that the likes of the Harris Federation, who are accruing schools and land faster than you can say primary, are arguably just another developer.


http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2014/sep/17/truth-property-developers-builders-exploit-planning-cities

Jennys Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Google "railway cottage London" and you will find

> quite a few examples of Victorian railway workers'

> cottages although I didn't see any exactly like

> the East Dulwich ones.


I can't see anything similar.


I think the building is a bit of a gem, though it's a shame the tyre shop currently hides it from view unless you walk up Railway Rise. Also a shame the old cobbles have been tarmaced over.


http://i59.tinypic.com/35ibo9l.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Walking last Friday early evening anywhere near where the bottom end of Lordship Lane meets the Goose Green roundabout, one would have been directly confronted - as I was - with this scene: Outside the East Dulwich Tavern an impenetrable phalanx of pushing yobs, shouty louts and selfish yahoos pressed outward from the open doors of this establishment, past the curtilage (the land in front of and owned by the business), all across the public right of way, to the kerbside. This was the situation all the way along, end to end. I watched as passersby, old people, children, parents with buggies, people just going about their business, were forced by these booze-sucking bellowing scumbags onto the road - where, at that hour, traffic rushed endlessly off the roundabout. We have, I realised, somehow become so used to this revolting spectacles as to believe it to be inevitable. It is not. This is why I'm dropping this post. Enough really is enough. This roiling boozy blockade represents a total failure by all the responsible authorities - the licencing authority, for example - but most of all (yet once more, again, as ever), by Southwark Council. Two very different comparisons to give you some perspective: 1. The Kings Head pub on the corner of Albermarle and Stafford Streets, London SW1. Here too, patrons like to drink and chat outside on a warm evening - why should they not. But here, on the latter side a line marks the curtilage on the pavement. Drinkers remain, respectfully, in good order, within the line, watched, quietly and carefully, by a security guard. I wager good money this arrangement is a condition of this pub's licence. 2. The Blue Brick is a cafe in the quiet backstreets of East Dulwich, on the corners of Fellbrigg and Shawbury Roads. Until a few months ago, about half its covers were tables out on the pavement. They bothered nobody. Oh! But they extended all of several centimetres too far into the footpath, so into fearless action swang Southwark Council officers - and now these tables are gone. Result, eh? "Well you see," some wiseacre said to me, "There needs to be a complaint." Not actually true, but for sure this is all too often how local authorities get pushed to do what they should be doing. Hard to think why a complaint trumps, say (and god forbid!) a child being injured on the road. In which circumstance, of course!, Southwark would swing into noisy, virtue-signalling, belated action. But in any case let this post be considered a big, very definite COMPLAINT about this prolonged abuse of our public right of way. I invite readers who agree with me to add their voices. Oh, and all those wee local ward councillors might get off their chufties, defy their party managers, and actually help sort this scandal out. Thanks for reading, Lee Scoresby
    • Hi there, I saw that Google lists the park opening time as 7:30am, but I was wondering if it might actually open earlier than that - maybe anyone who’s out running early or passing by has noticed?  
    • We are thrilled to announce that Little Stars Creche in Dulwich will be opening its doors on 28th April and we would love to invite you and your little ones to an open day where you can meet our team and visit our wonderful setting.  Little Stars is a fun creative space for children aged 2 to 4 years to enjoy whilst parents and carers get some well needed time to catch up on life! We are so excited to bring this much-needed service to the community, and we want to thank all the wonderful parents and carers for participating in our recent survey. Your feedback was invaluable in shaping Little Stars and ensuring it meets the needs of local families. For full information about Little Stars and a detailed schedule please visit our webpage here: Little Stars Crèche We can’t wait to meet you and your little stars soon!
    • Avoid any 2nd hand vehicle with the Ford petrol 1.0 Ecoboost engine and the Petrol 1.2 PureTech engine that can be found in Peugeot, Citroen, Vauxhall.... (you need to mention price for advice)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...