Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi


My other half has been in desperate need for some new cufflinks and every birthday, anniversary etx he's been asking for them but I've never been able to find any decent ones. Can anyone recommend where to buy decent cufflinks up to ?80-100?


I think I've always avoided buying them because I have no idea on what constitutes as 'nice' cufflinks (im the same with ties!). He works with lots of clients and consults a lot - would something like plane or car shaped cufflinks be too novelty / tacky looking? Been looking at Paul Smith - are these OTT?

I understand it's personal preference but any constructive advice would be appreciated. Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/53884-advice-on-mens-cufflinks/
Share on other sites

Agent Sunlover,


Paul Smith or Ted Baker are fine for that price range.


Plain and or Silver are safe as Stevo mentioned, but you can venture away from this as long as the branding is absent or very subtle i.e. avoid a Moschino look.


Your instincts on vehicle shaped are on point.

Am I the only one who loves this Henry guy?


All above is great advice...Avoid novelty...blingy....and branded unless really subtle also good advice. Also avoid too large/chunky and ones with a chain connector which are too fiddley for every day use.


Plain silver is good as it's classic...I also have some great silver squares with a simple amber stone from Portobello market which are great and were approx 40 quid.

Planes/cars can be nice but rare and I wouldn't advise you buy for someone.


Go for something plain, preferably silver and rectangular - there's a shop on Northcross Road - Rigby Mac? - that sells some nice plain ones.


Lastly you shouldn't have to pay more than ?50 unless you're buying gold

Had to be careful how you displayed the Pepe Jeans key ring as well...



MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rings and earrings...are a total no no for me

> given my facial disposition.

>

> Where I grew up (1986 or so) a man wearing an

> earring on his right ear was a homosexual but left

> hand side was straight. That was small town

> Scotland with eighties styling for you.

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rings and earrings...are a total no no for me

> given my facial disposition.

>

> Where I grew up (1986 or so) a man wearing an

> earring on his right ear was a homosexual but left

> hand side was straight. That was small town

> Scotland with eighties styling for you.


Standard 70s/80s although in the 70s you got called a 'poof' fairly widely if you had an earinng full stop. Hardly any blokes had both pierced, except trannies (am I allowed that word? I don't fookin know). Silver or gold Hoop/Hoop & cross or stud were the choices.


At 30ish mine went. Unless you're Kieth Richard, it's a bit sad beyond 30 :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am sorry to  continue this, but I found your previous  comment about me very personal,  disturbing and upsetting, which was why I responded at length. I'm sorry it bored you. I try to stick to facts. I have investigated. You (and anyone else) can go into the "search" settings on here and  do a search on an author's name. So you can (I presume) find all my posts, including any which were  replying  to you. I can't imagine that they are in greater numbers than my replies to anyone else, but you can see for yourself. I guess you can probably also find examples of what you call my "usual sarcasm". I wasn't aware that l had a tendency to sarcasm, though I do find a lot of things funny.  There is no need to reply to this unless you actually find evidence in support of what you said. Sorry everybody else. I had to get it off my chest as I was lying awake last night worrying about it 😭
    • Roy Ayers RIP   https://www.theguardian.com/music/2025/mar/06/roy-ayers-jazz-funk-pioneer-everybody-loves-the-sunshine-dies
    • The Section 20 is just notification of intention to carry out works.  You have the right to object, propose an alternative or find different contractors. If you are joint freeholders why is your co freeholder acting unilaterally?  What is your usual mechanism for making decisions?
    • Hello, Does anyone have any other recommendations? Thank you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...