Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Really, they new 'improved' look of the Guardian website is terrible. Huge text, strange pointless links, and loads of wasted space. Less info per page. Big sodding useless pictures. All the news seems to be hidden. I can't find a bloody thing. Has no one learnt anything from the Windows 8 debacle?


Anyone read The Indy website? Is that any better?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/53861-so-farewell-then-gruiniad/
Share on other sites

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> tho he's miss-spelt the miss-spell :)



And you have misspelled the misspell. How embarrassing.


http://grammar.yourdictionary.com/spelling-and-word-lists/misspelled.html


?misspell - What is more embarrassing than to misspell the name of the problem? Just remember that it is mis + spell and that will spell you the worry about spelling "misspell."

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And yeah, I hate the re-design. But I hate the Indy website too - those f*king adverts chasing

> you all over the screen make me want to vote Tory and get the left-wing banned.


I use Firefox and AdBlockPlus. I turned it off one day and was shocked at the big ad at the top of the Guardian website. I'd never seen it before.


I don't have a style issue with the Guardian redesign (though it is ugly), more that there is not enough info per page - the front page of the site being a case in question. Cricinfo is going the same way, though not quite as bad.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I don't have a style issue with the Guardian

> redesign (though it is ugly), more that there is

> not enough info per page - the front page of the

> site being a case in question. Cricinfo is going

> the same way, though not quite as bad.


Yeah, the reason I hate the re-design is you don't get the news. You get three items of news, and then Maureen f***king Lipman saying she's going to leave the country.


Also, I'm quite judgemental. I like to judge the editors each day by the order they've run the stories (fracking v. Boko Haram; Benedict Cumberbatch a racist v. Church of Scientology - which is more worthy of our time and consideration). They've ruined everything.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am sorry to  continue this, but I found your previous  comment about me very personal,  disturbing and upsetting, which was why I responded at length. I'm sorry it bored you. I try to stick to facts. I have investigated. You (and anyone else) can go into the "search" settings on here and  do a search on an author's name. So you can (I presume) find all my posts, including any which were  replying  to you. I can't imagine that they are in greater numbers than my replies to anyone else, but you can see for yourself. I guess you can probably also find examples of what you call my "usual sarcasm". I wasn't aware that l had a tendency to sarcasm, though I do find a lot of things funny.  There is no need to reply to this unless you actually find evidence in support of what you said. Sorry everybody else. I had to get it off my chest as I was lying awake last night worrying about it 😭
    • Roy Ayers RIP   https://www.theguardian.com/music/2025/mar/06/roy-ayers-jazz-funk-pioneer-everybody-loves-the-sunshine-dies
    • The Section 20 is just notification of intention to carry out works.  You have the right to object, propose an alternative or find different contractors. If you are joint freeholders why is your co freeholder acting unilaterally?  What is your usual mechanism for making decisions?
    • Hello, Does anyone have any other recommendations? Thank you
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...