Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There is a petition now online to save the woodland from planned developments in the Camberwell Old and New Cemeteries. Please sign it here if you are concerned by the plans: https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/save-southwark-woods/


The text of the petition is below:


Save the beautiful wild woods of Camberwell Old and New Cemeteries for people, for nature and for the future!


Why is this important?


Southwark Council is planning to destroy the woods of Camberwell Old and New Cemeteries, including felling over 30 mature trees, to make way for more than 2,000 new burial plots. Woodlands are the lungs of London. We want the cemeteries turned into local Nature Reserves, as with Nunhead Cemetery. Both cemeteries are part of the London Green Chain Walk and Camberwell Old Cemetery is a Grade 1 Site of Borough Importance for Nature Conservation. These wonderful woodlands are home to protected species, a wild tangle of trees and undergrowth, a haven of habitats and they are valuable to nature, to people and to the future.


These woodlands provide many valuable benefits locally, cleaning the air, absorbing and filtering storm water, keeping the neighbourhood cool in summer, and providing beautiful, natural places for our mental and physical well-being.


Sign the petition and help Save Southwark Woods!


Want to do more?

Join the Facebook Page and tell your friends ? Save Southwark Woods!

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Save-Southwark-Woods/700671496717263


Follow the campaign on twitter @SouthwarkWoods

http://www.savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk



Come and protest these proposals at the public meeting with Southwark Council: 7.00pm - 8.30pm Wednesday 11th February 2015, at Honor Oak Baptist Church, 108 Forest Hill Road SE22 0SG, with an exhibition of the council?s plans and opportunity to comment from 2.00pm.

https://www.facebook.com/events/1536699583280095/



Email the London Borough of Southwark to protest the potential loss of this woodland which is a Grade 1 Site of Borough Importance:

environment@southwark.gov.uk

planning@southwark.gov.uk


Download Southwark?s own reports and surveys about their plans for the cemeteries:


http://www.southwark.gov.uk/downloads/download/4010/cemeteries_plans

How it will be delivered


We will be delivering the petition at the Public Meeting with the Council on 11th February

I didn't draft the petition but am helping to circulate it. My understanding is that while the petition focuses on the immediate threat to the woods in the cemeteries, there is broader concern over the priority given to trees and green space in the borough by southwark council. I will post your question on the save southwark woods Facebook page for more information, to reach the organisers directly.


Marie-Annick

Not wishing to sound insensitive but I do not think there is room for burials in this crowded area, housing, jobs space and green space need to be the priority, I believe when the big cemetries in Nunhead and Highgate were opened they were in relative edge of urban area?

Councillor Darren Merrill who is the Cabinet Member for Environment and Recyling and a Labour councillor has offered to meet with us at 10.30 this coming Sunday 8th February to discuss the planned developments in the Camberwell Old Cemetery.

He will meet us at the main gate to the cemetery, the one in Forest Hill Road, London SE22

We are hoping that we will be able to go into Area Z which is the fenced off area next to Underhill Road and Rye Dale so that we can be shown exactly what the Council plan to do in there and which trees they want to remove.

Therefore I suggest you wear stout footwear.

This meeting is open to anyone who wants to find out more about what is going on regarding this cemetery and its woodlands.

  • 2 weeks later...

Update from Save Southwark Woods for those not following on Facebook/Twitter.


At the Public Meeting, the council gave residents until Friday 20th February, a typically short period to make comments on their brutal, destructive and short-term proposals. Here are the people to write to, it can be in one email/letter and you can be as specific or as general as you wish, but has to be with them by Friday 20th.


The people to write to are:


Officers:

simon.bevan@southwark.gov.uk Simon Bevan, Head of Planning

Rebecca.towers@southwark.gov.uk Rebecca Towers, Parks & Open Spaces Manager

Des.Waters@southwark.gov.uk Des Waters, Head of Public Realm


Copy in Councillors:

Darren.merrill@southwark.gov.uk Cllr Darren Merrill

Victoria.Mills@southwark.gov.uk Clly Victoria Mills

Renata.Hamvas@southwark.gov.uk Cllr Renata Hamvas


And please copy us in too!

southwarkwoods@gmail.com


The main points Save Southwark Woods is calling for are:

? For these woodlands, wooded areas and greenspaces to be protected and managed for nature and people - no new burials

? For both cemeteries to be declared the Local Nature Reserves they really are, and managed as Nunhead Cemetery is

? That years of illegal fly tipping under the council?s watch should not be the excuse used for a massive redevelopment not just of Area Z but across the whole of these magical woods, with sanitised landscaping and THOUSANDS of burial plots instead of woodland at the end of it

? A full Public Consultation 2015/2016 on these brutal and destructive proposals, denied to the public with a toothless public information exercise instead

If you wish to express support for the SSW campaign too, that would be great but the main thing is to make your comments known. The council has tried to get this through without anyone realising what was happening. Tell them they can't pull the wool over residents' eyes like this.

I have recently been walking around Camberwell Old Cemetery, and have noticed considerable water-logging of graves - and that at the top of the hill. I suspect that the recent tarmacing of the pathways will have exacerbated the problems of water run-off - many of the graves (including depressions of burials now unmarked) were ponds.


The problem of water-logging will be exacerbated down the hill particularly where trees (which are fine sinks for water) are removed - thus making the proposed new (or revived) areas for burial even more prone to flooding and water-logging, as I would imagine there will be a lot more tarmac put down for pathways to support vehicles (hearses etc.) in the new burials.


Do you know whether there have been proper hydrological surveys done of the site, and forecasts of impact once the existing scrub woodland is removed? I suspect this could be an additional argument that those wishing to preserve the woods may wish to put forward.

What about elderly local people who want their relative to be buried in a place accessible to them to visit? Or families who want a spouse/sibling/child buried with other family members? These are choices that should be open to people and it is not the Council's job to tell people how to treat the remains of family members. I am not sure what the alternative is. That is not to say that a cemetery should be a place of sterile landscaping. I would have thought that there was scope for compromise with many more burial plots (for which there is clearly a demand) but accompanied by sensitive and naturalistic (with native plants) landscaping. Lots of churchyards are beautiful places.

I don't think anyone is saying people don?t have the right to be buried or buried with their loved ones. The question is whether the council should guarantee that they can provide this service indefinitely inside an urban borough and whether it should be at the cost of valuable woodland green spaces and wildlife reserves.


Many other boroughs in London do not provide this service and there is no major public outcry about it. I don?t think it is unreasonable to expect people who live in over crowded cities to not be able to bury their dead near by, inside the city. Indeed when the cemeteries themselves were set up they where right on the edge of the city and that was a time when 100% of people had burials. That is no longer the case now and roughly only 25% want burials and these area are inside a polluted city. The importance of utility for other reasons has changed a great deal. There is a very strong case for re-evaluating how these important green spaces are used.


It seems to me very unfair that only the needs of 25% population are taken into consideration when planning what to do with these areas.


As it stands there is some scope for increased burials in both cemeteries with both new areas and reuse of old plots without destroying the woodlands in areas D1 and Z. I would like to the council to put the plans for those areas in particular on hold until there is a full public consultation on the matter. At the very least consider them for alternatives to the very destructive high concentration full grave stone burials plots proposed, for more environmentally friendly options such woodland burials or small memorial plaques or ash scattering areas. D1 especially is to me an area of outstanding natural beauty and part of the woodland on One Tree Hill. Surely an alternative to destroying it would be preferable.


Ultimately these are public places, it should be up to the public to decide how they are used.

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have recently been walking around Camberwell Old

> Cemetery, and have noticed considerable

> water-logging of graves - and that at the top of

> the hill.


I posted about this a while back and have reported on a number of occasions to Southwark Council. The only response I've ever received (a telephone call) suggested this was "expected" and would settle once the graves on the raised part were filled so that the earth wasn't being disturbed so regularly. Sounded like a weak explanation to me. I've also raised this in connection with the consultation on the new works - have they learned the lessons from the first phase? Again, no response.

I agree HenryB. In Switzerland, plots are 'rented' for 25 years and then reused. It may sound harsh but space is at a premium and it is done out of necessity. I know that the death of a loved one is a painful experience and that it can bring comfort to relatives/friends to be able to visit a grave but in a city the size and density of London this can't be something that can be seen as a local 'right'. Every piece of woodland that is chopped down destroys habitat for wildlife and a place that future generations can visit and enjoy. I hope the petition can make a difference.
I actually agree with much of what you say henryb. The Southwark proposals for regimented ranks of gravestones and wide tarmac paths are ugly, 'municipal' and anachronistic and will not be ameliorated by planting the odd native shrub. They show a woeful lack of imagination as well as a crass insensitivity to landscape. But equally, I do not agree at all with the no change/no new burials argument. I like the idea of opening up a wider area for quiet walks, through re-attaching zone Z to the cemetery and creating a wider network of paths. I think there is plenty of room for increasing the number of burial plots across a wider area and thinking more creatively about how they are arranged and what they might look like. I think that a half-decent landscape designer, working with expert advice re habitat/ecology/biodiversity could come up with something really quite beautiful and imaginative that increases public amenity, meets some of the demand for burials, and preserves (or even enhances biodiversity and a sense of a green oasis in the city. I think we should be lobbying Southwark massively to raise their game, not just resisting change.

Walk to Save Southwark Woods - 8th March


The 100 Acre Wood Walk

A Teddy Bears? Moveable Feast


Sunday 8th March

11AM - 1PM

Meet 10.30AM

Camberwell Old Cemetery Gates

Forest Hill Road SE22 0SQ


Walk to Save Southwark Woods!

The council want to put 6,000 burial plots in our magical Southwark Woods at Camberwell Old and New Cemeteries.

Residents have a better idea - a100 Acre Wood for the well-being of the local community and South London.

Bring balloons, cake, banners, flags, instruments, dogs on leashes, wellies...

and your teddy bears!


Route

Through Camberwell Old Cemetery woods

Up and over One Tree Hill

Through Camberwell New Cemetery

Over to Nunhead Cemetery

Finish at the Ivy House for 1PM


Walk to save the magical nature of our 100 Acre Wood!


http://www.savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk/walk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...