Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I always thought she was from Wandsworth? For the very same reasons Katie Hopkins (also in the house) dislikes her, I find her equally annoying. She has been supporting a fellow housemate called Perez Hilton (some sort of US columnist/blogger) who's been deeply disingenuous and annoying. Nadia dislikes Katie so much, and yet rarely confronts her to her face. But more than happy to have a rant behind her back. Really gets my back up.


Louisa.

Just remembered I met Nadia Sawalha at a book launch years ago and she seemed very nice and down to earth to me. Haven't seen the programme but I'm sure if I were confined in a house with Katie Hopkins I wouldn't bother confronting her either as she's so aggressive and always has to have the last word, so no chance of any genuine discussion.

Katie Hopkins from what I've seen says what she thinks to a persons face, whether you agree with that or not. Nadia Sawahla tells everyone she does that and get is consistently bitching about Hopkins behind her back on camera. If she has wanted to come across as some sort of loveable peace maker she's failed miserably, because I just see her as a nasty person who bitches about people but never to their face.


Louisa.

I agree with Louisa. I think she has let herself down badly in this programme. She wasn't prepared to give Katie Hopkins the benefit of the doubt, although others have and actually like her. She teamed up with the very bitchy Perez Hilton, an american that told others " She's the most hated woman in Britain" (Hopkins), well maybe us British should decide that.


At last night's eviction she was booed when her name was called out. I predict her to be the next one out and that her friendship with Perez Hilton will end at that moment.

camberwell70 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What hair?



We are talking about Nadia Sawahla, are we not? So, Nadia Sawahla's hair. If you want to be contrary camberwell70, I would suggest that are many things you could choose to argue. The hair(of Nadia Sawahla - for those that need clarity), can only be compared to a crazed lunatic from the 18th century. Her personality matches said hair.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I always thought she was from Wandsworth? For the

> very same reasons Katie Hopkins (also in the

> house) dislikes her, I find her equally annoying.

> She has been supporting a fellow housemate called

> Perez Hilton (some sort of US columnist/blogger)

> who's been deeply disingenuous and annoying. Nadia

> dislikes Katie so much, and yet rarely confronts

> her to her face.


But more than happy to have a

> rant behind her back.


Really gets my back up.

>

> Louisa.


"But more than happy to have a rant behind her back"


Pots and kettles i'm thinking here - Ha ha!

speedbird Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The hair(of Nadia Sawahla - for those that need clarity), can

> only be compared to a crazed lunatic from the 18th

> century. Her personality matches said hair.


Ooh, bitchy. The very curly hair is probably due to her North African heritage rather than her state of mind, no?

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> speedbird Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The hair(of Nadia Sawahla - for those that need

> clarity), can

> > only be compared to a crazed lunatic from the

> 18th

> > century. Her personality matches said hair.

>

> Ooh, bitchy. The very curly hair is probably due

> to her North African heritage rather than her

> state of mind, no?


RPC, you are probably right, a bitch I may be(in this case). She (NS), incites rage in me. And the hair is just plain old, out of control frizzy hair. The sister (Julia) is clearly able to tame hers.... I rest.


Quite funny though... Big Brother.

I think she's aggressive. I think Perez is exceptionally annoying but he seems fairly harmless. She's gunning for him, saying nasty things behind his back and I don't like bullies. It looks like his aggressiveness towards her was in retaliation. This is the first episode I've seen so I don't really understand what he's done to deserve such hatred. Maybe I've missed something. It just seems she's spent the entire episode being quite nasty to him.

Phobic I suggest you have a glance back at this seasons earlier episodes. Perez Hilton forced one of the housemates to leave the house due to constant attention seeking and vulgar behaviour. Katie Hopkins was rather refrained from communication with him until this particular event occurred which forced out one of the lowliest people in the house. Perez has been back stabbing and manipulative throughout the show and is clearly on a mission to use his attention seeking to win the entire thing. Hopkins has not once back stabbed anyone, she's been consistently true to what she thinks about people including Nadia Sawahla to her face.


Louisa.

Ok - I'll take your word for it as I'm definitely not going to watch the episodes back! If he has acted in a way that forced someone to leave I guess it makes a bit more sense. That would explain why she's been so aggressive and nasty to him. Constantly bitching and saying horrible things behind his back, and to his face... I found it uncomfortable to watch. Almost as uncomfortable as him. He's really annoying!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://www.facebook.com/labourparty/posts/when-your-family-and-friends-ask-you-what-labour-has-achieved-so-far-send-them-t/1090481149116565/    Do you mean going from rhyming with Message to rhyming with Massage?  Or was it really a hard g to start with, rhyming, say,  with Farague/Faraig or Fararg?
    • Why on earth is there so much interest, and negativity, after a 100 days of a Labour government when we had 1000s of days of dreadful government before this with hardly a chat on this Website?  What is it that is suddenly so much greater interest? Here's part of a list of what they have done in a 100 days - it's from a Labour MP so obviously there is some bias, and mainly new Bills so yet to deliver/put into law.  This reminds me of the US election where the popular view was that Biden had achieved nothing, rather than leading the recovery after Covid, a fairer tax system, housing, supporting workers, dealing with community unrest following high profile racist incidents,  So if we think Starmer is ineffective and Labour incompetent then we are all going to believe it? I do feel sick after seeing Clarkson on Newsnight, playing to the gallery.  Surely Trump must have a high profile role for him on the environment and climate change  
    • Hi looking for a shed for my allotment. Can pick up
    • But do you not understand how tough farming is, especially post-Brexit when some of the subsidies were lost and costs have increased massively yet the prices farmers can charge has not? On the BBC News tonight they said pig farming costs had gone up 54% since 2019, cow farming costs up 44% and cereal costs up 43%. The NFU said that the margins are on average 0.5% return on capital. Land and buildings are assets that don't make money until you sell them...it's what you do with them that makes money and farms are struggling to make money and so many farms are generational family businesses so never realise the assets (one farmers on the news said his farm had been in the family since 1822) but will have to to pay tax for continuing the family business. On another news item tonight there was a short piece saying the government has said that 50,000 more pensioners will be forced into relative poverty (60% of the average income) due to the Winter Fuel Allowance removal which will rise to 100,000 more by 2027. James Murray from the Treasury was rolled out on Newsnight to try and defend that and couldn't. You can't give doctors 20%+ and push more pensioners into poverty as a result.  The problem for Labour is the court of public opinion will judge them and right now the jury is out after a series of own-goals, really poor communication and ill-thought-out idealogical policies. And don't ever annoy the farmers.....;-)  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...