Jump to content

I'm currently out of the office and will have....


Recommended Posts

I usually say I have limited access, so no-one can assume automatically I'll service their enquiries.

That way, if I'm keeping an eye open, I can pick / choose / divert as I see fit.

I rarely totally ignore work for an entire week unless I'm somewhere that physically prevents comms.

But I'm not gonna tell everyone at work that.

I am at home and will have limited access because vodafone's coverage is sh*t and my blackberry only connects in random 5 minute windows.


(also limited access might mean "I'm checking every couple of hours in breaks between meetings but might not be able to respond immediately. Or I'm on and off planes so won't get them all the time)



Maj. Major Major Major:

Sergeant, from now on, I don't want anyone to come in and see me while I'm in my office. Is that clear?


First Sgt. Towser:

Yes, sir. What do I say to people who want to come in and see you while you're in your office?


Maj. Major Major Major:

Tell them I'm in and ask them to wait.


First Sgt. Towser:

For how long?


Maj. Major Major Major:

Until I've left.


First Sgt. Towser:

And then what do I do with them?


Maj. Major Major Major:

I don't care.


First Sgt. Towser:

May I send people in to see you after you've left?


Maj. Major Major Major:

Yes.


First Sgt. Towser:

You won't be here then, will you?


Maj. Major Major Major:

No.


First Sgt. Towser:

I see, sir. Will that be all?


Maj. Major Major Major:

Also, Sergeant, I don't want you coming in while I'm in my office asking me if there's

anything you can do for me. Is that clear?


First Sgt. Towser: Yes, sir.

When should I come in your office and ask if there's anything I can do for you?


Maj. Major Major Major:

When I'm not there.


First Sgt. Towser:

What do I do then?


Maj. Major Major Major:

Whatever has to be done.


First Sgt. Towser:

Yes, sir.




DulwichFox

Some people at work have been using a facility which, when you e-mail them a notice comes up telling you when they are free. I purposely do not want to use it because I don't want people to know when I'm free so that they can pester me and then I won't be free. Being 'free' means this is the only time I've got to actually get on and do some actual work......

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> .....limited access to emails.

>

> Is something I see every day on auto replies. And

> it's bollocks. Unless your sailing to St Kilda or

> hiking round the remote alps everyone now has a

> smartphone,tablet,laptop. You're reading your

> email!

>

> Why not just be honest and say you're on holiday

> and don't want to be interrupted? Or not say it at

> all?

>

> We're stil adapting to the new world it seems....


I'm of the opinion that if you can afford to employ someone to say they have 'limited access to emails blah etc' whilst sailing round St. Kinda or hiking in the Alps then you're employing too many staff. The work still needs to be done and no-one is indispensable.


Edited for grammar :p

Not what I meant Lady D. Of course people can have time off to do those things, it was the fact that things can't be done without them being there (or the implication of that by them having "limited" access to emails. No-one is that important that decisions cannot be taken by others in their absence. Presuming that something needs to happen whilst they are off.


Holidays? 5 minutes for lunch would be nice. Having too little staff is just as bad as having too many.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://www.facebook.com/labourparty/posts/when-your-family-and-friends-ask-you-what-labour-has-achieved-so-far-send-them-t/1090481149116565/    Do you mean going from rhyming with Message to rhyming with Massage?  Or was it really a hard g to start with, rhyming, say,  with Farague/Faraig or Fararg?
    • Why on earth is there so much interest, and negativity, after a 100 days of a Labour government when we had 1000s of days of dreadful government before this with hardly a chat on this Website?  What is it that is suddenly so much greater interest? Here's part of a list of what they have done in a 100 days - it's from a Labour MP so obviously there is some bias, and mainly new Bills so yet to deliver/put into law.  This reminds me of the US election where the popular view was that Biden had achieved nothing, rather than leading the recovery after Covid, a fairer tax system, housing, supporting workers, dealing with community unrest following high profile racist incidents,  So if we think Starmer is ineffective and Labour incompetent then we are all going to believe it? I do feel sick after seeing Clarkson on Newsnight, playing to the gallery.  Surely Trump must have a high profile role for him on the environment and climate change  
    • Hi looking for a shed for my allotment. Can pick up
    • But do you not understand how tough farming is, especially post-Brexit when some of the subsidies were lost and costs have increased massively yet the prices farmers can charge has not? On the BBC News tonight they said pig farming costs had gone up 54% since 2019, cow farming costs up 44% and cereal costs up 43%. The NFU said that the margins are on average 0.5% return on capital. Land and buildings are assets that don't make money until you sell them...it's what you do with them that makes money and farms are struggling to make money and so many farms are generational family businesses so never realise the assets (one farmers on the news said his farm had been in the family since 1822) but will have to to pay tax for continuing the family business. On another news item tonight there was a short piece saying the government has said that 50,000 more pensioners will be forced into relative poverty (60% of the average income) due to the Winter Fuel Allowance removal which will rise to 100,000 more by 2027. James Murray from the Treasury was rolled out on Newsnight to try and defend that and couldn't. You can't give doctors 20%+ and push more pensioners into poverty as a result.  The problem for Labour is the court of public opinion will judge them and right now the jury is out after a series of own-goals, really poor communication and ill-thought-out idealogical policies. And don't ever annoy the farmers.....;-)  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...