Jump to content

police helicopter hovering over the rye circa 9pm

shoshntosh

By shoshntosh
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share

Recommended Posts

languagelounger

languagelounger

Posted
Posted

nunheadbelle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I wish they'd go away, it's doing my head in.

>

> Nunheadbelle


Well done - 10:35 - they've gone.


(This is probably a silly question, but what can they usefully see from up there? They were doing circuits of Nunhead and Peckham Rye, from a fairly great height, so they weren't following a vehicle. How can they tell a villain from the citizens of Nunhead - this is not joke question, pls refrain from Nunhead-unfriendly responses)

nunheadbelle

nunheadbelle

Posted
Posted

Aha! that's why the helicopter was hovering, an EDulite tunnelled out of ED and into Nunhead, popped up somewhere in Nunhead Cemetery... found it very peacful.


???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LOL ....As if an EDulite would be in Nunhead

Clarelp

Clarelp

Posted
Posted

I have to say, I am always confused by these threads, as a previous poster stated, there is at least one police helicopter hovering over ED/Peckham/Nunhead/Camberwell every week (I can see all 4 areas from my attic window!)


Why do people seeem so surprised by it? This is London!

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Have you never watched Sky Cops?!

Probably someone doin' a runner, heading for the duck pond...

you'll never catch me copper!


languagelounger Wrote:

>

> (This is probably a silly question, but what can

> they usefully see from up there? They were doing

> circuits of Nunhead and Peckham Rye, from a fairly

> great height, so they weren't following a vehicle.

> How can they tell a villain from the citizens of

> Nunhead - this is not joke question, pls refrain

> from Nunhead-unfriendly responses)

Michelle299

Michelle299

Posted
Posted
I also find that these helicopters head over to the dutch estate in dulwich at all unsociable hours for hours on end - can I find anyone to complain to as this wakes the family and I spend hours trying to get them back to sleep only to find its now time to get up!!!!
bigbadwolf

bigbadwolf

Posted
Posted
Oh sorry Michelleb, we'll just ask them to politly turn their engines off whilst hovering over east Dulwich shall we. I think basically what happened is that the home secretary was flicking off in her big subsidised couch when all of a sudden there was a knock at the door. 'Could you spare me some change for baby food please'. The home secretary handed over a tax payers bluey and sent her on her way. Upon realising that the begger was black and there for obviously not a constituant of Worcester she called special branch. "Jacqui Smith hand over money to the poor, pigs will fly", "really, well whats that helicopter doing there?".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Dave 3
      Be careful on the pavements...

      By Dave 3 · Posted

      It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Sue
      Be careful on the pavements...

      By Sue · Posted

      Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Dave 3
      Be careful on the pavements...

      By Dave 3 · Posted

      Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • Loutwo
      Franklins is being sold

      By Loutwo · Posted

      I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...