Jump to content

Recommended Posts

They didn,t used to be for grown ups they used to be for teenagers and early 20s, it's the whole grown up thing that has changed them. But despite my flaming I like the changes (Glastonbury early 90s again , no thanks) and they are great with kids - the family orientated ones anyway, wouldn't,t do a big one with mine

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They didn,t used to be for grown ups they used to

> be for teenagers and early 20s, it's the whole

> grown up thing that has changed them. But despite

> my flaming I like the changes (Glastonbury early

> 90s again , no thanks) and they are great with

> kids - the family orientated ones anyway,

> wouldn't,t do a big one with mine



Late teens/early 20's are grown-ups!

I meant there weren't loads of families with kids there. At least not when I went. If people had kids they left them at home with babysitters.

Colin Firth's D'arcy in Pride and prejudice. Sexy? NOOOOO.

Gravity (the film not the mysterious force that pulls two objects towards each other).

Baked beans.

Robin Williams RIP, only thing he did that I enjoyed was Mork and Mindy.

Champagne.

Wotsits and Monster Munch.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Park drive. Your list reads like it's from over a

> decade ago. I was making a joke



Oh right. So anything more than a decade old is off limits? I'll have to watch myself.

Off limits?


How do people leap to such assumptions?


I can comment about how stuck in the past you are without it being off limits no?


On the other hand if you are giving out about ten year old specifics...you hsvent exactly got your finger on the pulse


Or maybe you are actually Louisa

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Off limits?

>

> How do people leap to such assumptions?

>

> I can comment about how stuck in the past you are

> without it being off limits no?

>

> On the other hand if you are giving out about ten

> year old specifics...you hsvent exactly got your

> finger on the pulse

>

> Or maybe you are actually Louisa


So electronic gaming is a thing of the past as are PS4's etc? Maybe its you that doesn't have his finger on the pulse.

I find it funny how StraferJack still alludes to Parkdrive possibly being me.


On the topic of old people going to festivals I think it's incredibly cringe worthy when someone past a certain age engages in stuff aimed at younger people in a very awkward attempt to rekindle youth. Red face factor times 1000.


Louisa.

Christ above


I don't think park drive and Louisa are same person


I thought PD made a list of things which were not just slightly pass? but well out of date. And that's fine. That's ok. He is well entitled to do so


But in the interst of dialogue,humour,engagement I made a jolly play on how out of date the list was. No malice. Normally I would expect some "chuckles" back. But no. Dead eyed, humourless offence


But "out of order"??? Really.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...