Jump to content

Recommended Posts

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Would the panel feel safe buying a kebab in

> Peckham after the show?

> BRILLIANT


The questioner with the 'if I was chocolate I'd eat myself' face? The cameras going back to her more than was necessary.

No PR, not BRILLIANT, it was dull and obvious I thought. And was she related to the director?

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good point made from the guy whose office

> overlooks Jacqui Smith's "main home" - she's there

> 3 days a week, 35 weeks a year


Didn't keep a log, though did he?

Couldn't actually back it up with anything other than the sort of gobshite pub talk 'percentages' that are carelessly chucked about by shite-gobbed pub talkers every day in every pub everywhere.

I won't go so far as to say he's a Taplin, but he is a w@nker.


On mature consideration, I withdraw 'a w@nker' and substitute 'speccy pube head'.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know it's mean, but I couldn't help laughing at

> the guy who was almost crying about having been

> mugged 3 times in 18 years.



I kind of know what you mean Keef, and I was wondering to myself if there were any potential muggers watching last night going to themselves "and tonight Matthew it will be FOUR times in those 18 years"


Bloke who annoyed me is the one who went on about the Crime (murders and so on) in Camberwell, how to make an area look even less desirable on national television in 30 seconds flat

well done mate for reversing all the recent hard work done to improve the image of Camberwell by organisations like the SE5 Forum, Camberwell Renewal, Camberwell SNT's, the Camberwell Traders Association and others. (6)

I did raise a question about Jacqui Smith's ?116K expenses which was roundly ignored by the panel. They seemed more concerned about which was the primary residence and whether she'd broken the spirit of the rules.


?116K people. And she stays in one room at her sisters house.


If she comes out of it this scot free, I want to be first in the line to rent a room to the next MP moving to ED.

I thought the statistic about Camberwell crime was startling - but glad it was aired as you cannot sweep these things under the carpet and hope they go away. That guy who asked the question should be applauded - as it puts Camberwell back on the Radar.


The question about the Kebab was irrelevant for a panel who knew nothing about the area first hand. Richard Dimbleby could have reversed the question at the audience, and asked for a show of hands on, how many people in the audience would feel safer walking at night in Peckham than in their home towns back in Bristol, Leeds, Bradford, Manchester, Birmingham, Glasgow or overseas etc..

bon3yard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, Rabble Rouser. Thats the one. I'd quite

> happily lock him and Kelvin Mackenzie in a room

> together with no food or water see how long it

> takes for them to eat each other.


Now THERE'S a show Bon3yard, if you're not in television, why not?

It also would confirm what I've been saying for ages that their only use is a source of protein if you're starving.

I agree my "Brilliant" post was a bit tongue in cheek which - as I was writing as it was on - was a bit pointless. Anyway, I was also disappointed in the end, because Dimbleby himself was a bit sneering I felt. As for Piers Morgan, whilst I agree about the negative points made about him, I sometimes feel that if most MPs could get away with it, they would say a lot of the same things but for their imposed political correctness constraints.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Gold men’s wedding band and signet ring suspected to have come off outside of William Rose, Moxons or Bora on Lordship Lane on Friday 9th January during the day. Please get in touch if found. Reward if returned!
    • Hello,  I am interested to know people's opinion regarding dogs left tied up outside shops.  As I am hoping most dog owners are aware of how high risk it is now for dog theft.  People's houses are targeted for dog theft, even waiting to have a dog out in their back gardens, even for few minutes, to steal.  This is a very common occurrence now, as is breaking into properties to steal dogs.  The reasons behind dog theft varies, from using to breed, sell on, to use to sit whilst asking for money, (obviously not all people asking for money are dog thieves & may well own their own dog) and for dog bait for fighting.  This is not me being a drama queen, it is there for anyone to research regarding dog theft.  So would you leave your dog tied up outside a shop? 
    • I don't know if any of the cricket or tennis clubs also have little gyms. There are also pilates studios on Melbourne Grove, Blackwater St, North Cross Rd and even the community hall of the church on Calton Ave. The David Lloyd gym in Orpington is very luxurious and expensive.  
    • HI CPR Dave, I have to agree with Dogkennelhillbilly. We still have net migration into the country as per the Office of National Statistics- https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/internationalmigration It may go negative in a year or two if pundits specialising in this are correct, but it isn't yet. Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, I don't think your maths is correct. Southwark Council states total empty homes at 8,588 -https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/housing/southwark-has-over-8500-empty-homes/ the total number of homes is 135k. Which means 6.36% are empty. However, while canvassing came across an empty home which does not appear to have been appreciated by Southwark Council who are now investigating whether the empty Home Council Tax Premium should have been applied for the last 10+ years. It seems likely the 8,588 is under reporting the number of empty homes.  Infill sites are defined by most public bodies was non strategic sites from a development perspective. The railway yard and other sites are in the Southwark strategic plans and thus would not be infill sites.  Tall buildings planted into lower surrounding suburban areas is a subjective matter whether they are viewed as out of character for the area. It is factually true that I think they are out of character. Equally you have no qualms about such tall buildings being planted into the SE22 area. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...