Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,


Myself and my girlfriend are thinking about moving to the area, but we have one major concern, and that being the trainline. Where we live currently (Westcombe Park, the top Dartford line), the trains are regularly 15- 20 minutes late and you sometimes you can't even get on them as they are too crowded/ don't turn up at all (the joys of living on a Southeastern trainline).


Do you have similar problems from East Dulwich, namely, are they cancelled often and more importantly, can you even get on them? The 749 i think it is in the morning would look like the ideal train to get as it gets to L Br at a decent time.


Thanks for your help


Def

There is a 7:51 from East Dulwich, is that the one you mean? It may be 7:49 from North Dulwich, perhaps.


It's on time (give or take a couple of minutes) most of the time, it's probably only seriously knackered less than once a month. I can always get onto it, sometimes even get a seat if I board at the back.


The service has often been down on Sundays... not sure if this is set to continue into the future.

I have to agree generally on time and if late by only a few minutes.. The 8.05 if you can stretch it out a little further time wise is great as there is far more room and generally you will get a seat whereas the 7.51 can get a little crowded but everyone always gets on..
Does anyone have the timetable for the trains from ED station, or an internet link to the timetable. I never catch the train as an infrequent user, you can't just turn up and wait, as often the wait is too long. However if I had the timetable at home I may use it more often. Skip.
If you keep Peckham Rye station within range of where you live it basically doubles the number of trains in and out of London Bridge because two lines meet between East D and Peck Rye. You can pretty much always get on whatever train you want, often seats available even at peak times if you get on at the back end (why doesn't everyone?). Usually on time or within 5 minutes anyway, and there's a train 0753, 0756, 0808(?), 0816, 0826, 0838 etc - pretty frequent at peak.

skip I dont have an official timetable but these are the ones I know in the AM.. As for the PM I go to Peck Rye so just turn up at LB and there is generally a train..


7.14

7.19

7.29

7.51

8.05

8.15


If you go on to the tfl website you should be able to print out all the trains..

or pop down to the rail station and pick up a timetable from there..


I just went and did a journey planner and got all the trains between 6.30AM - 9.30AM, its not hard, so you could do that too and just write them down on a post it and stick it somewhere...


6.12

6.39

7.03

7.14

7.19

7.29

7.51

8.05

8.14

8.35

8.41

8.56

9.16

9.20

9.27

  • 9 months later...
Been a while since the last post in this thread but I started taking the train from Peckham Rye to London Bridge this week and the trains seem to have been moderately delayed most of the time. Is this usual for this time of year? One of the reasons given was the 'wrong conditions' on the tracks. I'm thinking of switching to the bus instead but are they any better at the moment? I know there are works on Borough High St.

mikese22 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Surely even with a 'moderate' delay it's quicker

> by train?


Of course it is quicker. I am just wondering if it is always like this as nearly every day this week there has been delays. Ruffers, I got to the platform at around 08:02 on Wednesday, I think, and the next train was due at 08:18. I am taking the train from Peckham Rye so it is very packed when it arrives. With the amount of time spent waiting and the travel cost being more than double the bus is it worth chancing the traffic to take the bus instead?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am delighted to hear the development was approved.  In my opinion, the UK is building far too little housing. And unless we build on green belts, the only solution is to increase the density of our cities, which is exactly what this scheme achieves.  Where I'm from (France), planning is generally looser and in my home city it's common to see single dwellings being razed to make way for a 5-6 story block of flats, even in city centres. Does it change the character of the local area? For sure! But I don't see another way to provide the supply to meet demand and provide ample supply of housing for a growing population. My personal experience is that in the UK, there is a lot more time spent on consultations, on achieving a perfect outcome for everyone. This results in generally better and more harmonious building than in France, but it makes things slower and more costly, with the need to coordinate many consultants.  It's interesting to compare France and the UK as they have similar populations and population growth, with an economy centred on a huge capital city. When you look at the number of houses/flats built in France and the UK over the past 10 years, the result is pretty striking. # France UK Difference 2023 298,100 150,370 -147,730 2022 392,100 182,070 -210,030 2021 410,000 177,160 -232,840 2020 368,800 129,440 -239,360 2019 387,700 153,000 -234,700 2018 401,200 168,610 -232,590 2017 434,700 164,110 -270,590 2016 370,000 155,150 -214,850 2015 341,000 148,150 -192,850 2014 336,900 140,760 -196,140 2013 357,900 124,790 -233,110 2012 382,300 101,020 -281,280 Total 4,480,700 1,794,630 -2,686,070 Average 373,392 149,553 -223,839 When HS1 was built, the French engineers (it was built with the French high-speed signalling) were surprised at how Brits wanted to "gold-plate" everything. The UK arguably has the best, most effective, more reliable, more well-equipped high-speed line in the world, but we've only got 68 miles of it and it cost 2.5 times what it cost the French to build a line extension at the same time.  In my view, there's no magic wand: just deciding who will be the losers. In France, people in established neighbourhoods my lose out as they see them change dramatically, while the new entrants benefit from a much higher supply of housing (and thus cheaper housing). In the UK, we give greater priority to preserving the lifestyle and amenity of the established dwellers over the new entrants who lose out as the supply is choked and prices are higher. A final point of comparison would be the price per square foot of property in Greater Paris is £467 while in Greater London it's £667 - 30% cheaper!
    • This web page lists some companies that recycle CDs https://www.reducereuserecycle.co.uk/where_can_I_recycle/cds_and_dvds.php  
    • I heard it as well, woke me up, very strange.  I don't care for myself but I do worry for people with children and animals, it is a nuisance and happens more and more nowadays.
    • Has that ever actually happened? The bags are quite bright, and don't blend in with the pavement, so are quite noticeable. But surely there can't be many  cases where someone has bothered to put the s**t in a bag,  but then just leaves the bag on the pavement?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...