Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Legally - for the purposes of this case - she

> consented. End of.


That's my thinking. It just seems that the media and a good proportion of the public, represented on here, still want to find him guilty.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Huggers Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > She'd fallen over in the takeaway. left her

> > handbag there. That is pretty drunk. The room

> was

> > dark. She may not even have known a second man

> was

> > having sex with her. Maybe that was part of

> their

> > 'joke'in 'bagging a drunk one'.

>

>

> But he can't have known about what happened in the

> take away.

>

> Don't want to sound like I'm defending the sleaze

> bag, just find the whole thing grim yet

> interesting.


the CTV shows him passing her as she was fallen on the floor although neither he nor her could remember that in court.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Legally - for the purposes of this case - she

> consented. End of.



Er, no, that's not what the case determined. The verdict means that there was not sufficient evidence to determine either that she hadn't consented or that he didn't believe she had consented.


Her consent wasn't proven to have happened.


Statements like this show exactly why this case is highly worrying.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Whilst I agree to some extent,  are they going to have some kind of checkpoint?  I can't see how this could work in practice. Surely Southwark residents go to these places quite frequently as well, particularly Tate Modern?  Will we have to take proof of residency every time we go out? What happens when family are with us who don't live in Southwark? Will other London boroughs start doing the same thing? Will Southwark residents be charged a tourist tax to visit "tourist attractions" in other areas, eg the V&A and the British Museum?
    • A shout out for Mark, owner of Pure Plumbers. 07970 971510 They're well established in the Sevenoaks area, but have recently started doing more work in SE London.  Did some v quick and efficient bathroom and boiler fixes for me; have also seen some of the bathrooms he's built, which have a nice attention to detail. Jessica    
    • Totally agree regarding not supporting chains. Gail’s was fine but last time I went in Feb this year, actually walked out Fayetteville looking at menu and waiting 15 minutes to even get glass of water and not busy at all. Staff gone down hill - sooner it goes the better… Always prefer to support non chains - so many lovely places with good food to choose from with pleasant staff who know about customer service and sadly, non English which says a lot for our culture, pubs are also becoming abit of a hit and miss affair but maybe just unlucky. At the end of the day all about the chef. Still abit unclear where new place is located - is it down the road from Goose Green where parade of shops are before Peckham Rye?  
    • Surely only where the local businesses offer clear advantages, otherwise you are rewarding what should be failure. I want to be served by a better bakery than Gail's, not a worse but local independent one. Certainly give a local independent some time to get the offer right, but don't buy goods which are worse and or more expensive just because the outlet isn't a chain. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...