Jump to content

do you need to think tactically about the order of your primary school choices? Tedious thread alert


Recommended Posts

Sorry tedious thread alert!!


Can I just ask those who have already been through this process, is it more sensible to put down your schools in order of preference according to your ACTUAL preference, even if they seem unlikely, or should you be more tactical than that?

ie, we live on Upland Rd and would be pretty unlucky not to get Goodrich at the distance we're at, (but who knows in East D!) so if Heber would be our 2nd choice, does it make sense to put it down 2nd even though I know we would never get offered it as too far away and it's not even going down as our first choice? Ditto Goose Green and Bessemer? Given that loads of people who have these schools as there nearest school / 1st choice are not even going to get a place, is it a waste to put them down as your 2nd and 3rd choices, rather than the one you reckon realistically you have a more likely shot at for 2nd choice, which I guess would be Harris primary for us location wise, even if you prefer other schools further away? Any advice? Thanks!

You should put them in order of actual preference, you might want to think tactically about using your sixth choice as an insurance of somewhere that you think you might get a place eg an undersubscribed school, we did this with Hollydale where we got a place, you still go on waiting lists for your higher options but you get to choose rather than be given a school. We live on therapia and decided to take a place at the new harris school.
Thanks Mariamadeit, that's a useful bit of advice. I must admit I'm still in a quandary tho cos a couple of other people have replied saying the opposite - not to put schools in order of genuine preference but in order of likelihood by distance, confusing! Xx

You need to meet the system half-way i.e. put in some close schools, if distance is the only criteria category you fit in to. By this I mean you not applying on faith basis or some particular special needs basis.


Once you have your list put them in your true preferred order. The schools don't know your order and you get given the highest match on your list. E.g. if your 2nd, 4th and 5th schools all said yes we can offer a place then you would be given the 2nd school on your list.

I would put in actual preference - that way you will be on the waiting lists for all preferences above what you actually get (if they are southwark schools). There is loads of movement after the first round of offerings. As I understand it, where you put a school as preference has no standing on whether you get offered a place: Your child's name will be put forward to all the schools you put on the list with no preference marker and not at each school but on computer system in council offices. The computer will then list all the schools that would offer you a place based on the school's criteria and that years' applicants. You will then be offered the highest one of these on your list of preferences.


However, definately choose one you are almost certain to get into as your sixth choice....better that than be given one you don't know and is miles away. (Harris Primary is probably a realistic and good bet for your sixth choice I would have thought)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Absolute mugs. That's what they take you for.  
    • Trossachs definitely have one! 
    • A A day-school for girls and a boarding school for boys (even with, by the late '90s, a tiny cadre of girls) are very different places.  Though there are some similarities. I think all schools, for instance, have similar "rules", much as they all nail up notices about "potential" and "achievement" and keeping to the left on the stairs. The private schools go a little further, banging on about "serving the public", as they have since they were set up (either to supply the colonies with District Commissioners, Brigadiers and Missionaries, or the provinces with railway engineers), so they've got the language and rituals down nicely. Which, i suppose, is what visitors and day-pupils expect, and are expected, to see. A boarding school, outside the cloistered hours of lesson-times, once the day-pupils and teaching staff have been sent packing, the gates and chapel safely locked and the brochures put away, becomes a much less ambassadorial place. That's largely because they're filled with several hundred bored, tired, self-supervised adolescents condemned to spend the night together in the flickering, dripping bowels of its ancient buildings, most of which were designed only to impress from the outside, the comfort of their occupants being secondary to the glory of whatever piratical benefactor had, in a last-ditch attempt to sway the judgement of their god, chucked a little of their ill-gotten at the alleged improvement of the better class of urchin. Those adolescents may, to the curious eyes of the outer world, seem privileged but, in that moment, they cannot access any outer world (at least pre-1996 or thereabouts). Their whole existence, for months at a time, takes place in uniformity behind those gates where money, should they have any to hand, cannot purchase better food or warmer clothing. In that peculiar world, there is no difference between the seventh son of a murderous sheikh, the darling child of a ball-bearing magnate, the umpteenth Viscount Smethwick, or the offspring of some hapless Foreign Office drone who's got themselves posted to Minsk. They are egalitarian, in that sense, but that's as far as it goes. In any place where rank and priviilege mean nothing, other measures will evolve, which is why even the best-intentioned of committees will, from time to time, spawn its cliques and launch heated disputes over archaic matters that, in any other context, would have long been forgotten. The same is true of the boarding school which, over the dismal centuries, has developed a certain culture all its own, with a language indended to pass all understanding and attitiudes and practices to match. This is unsurprising as every new intake will, being young and disoriented, eagerly mimic their seniors, and so also learn those words and attitudes and practices which, miserably or otherwise, will more accurately reflect the weight of history than the Guardian's style-guide and, to contemporary eyes and ears, seem outlandish, beastly and deplorably wicked. Which, of course, it all is. But however much we might regret it, and urge headteachers to get up on Sundays and preach about how we should all be tolerant, not kill anyone unnecessarily, and take pity on the oiks, it won't make the blindest bit of difference. William Golding may, according to psychologists, have overstated his case but I doubt that many 20th Century boarders would agree with them. Instead, they might look to Shakespeare, who cheerfully exploits differences of sex and race and belief and ability to arm his bullies, murderers, fraudsters and tyrants and remains celebrated to this day,  Admittedly, this is mostly opinion, borne only of my own regrettable experience and, because I had that experience and heard those words (though, being naive and small-townish, i didn't understand them till much later) and saw and suffered a heap of brutishness*, that might make my opinion both unfair and biased.  If so, then I can only say it's the least that those institutions deserve. Sure, the schools themselves don't willingly foster that culture, which is wholly contrary to everything in the brochures, but there's not much they can do about it without posting staff permanently in corridors and dormitories and washrooms, which would, I'd suggest, create a whole other set of problems, not least financial. So, like any other business, they take care of the money and keep aloof from the rest. That, to my mind, is the problem. They've turned something into a business that really shouldn't be a business. Education is one thing, raising a child is another, and limited-liability corporations, however charitable, tend not to make the best parents. And so, in retrospect, I'm inclined not to blame the students either (though, for years after, I eagerly read the my Old School magazine, my heart doing a little dance at every black-edged announcement of a yachting tragedy, avalanche or coup). They get chucked into this swamp where they have to learn to fend for themselves and so many, naturally, will behave like predators in an attempt to fit in. Not all, certainly. Some will keep their heads down and hope not to be noticed while others, if they have a particular talent, might find that it protects them. But that leaves more than enough to keep the toxic culture alive, and it is no surprise at all that when they emerge they appear damaged to the outside world. For that's exactly what they are. They might, and sometimes do, improve once returned to the normal stream of life if given time and support, and that's good. But the damage lasts, all the same, and isn't a reason to vote for them. * Not, if it helps to disappoint any lawyers, at Dulwich, though there's nothing in the allegations that I didn't instantly recognise, 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...