Jump to content

Recommended Posts

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "And you obviously know best KK, being such an

> animal lover yourself."

>

> I don't proclaim to be above / below anyone in

> regards to animal 'loving' or anything else.

> I just commented on your holier-than-thou tone

> which came across as an unfair put-down of others.



I was being sarcastic based on a few of your past posts that I obviously haven't forgotten.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I disagree. Humans don't know how animals think as

> this video suggests.



So what do you think animals think AM?

And if nobody really knows, there's a good chance that they think exactly the same as the human in the video.

It is important to point out that comparing animals to humans is floored and has it own dangers. For example, should animals who attack other animals be punished in the same way humans are punished for attacking other humans? Also should humans be treated as some animals are: for example should elderly and frail humans be executed by lethal injection as some animals are or should feral children be neutered as cats and dogs are?

Robert Poste's Child, I am shocked by the aggression and contempt on this forum by yourself and other users. What is it I said?



Would you like to make a one way bet with me if I prove I am who I say I am? Bet me ?100?



I will disclose my details to the forum moderator who can then confirm that I am a current university lecturer at the university of London, but my condition is the moderator does not make my details known.


Do you accept Robert Poste's Child?

Well, you dirty my name and claim I am a troll but when challenged you say you are not interested.


I repeat: would you bet ?100 I am not a university lecturer?


Anyone can make claims and slander but are you willing to put your money where your mouth is? Or is this a case of throw mud and run?

Even I'm a little suspicous now Davis, and I have lost my temper at people accusing new posters of being fake. But no way would it bother me so much that I would feel the need to absolutely prove those people wrong. It's just a forum. Who cares what anyone thinks about who is who? And if some people choose to be rude to, or suspicious of new posters, then that's their problem. It's not worth wasting any time bothering with it.

Davis, that's not very logical - no one can 'dirty' your name as you are posting anonymously.


You claimed to be a University of London lecturer but for a relative newcomer your posts quickly became provocative, which gave me the impression you're looking to stir things up rather than have a genuine discussion.


Otta, fair point re picking up on use of language, but I think it's appropriate here as university lecturers not only have higher degrees but are expected to publish regularly on their subject. The OP's use of language and some of the comments seem to be at odds with this. (Note that I have heroically not commented on use of slander vs libel...)


I could be wrong, though.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Even I'm a little suspicous now Davis, and I have

> lost my temper at people accusing new posters of

> being fake. But no way would it bother me so much

> that I would feel the need to absolutely prove

> those people wrong. It's just a forum. Who cares

> what anyone thinks about who is who? And if some

> people choose to be rude to, or suspicious of new

> posters, then that's their problem. It's not worth

> wasting any time bothering with it.



Blah Blah, you have a point.


I just take offence to slander against me or others. I do not post much on forums and to be honest EDF is the first forum I have posted on for a few years and I forgot about some of the ignorant behaviour which occurs on forums. But as you said it is a just an internet forum... Never mind.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Even I'm a little suspicous now Davis, and I have

> lost my temper at people accusing new posters of

> being fake. But no way would it bother me so much

> that I would feel the need to absolutely prove

> those people wrong. It's just a forum. Who cares

> what anyone thinks about who is who? And if some

> people choose to be rude to, or suspicious of new

> posters, then that's their problem. It's not worth

> wasting any time bothering with it.


Crikey. You've mellowed since your earlier posts on this thread.

Please Davis & Robert Poste's Child..


This Thread is about Fox Hunting..


There is a Thread about Academics. (Davis)


If you both wish to continue your constant Bickering may I suggest you either

continue it there or find a School Playground where you can both scratch each others eyes out.


DulwichFox

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I disagree. Humans don't know how animals think

> as

> > this video suggests.

>

>

> So what do you think animals think AM?

> And if nobody really knows, there's a good chance

> that they think exactly the same as the human in

> the video.


How would I know what they think am? I would say there is no chance that they think the same as the human in the video. This man must have assumed the 'animal' he killed was like a human, with very bad results:


http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/severed-snake-head-kills-chef-cooking-cobra-soup-1462341

I will never agree with hunting animals for sport....


However I'd happily shoot grey squirrels and some of the neighbours' cats with an air pistol (too many of both). Well in my dreams anyway. And what ever it is does the runny shits in our front garden.....


We got a squirrel caught in a squirrel proof bird feeder last year. The thing was apoplectic. As they are pests you are supposed to dispose of them. This poor townie after trying to give it a heart attack with a cat scarer ended up prising open the feeder to let it free (and managing to avoid getting my fingers bitten off). I am such a light weight.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
    • The situation outside Oru is far worse with their large tables immediately adjacent to badly parked bikes using the bike racks there. And the lamppost also blocking the pavement.
    • Urgently looking for a garage in SE London - Brockley, Crofton Park, Catford, Lewisham, Honor Oak, Dulwich, Forest Hill, Sydenham, Deptford, New Cross, Hither Green or Lee would all work. Willing to pay market rent. Must be available long term. Please call Andrew on 07740 339669 if you have one available.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...