Jump to content

Recommended Posts

CGsteveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Where would all those simple minded country

> bumpkins be without all us sophisticated townsfolk

> dictating how they should behave?



Without the urban masses to buy their produce and subsidise their trade, the country lot would be living in caves worshipping all manner of false agricultural themed idols and eating their first born. Fuck them.

Hmmm but fox hunting on horses with hounds is not 'natural law' tho is it Robert. It's a man made construct for a thrill and/or sport. It is true that animals are guided by natural instinct, but human beings are not on that level. We do have a moral compass and the ability to be fair and compassionate if we want to be. The hounds are trained to hunt foxes. The horses trained to be ridden. Neither would do that without human intervention.

Are you for real? What do you even know about living in the countryside unless you've lived there.


As for foie gras, it is a well known fact that many meat eaters who have eaten meat all their lives and are quite happy to eat roast turkey, chicken curry, beef burgers, lamb shank, pork chops etc. refuse foie gras because of the excessive cruelty inflicted

I just can't understand how people that know how it is produced can eat it without feeling sick to the stomach.


ETA this reply is to misteaks post, not steveo's although his was bad enough.

And to think I used to live in ED, probably before you lot, and I must say I used to think the people were stupid then but now.....well I leave that up to you to decide.

The real question you should be asking or answering is what gives anyone the right to kill any animal just for fun/sport?

Yes I know that a lot worse things go on in the world, but that would open up a whole new can of worms, which I doubt anyone has the time to discuss on here

Eroguronansensu Wrote:

------------------------------------------------------

> The real question you should be asking or

> answering is what gives anyone the right to kill

> any animal just for fun/sport?

>


I've been asking this question for years. The correct answer is that nobody has the right.

The problem is that many people don't even care.

And that is the crux of the matter, we dont actually care enough to stand up and be counted, apathy has finally reached the lowest common denominator, as a life form we dont care what happens to the other life forms on their planet, because they have first dibs, unless of course your a born again then of course the planet is only 6000 years old......
Yes it's something that mystifies me too. That all kinds of excuses are given to justify what is essentially just another blood 'sport'....as though class and tradition make it somehow more civilised than dog or cockeral fighting etc. People don't oppose fox hunting because it's the upper classes wot do it! They oppose it because it's inhumane and pointless.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes it's something that mystifies me too. That all

> kinds of excuses are given to justify what is

> essentially just another blood 'sport'....as

> though class and tradition make it somehow more

> civilised than dog or cockeral fighting etc.

> People don't oppose fox hunting because it's the

> upper classes wot do it! They oppose it because

> it's inhumane and pointless.

Well said my fellow human

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are you for real? What do you even know about

> living in the countryside unless you've lived

> there.

>


What a blinkered argument. As it happens I grew up in the country, but do you really think no one has a right to an opinion if they haven't?


On foie gras, not all are produced by force-feeding. Some producers make an 'ethical' version which is based on the idea that geese naturally (that word again) over-feed and put on weight to prepare for migration.


http://www.meatinfo.co.uk/news/archivestory.php/aid/16463/Spanish_farmer_produces__91ethical_92_foie_gras.html


Again, I personally don't eat it because I don't much care for it, but I don't have a problem if the animals have been treated humanely.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


it's the upper classes wot do it!


Even twenty years ago half our local hunt in Cumbria turned up in pick-up trucks and vans. Don't assume all hunts are like the smart ones in the shires.

I personally would be outraged if the fox hunting ban was repealed. We have banned lots of things, and often in the face of huge protest, because they are ethically wrong. This really is the bleating of a small number of people, of whatever class, who think they have a divine right to do whatever they like. Chasing a fox and ripping it to pieces is inhumane and cruel, end of. And there is no longer any place for it in a civilised society.

Well said PokerTime...


Opposition to Legalising Hunting Remains at All Time High


The latest opinion polling from Ipsos MORI released this week shows that 80% of people in Britain think that fox hunting should remain illegal and the numbers are even higher for deer hunting and hare hunting.


Those figures have continued to rise since the polling began in 2008 and are now at an all-time high.


Hunting has only ever been practised by a small proportion of the population.

Nothing could be described as a tradition if the vast majority of people never engaged in that activity, have shown little interest in it as a pastime and expressed little support for its continuation as a legal activity.


Above and beyond that, whatever the pro-hunt lobby say, there is a much more genuine, compelling, enduring and strongly supported tradition that runs through the fibre of the people of this country and that is that we are a nation of animal lovers.


We detest the idea of inflicting pain and death on an innocent creature if the purpose of that cruelty is simply for pleasure.



http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/michael-stephenson/fox-hunting-ban_b_6373052.html?utm_hp_ref=tw

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> aquarius moon Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Are you for real? What do you even know about

> > living in the countryside unless you've lived

> > there.

> >

>

> What a blinkered argument. As it happens I grew up

> in the country, but do you really think no one has

> a right to an opinion if they haven't?

>

> On foie gras, not all are produced by

> force-feeding. Some producers make an 'ethical'

> version which is based on the idea that geese

> naturally (that word again) over-feed and put on

> weight to prepare for migration.

>

> http://www.meatinfo.co.uk/news/archivestory.php/ai

> d/16463/Spanish_farmer_produces__91ethical_92_foie

> _gras.html

>

> Again, I personally don't eat it because I don't

> much care for it, but I don't have a problem if

> the animals have been treated humanely.



RPC, if you read my post again you will see that it wasn't a general comment, but one made in reply to a specific post that contained derogatory remarks about people living in the countryside.

This has nothing to do with to foxes - when you focus on the act, you miss the point. Start a thread on fois gras or whaling of whatever crap you need to get you through the day, but filling a foxhunt topic with emotional minutae and wiki sourced filler ensures that we never get to the meat of things.


We Ned more a academics on the forum..oh hang on a minute...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...