Jump to content

Local Lothario (Lounged)


FelicityNormal

Recommended Posts

I'm just trying to wrap all this up in a dossier for master Sam Masters (ace reporter) at the SLP. There are two lotharios that own businesses on Lordship Lane. One of them has a dose, and has passed it on to at least one acquaintance of FlickNormal. One of them gave Postmodern a real good time and then had a pop at her sister; this may or may not be the same guy who has the dose, but he is definitely married with kids and pretends he isn't until he is waxing his moustache in post-coital triumph. One of them has been posting on here, but not under the user name "InfectedShagger".


Is that about it? If I was investigations editor, I'd be thinking honeytrap, covert filming, make our excuses and leave. See if the Screws wants it first to clear a bit of wedge, otherwise run it as a DPS on Tuesday after the stabbing league tables.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> FelicityNormal Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > He has tried it on with me

> > but I did not succumb yet - and with what I now

>

> > know, I will never succumb.

>

> I think you're protesting too much Flick. I reckon

> underneath it all you are one smitten kitten.

> But please remember if you do decide to surrender

> your flower to him, then I beg you, take

> precautions.

> Don't tell him your real name and make sure the

> phone number you give him is the Yee Wah in Barry

> Road.

>

> I just love the fact that it's the STD that would

> stop her, not the fact he's already shagged her

> mate!


That's modern gals for you Keef. I blame that Germaine Greer myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ted Max Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm just trying to wrap all this up in a dossier

> for master Sam Masters (ace reporter) at the SLP.

> There are two lotharios that own businesses on

> Lordship Lane. One of them has a dose, and has

> passed it on to at least one acquaintance of

> FlickNormal. One of them gave Postmodern a real

> good time and then had a pop at her sister; this

> may or may not be the same guy who has the dose,

> but he is definitely married with kids and

> pretends he isn't until he is waxing his moustache

> in post-coital triumph. One of them has been

> posting on here, but not under the user name

> "InfectedShagger".

>

> Is that about it? If I was investigations editor,

> I'd be thinking honeytrap, covert filming, make

> our excuses and leave. See if the Screws wants it

> first to clear a bit of wedge, otherwise run it as

> a DPS on Tuesday after the stabbing league tables.



Fantastic!!>:D<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will a bidding war now break out between the News Of The World and the Daily Mail to get the exclusives on the Lordship Lane Kennel club ;-) - how many shops are operating as fronts for afternoon pursuits whilst 'late lunch' is dangled over the door.


It's an eye opener if you ever walk down Lordship Lane during a week day, the number of young mums pushing their prams up and down Lordship Lane without a shopping bag in sight... now it all starts to make sense! ;-)


I've always wanted to have my own shop - but had always been held back by what to sell, now I know it's gonna be me!! And yes I will be imposing safeguards starting with a 2 foot wide door entrance ;-)


Sorry if anyone finds any of that offensive, it just sort of rolled off the keyboard :-$ oops...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I the only one that noticed these two posts following directly on from each other??


Posted by: postmodern Today, 04:17PM


He is very good in bed.


Posted by: *Bob* Today, 04:17PM


FelicityNormal Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is it such a good call to have sex with someone

> you're unsure about - condom or no condom?


Yes - but only in the ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I have been wondering why it is not possible for a female (even of advanced years and dilapidation) to venture onto Lordship Lane without being creeped at non-stop.


I have been trying to find a tastefully designed badge that says 'I HAVE COME INTO HERE TO WORK YOU ********, WHAT'S MORE I HAVE A DEADLINE, AND ALL I WANT IS THE COFFEE I HAVE PAID YOU FOR, ******** OFF".


But now I don't know, really, since apparently an alarmingly large number of the women to be found on Lordship Lane, are in fact, very foolish whores. I would go back to the University Library, but that the males are even peskier in there.


What about the convent on Forest Hill Road, is it still open? Do they have a quiet room to let, does anyone know.


Also, Ted Max, I am adding this because I can't be bothered to post on here more than once, the people here are mad indeed, but of them all, I am counting you the maddest. ha!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jaybee82 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are you biffy? Sorry I'm going to bite all over

> this. So tell me, how would a bloke go about

> getting your number? Sounds very tough indeed.

>

> What on earth is the world coming to?!



Jay, I think it would help if he were actually SINGLE and wanted to get to know the lady other than just having sex ( because he is married) to get most girls numbers, there are ways of going about it.

I am sure most of us do not mind being chatted up but there are ways of doing it. With places likes shops, restaurants etc you have to make sure that the person is interested in you before jumping in and asking for a number and then constantly hassle the person everytime they have to enter the establishment otherwise you risk losing a customer. Usually it is pretty obvious if two people have an attraction for each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I digressed from the 'Dulwich Deviant' slightly.


I didnt mean hassle just anyone, clearly there is a time and place. All I'm saying is if the bloke seems normal and just engages in a bit of banter with you, how can that be considered being creepy? I might be lambasted for saying it, but I dont see any harm in it at all.


Having said that, I wouldn't do it so I guess that speaks volumes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jaybee82 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe I digressed from the 'Dulwich Deviant'

> slightly.

>

> I didnt mean hassle just anyone, clearly there is

> a time and place. All I'm saying is if the bloke

> seems normal and just engages in a bit of banter

> with you, how can that be considered being creepy?

> I might be lambasted for saying it, but I dont see

> any harm in it at all.

>

> Having said that, I wouldn't do it so I guess that

> speaks volumes.



I have no problems with that, I am usually very poite and talk to everyone who talks to me, and I hope if they did ask me out and I refused they would not take it personally instead of trying to wear me down and talk me into going out with them! ( yes, happens to lots of women sadly!). Most women would be flattered to be chatted up and I do think it would be good if more men took control and asked ladies out but as I said, time and place and also the ones who don't give up should learn to take the hint and move on.

I just need someone I actually LIKE and FANCY to ask me out instead of old pervs, rude boys and married men!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yeah. He told me I was gagging to 'hop on' to his cock. This was within 1 day of me first clapping eyes on him


jaybee82 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> OK, seconded. Didnt realise people tried to 'wear

> you down'...that does sound pretty cringe. I did

> have a chinese woman ask me to marry her once (no

> lie) which I thought was quite a nice gesture.

> Happy to say she didnt try to force me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FelicityNormal Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In the course of him telling me how 'up for it'

> British women are


So what you're saying Flick is that essentially you brought it upon yourself. I take it that the gentleman in question sprung from Latin loins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Toss of a coin for all but two of those fixtures. Very tough!
    • Week 10 fixtures...   Saturday 2nd November Newcastle United v Arsenal AFC Bournemouth v Manchester City Ipswich Town v Leicester City Liverpool v Brighton & Hove Albion Nottingham Forest v West Ham United Southampton v Everton Wolverhampton Wanderers v Crystal Palace   Sunday 3rd November Tottenham Hotspur v Aston Villa Manchester United v Chelsea   Monday 4th November Fulham v Brentford
    • More interested in the future than the past. 
    • The plans The developer Berkeley Homes have submitted a planning application to redevelop the Aylesham Centre close to the junction of Peckham High Street and Rye Lane, containing Morrison’s supermarket, car park, & petrol station, Aylesham shopping arcade and most of that side of Rye Lane between Hanover Park and Peckham High Street. The application is for a mixed housing, retail, leisure and commercial development, in buildings ranging from 5 to 20 storeys. Impact Local people who have studied the detailed plans think that the development would dominate the historic town centre which has evolved since the 18th century, and would ruin the Conservation Area which was awarded in 2011 'to preserve and enhance its character and appearance'. More than 65% of the homes to be built in this unimaginative over-bearing development will be unaffordable by most people who live in Southwark, and provide inadequate open and green space for this part of Peckham. Need for discussion This is such an important issue for south London that it needs wide discussion before the Council Planning Committee takes its decision (not before next Spring). A free on-line talk and discussion to clarify the heritage issues we all need to think about is being held on Monday 11th November 7-8.30pm. All will be welcome. Please register on this link: https://Defend-Peckhams-Heritage-2024.eventbrite.co.uk There are several other key issues raised by the plans which are being examined in the Aylesham Community Action (ACA) campaign. You can find the link to all that and other useful information here: www.linktr.ee/acapeckham The zoom session is being arranged by Peckham Heritage the local group that has grown from the community work alongside the restoration of nine historic buildings in Peckham High Street through the Townscape Heritage Initiative. We hope that EDF members who value local heritage will be able to attend the session to hear and take part in the discussion, and report back to this topic so the discussion can continue.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...