Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If you argued that society considers promiscuity to be delinquent, and that being a Lothario shows a lack of consideration for the well being of others, then you could argue that it was defamation. If it suggested an element of sexual harassment then it would be damaging for his business.


It wouldn't be me arguing it mind, it would be lawyers who cost more money than the adminstrator posesses. It wouldn't matter if he won or lost, he'd be poor.

I've been visiting a muso forum for about 6 years now, and if the libus thing you are touting were a serious threat I would be in guantanamo bay now getting water boarded. However I resect your experience and judgment.


Thing is, their are other derogatory comments about another establishment within this thread, why hasn't that been edited out.? you cant be half baked about policing peoples comments. or can ya........

Its only a forum and people do get heated, and say some really inflamatory things to each other. I have first hand experiences from this place. On the otherhand it's all part of it I suppose. Some do take it to a really serious level though. I've always treated these places as a platform to take the piss sometimes. But I wouldnt want to really upset people into wanting to persu vengence through the legal system. Id rather meetup for a beer or fisticuffs over the park....
I don't think it's libel if what you are saying is true, and in this case it is true. However, I will not publish the man's name on here. That said, he is something of a danger for several reasons. I am astonished more of you have not had horrible run-ins with him.

Hi Huguenot,


What's your thoughts on the libel situation re. BBW's comment, afterall an establishment is named in the post?..

For the record my original post was very firmly tongue in cheek (no pun intended) as anyone who frequents that establishment will understand...;-)


Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi red devil and Mickecg, unfortunately Asset's

> right, and the 'allegedly' isn't defence. Only

> 'fair comment' and legal proof are defences.

> Neither are applicable in this situation, and it's

> highly defamatory.

>

> I don't think you guys were regulars when the

> Forum had its last run in with libel, and it gets

> very messy very quickly.

>

> May I volunteer that you could go back and edit

> your posts to avoid any mention of anything that

> could identify the chap? Even cryptic

> identification is a no-no. If you can tell who he

> is by any means, then we all go down.

FelicityNormal Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It involves an individual purposely spreading a

> life-threatening STD, among other things.


Whoa - that's a pretty damning accusation! Do you have proof of this? If so then surely that is a criminal offence and should be reported. If not....................

FelicityNormal Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It involves an individual purposely spreading a

> life-threatening STD, among other things.



I think reckless or intentional transmission are criminal offences, so the police could be involved. If that's the case, better to involve them and do something to put a stop to it than scaremongering on a forum surely...

This individual has not had the chance to give me anything as I turned him down but I've since discovered that he's been with two local women I know and one of them now has health problems as a result. Wondering if he is purposely trying to harm people or he is just randy as hell and being reckless.

FelicityNormal Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This individual has not had the chance to give me

> anything as I turned him down but I've since

> discovered that he's been with two local women I

> know and one of them now has health problems as a

> result. Wondering if he is purposely trying to

> harm people or he is just randy as hell and being

> reckless.


Randy as hell and being reckless is NOT the same as " an individual purposely spreading a

> life-threatening STD, among other things"


Such comments are inflammatory at the least!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • As well as the above, has anyone else noticed the massive amounts of gum being spat out all over as well as marking pavements? This is not only disgusting as gum will be laced with human germs and saliva but also places a large cleaning cost on already stretched services. Why do humans insist on spitting out gum onto the pavements? Why can't they dispose of it in a bin or take it home?
    • I think it’s often a lack of attention. I’ve seen owners a few times around the area and in the park not pick up and it’s been because they’re not paying attention to their dog(s) - distracted by their children/friend/phone - and their dog is behind them off lead and has quickly squeezed one out unseen. Obviously I point it out to the owner. The other gripe is that even if mess is picked up, it often leaves marks and streaks on the pavement that you equally wish to avoid stepping in. Better than a big chunky stool but still very annoying and can get in your shoe. 
    • Thank you for the kind comments see u after the weekend 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...