Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Raquel Cruz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A big lounge with delightful refreshments served

> throughout the day... where the forumites can keep

> up with their postings...

>

> Masks will be provided.

>

> FACT


Yes, yes but will there be a Wimpy bar Franchise?

Will they serve Benders and Chocolate Bowlers?

Well, go on Giggi, it's over to you.

You were staring at the ceiling. Moos introduced the high-powered water pistols motif.

It's this sort of stuff that could get you a column in Loaded you know.

Column? Lord only knows what you two'll make of that.

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What we need to ask ourselves in this situation is

> this. What would Princess Anne do?


According to Ted, she'd frown like you. While a young Judy Dench was your smiling lady-in-waiting.

But, neither of you were ever seen in the same room together. Uncanny.

I don't know how Ted does it, but he do.

Ted and I posted above at the same time.

It looks as though when you put the two posts together, that maybe there was an implication that a liason might have taken place between the Princess Royal and a lady-in-waiting.

I mean go back and look at it.

Ted, 'turn that frown upside down'? With a previous mention of Dame Judy Dench smiling? There's only one way that's going to be heading.

Ted, I've enjoyed your company, but I'm pretty certain there are still laws about treason, and I reckon this is as treasoness as it gets.

Jesus, even Lord Haw-Haw never went this far, and they hanged him.

If you're looking in Your Majesty, I remain your loyal servant, that stuff I said in your son's pub (you know The Prince's Head) about being a republican and reckoning that your London home would bring in more 'invisible exports' as a Wetherspoons was nothing more than the drink talking.

Queen Elizabeth II. As I typed I bowed. I think that proves my loyalty.

But, Elizabeth Regina, ir I may call you that, there are those amongst us who may seek to do you down, and if anyone should end up in the Tower Of London (as a captive rather than a day visitor) then you might want to put your people onto a certain person, whose details can be found above.

And Ma'm, if I may say, well done for staying in and not allowing the second to the throne access.

If it please you M'am, I'm in agreement with your husband that your heir might well be a 'big-eared namby-pamby c*ntbollox', though his remarks about Chinese people still make me uncomfortable.

Unles of course that's treasoness? If it is, then 'slitty-eyed' all the way.

I remain your humble, obedient, humble and loyal servant in humility.

You know, like that Paul Burrell.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...