Jump to content

Recommended Posts

dulwichmum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sweet Mr Honk,

>

> Indeed I am not Neil Boorman, and nor would I ever

> want to be. OHMYGOD! He writes for The Guardian

> (it's not for everyone darling...) he has fluffy

> facial stubble and his Human League hair do is

> frightfully last year.


I was of course referring to his more salient tome, The Shoreditch T*at..


(I've never been on a forum where swearwords are censored before. Good Christ.)

Honk Wrote,


(I've never been on a forum where swearwords are censored before. Good Christ.)


Thats not the only thing thats gonna !freak! !you! !out! about this place Dude, Delusions of Grandeur are riffe, and some of em have got a fetish about spelling mistakes. SHHH! (I think they are the ones that work in the nursery)....


Other than that it's very entertaining.

To reply to the OP, sorry to hear that, Shosh (and Tosh). That area can suck at night, principally because people who like to attack people in dark secluded areas tend to hang around the dark secluded areas.


Best avoid the dark secluded areas, I'd say. The roads aren't that bad to cycle on (Willowbrook Rd and Peckham Hill St will get you to more or less the same location) and TBH I'd rather cycle slowly and carefully along the middle of the road than try and get through Surrey Canal Path again after dark.


Hope Tosh gets well soon.


: P

Cassius Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It 'could' happen anywhere in London, but if it

> happened in Dalston or Hackney there wouldn't be

> much point in posting it on the EDF.


What about if it happened in north Peckham? what then?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I hate the idea of someone with a genuine disability losing money, it's heart-breaking. I thought the whole idea of these cuts was to get kids with mental health issues, which we used to call 'the human condition', off benefits and into a job. Before anyone says anything, I'm not talking about people with severe autism.  If the tests are so astringent, Spartacus, how come healthy youngsters with anxiety are getting benefits? It's ludicrous.  This from The Times:  Then there is mental health. This is the fastest-growing category of claim; anxiety and depression is now the single biggest reason to claim PIPs, accounting for 16 per cent of spending. Including problems such as autism and ADHD, there are 1.4 million people claiming for “psychiatric disorders”, almost 40 per cent of the total.   NHS figures on Thursday found that 23 per cent of people of working age now have a mental disorder, up from 18 per cent a decade ago, rising to 26 per cent in 16 to 24 year-olds. Young people are most likely to claim benefits for mental health problems and there is growing concern about a generation who may do so for decades. The number of children on disability living allowance, the precursor to PIPs, will reach a million by the end of the decade, double pre-Covid levels. Most of these are for behavioural problems such as ADHD or learning disabilities  
    • I don't think anyone wants people who need support not to have it.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...