Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm delighted that the TCED has moved so quickly. I congratulate them on this. Working with the EFA and NHS Property will be a very demanding role and the mix of school leadership, project management skills and experience sounds a wise balance for this role.

As someone who has had several careers each benefiting from earlier ones I can see no problem in our new head having experience in the financial sector.


I trust TCS teams judgement in making this appointment. They clearly put together the best application for our new secondary school and I have no doubt they've chosen the best candidate for this new headship role.


I wonder whether the second coming would have made people happy with this appointment!

James - I think people have a right to have a say on a public forum about the new head- as it was the this community that signed petitions etc etc.


I certainly raised an eyebrow when I heard 5 years experience, think a lot would....doesn't mean he wont get support but everyone has a right to voice concerns.

Clearly as a Lib Dem I defend the right to free speach.

But the implied assumption The Charter School can't have made the right candidate choice isn't fair. They had all the facts and we don't.

When people google search TCSED in the future this will all pop up which will make the job harder convincing paretns to put our new secondary school as their first choice.

But James, the google search argument is a specious one - by that rationale, none of us should ever post anything discursive or questioning about our local schools, in case of future googlers?! Anyone considering the school as a first choice will want to hear all views, I'd have thought.
Not all people who work or worked in banks are inhumane... Quite a few are very nice, normal and community-spirited. Really... (No, I'm not a banker.) It's certainly not fair to generalise based on one bad experience. And I know a lot of Charter parents who are extremely happy with the new head. My children are not at secondary school yet so I can't speak from direct experience.

Jimthebuilder, you can't judge current head on current results. He has been in post for a year and a bit, current results will be based on leadership of the old head.


As for staff leaving, welcome to London - people get promoted, move to better jobs, relocate to the 'burbs. We should expect staff turnover. I have worked in education for many years and it rarely happens that people leave because they "can't work with the new guy"

Seems an odd decision to appoint Alex Crossman given he did not even hold QTS in 2012. He has never taught a normal timetable.


To suggest he was on the senior team at Charter in 2012 is not being totally truthful. He was placed onto it in 2012 as part of his training after moving from banking. He held no responsibilities and was not accountable as part of that team


So in fact he has 3 years experience in teaching full stop. All of which has been at the level of Vice Principal

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • Sent you a pm
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...