Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I would hate to be on my death bed and say, I should have moved to ED, eaten those sausage rolls, smoked 20 ciggs, drank a bottle of plonk and raved all night after dropping them there disco buscuits. But I never diEEEEAAAAARRRRRRHHHHHH!----------------.

Moos- am afraid I can back up my opinion on sausage rolls with the results of a large study published in a very eminent medical journal


" People who consume more than 3 pork based products a week (sausage roll, bacon sandwich, pork pie or pork scratchings) are 50% more likely to die before the age of 55 than those who do not indulge. HR 0.5 (95% CI 0.35-0.6)" Baby Jolly et al Lancet 2008.


It may be too late for you though ...

"Not good enough, sorry. Wild speculation, at best."


...oh really ? well very sorry but you can't hide behind statistics all your life. Open your eyes and walk around, if we got any of this lot at an open meeting they would be totally fucked. 9 years holding up the Nunhead Regeneration

, 10's of thousand's spent on leaflets and meeting's 100's of thousand spent on employing and removing people from related council posts - they only act when a core of middle class happy clappers get together and make them feel like they are dealing with people they "relate to".


you seem to place a lot of faith in council published statistics, i hate to inform you but.........they are wild speculation at best.


now run a long and fill in a derelict paddling pool that became a hotbed of anti-social activity.

jollybaby Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Moos- am afraid I can back up my opinion on

> sausage rolls with the results of a large study

> published in a very eminent medical journal

>

> " People who consume more than 3 pork based

> products a week (sausage roll, bacon sandwich,

> pork pie or pork scratchings) are 50% more likely

> to die before the age of 55 than those who do not

> indulge. HR 0.5 (95% CI 0.35-0.6)" Baby Jolly et

> al Lancet 2008.

>

> It may be too late for you though ...


How dare you, are you calling me old? I just look old because I live in Peckham, it's fashionable here.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...