Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I became a vegatarian because of sausages lol.


It's each to their own isn't it? We can though all share a common interest in how our food is produced, whatever we eat. And bees are crucial to our eco system. They pollinate aomething like 70% of all plants growing on the planet. And they are in decline. So anything that helps to keep bees going is a good thing imo.

My dad has to have vitamin B12 injections and calcium tablets because being a vegan doesn't provide the required nutrients. All of the long term vegans I know have deficiency-related health problems.


Vegans in less developed countries obtain additional nutrients from insects etc in their food, but our food is blasted with chemicals and insect free, so vegans in developed countries often have diets lacking in important nutrients.


I understand why someone is vegan from an ethical point of view, just don't pretend it's a healthy option.

LadyDeliah, most people long term end up deficient in something because we are so poorly educated about food, nutrition and are fed a diet of processed, manufactured rubbish. The whole food industry is guilty on that one.


All the vegans I know are pretty well educated in maintaining the right nutritional balance. B12 is found in soy milk and fortified soy products. It is possible to get enough B12 from that. And calcium is found in all kinds of things from leafy greens to fruit.


On the whole, vegetarians and vegans tend to be healthier long term than carnivores and live on average longer, and all the data supports that. But I like to think that any diet is healthy as long as the nutrient blance is right. It's not the diet that gets that wrong, but the person eating it.

My uncle (an original sixties hippy still living in what might be the last remaining commune still going in london from that period) was a committed vegan for many many years.

In the end he stopped because it 'sucked the joy out of life'.


He's still a veggie obviously, but i can see his point. I mean honey is actually a metaphor for the wondrous, perhaps divine, bountiful nature of this world.


It is all a *bit* hair shirt innit ;)

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My uncle (an original sixties hippy still living

> in what might be the last remaining commune still

> going in london from that period) was a committed

> vegan for many many years.

> In the end he stopped because it 'sucked the joy

> out of life'.

>


>

> It is all a *bit* hair shirt innit ;)


Or Hemp shirt, in this case i'd imagine

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LadyDeliah, most people long term end up deficient

> in something because we are so poorly educated

> about food, nutrition and are fed a diet of

> processed, manufactured rubbish. The whole food

> industry is guilty on that one.

>

> All the vegans I know are pretty well educated in

> maintaining the right nutritional balance. B12 is

> found in soy milk and fortified soy products. It

> is possible to get enough B12 from that. And

> calcium is found in all kinds of things from leafy

> greens to fruit.

>

> On the whole, vegetarians and vegans tend to be

> healthier long term than carnivores and live on

> average longer, and all the data supports that.

> But I like to think that any diet is healthy as

> long as the nutrient blance is right. It's not the

> diet that gets that wrong, but the person eating

> it.


I was vegan (with lapses into vegetarianism) for a fair few years. Some people are able to balance their diet like I was but I had to do it carefully. My OH on the other hand was not in good health whilst on a vegetarian diet. I think some people are constitutionally able to be vegan/veggie and some aren't.

"On the whole, vegetarians and vegans tend to be healthier long term than carnivores and live on average longer, and all the data supports that."


I'm not sure that's true.


"According to pure vegetarian ideologists, people consuming vegetarian diet have better health and live longer than nonvegetarians, because persons consuming milk, dairy products, meat, eggs and fish are at health risk. In fact the most healthy people in Europe are inhabitants of Iceland, Switzerland and Scandinavia, consuming great amounts of food of animal origin. Meta-analysis of several prospective studies showed no significant differences in the mortality caused by colorectal, stomach, lung, prostate or breast cancers and stroke between vegetarians and "health-conscious" nonvegetarians. In vegetarians, a decrease of ischemic heart disease mortality was observed probably due to lower total serum cholesterol levels, lower prevalence of obesity and higher consumption of antioxidants. Very probably, an ample consumption of fruits and vegetables and not the exclusion of meat make vegetarians healthful."


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19166134

I don't disagree with you Dave. There's data supporting all sides, and we have to take into account other things such as pollution, genes and lifestyle too. All of which are increasingly difficult to measure.


But we know too much sugar, fat, protein etc has impacts.


Actually the most interesting research has been that into fasting! Undereating changes the way the bodies cells operate, and the thinking now is that people who undereat (not starvation of course) increase their life expectancy. When we eat enough our cells replace themselves, replicating even the damaged cells. But when we undereat, our cells go into repair mode. It's thought that repair makes the body less susceptible to cancer for example.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They clearly don’t.  I would expect better from the council.  Rather dismally, it sounds like any complaints or requests just fall on deaf ears.
    • No, because they are a business and their job is to make a profit. It is the local council, on our behalf, who should be giving regard to the environment. Gala, not unreasonably, might take the view that it is the council's role to protect the environment of Southwark, and if they have no objection to this scheme then frankly why shouldn't they (Gala) go ahead? And the council also seems to take the view that they are focused on revenue and not the environment. Otherwise they might listen to the environmental pleas here. The mistake you are making is assuming that either party to this transaction (we are clearly only bystanders) gives a flying fig for the environment when there is money in the offing.
    • It struck me last year that any dialogue with Gala themselves e.g. at the box-ticking "Community Engagement Sessions" is completely pointless, as they are just a business trying to do whatever is necessary to hold their event; the park is just a venue to them, a necessary facility, and they'll say anything to secure it. They don't care about it's welfare or upkeep, over and above making sure there's no complaints big enough to prevent them using it again. I've found that discussing issues with them has just led to them using that info to counteract that issue - effectively helping them strengthen their position. What I find frustrating is that the council, despite being the body that decides on this, and should be representing local residents, takes no active part in any discussions or presentations, so there's no way to engage with them apart from an online consultation which is clearly also a box ticking exercise, bearing in mind for the last two years the overwhelming majority (97% of respondents) objected to the event. Why are Gala running the community meetings? Why do Gala run the issue hotline? If the council really care about the park and the surrounding community, and still allow this type of event, they should be way more hands on with taking responsibility for it's running, not just handing it all over to a profit making company.  Sorry, probably tldr but so sad about the repeated negative impact on our (once beautiful & peaceful) park and just exasperated that there's so little that can be done to halt it. This is just the start, it WILL turn into another Brockwell Park, and Gala & the council just don't care.
    • We used these guys for our underfloor heating, their heating engineer Sam was excellent. Very reassuring and sorted it all out properly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...