Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I became a vegatarian because of sausages lol.


It's each to their own isn't it? We can though all share a common interest in how our food is produced, whatever we eat. And bees are crucial to our eco system. They pollinate aomething like 70% of all plants growing on the planet. And they are in decline. So anything that helps to keep bees going is a good thing imo.

My dad has to have vitamin B12 injections and calcium tablets because being a vegan doesn't provide the required nutrients. All of the long term vegans I know have deficiency-related health problems.


Vegans in less developed countries obtain additional nutrients from insects etc in their food, but our food is blasted with chemicals and insect free, so vegans in developed countries often have diets lacking in important nutrients.


I understand why someone is vegan from an ethical point of view, just don't pretend it's a healthy option.

LadyDeliah, most people long term end up deficient in something because we are so poorly educated about food, nutrition and are fed a diet of processed, manufactured rubbish. The whole food industry is guilty on that one.


All the vegans I know are pretty well educated in maintaining the right nutritional balance. B12 is found in soy milk and fortified soy products. It is possible to get enough B12 from that. And calcium is found in all kinds of things from leafy greens to fruit.


On the whole, vegetarians and vegans tend to be healthier long term than carnivores and live on average longer, and all the data supports that. But I like to think that any diet is healthy as long as the nutrient blance is right. It's not the diet that gets that wrong, but the person eating it.

My uncle (an original sixties hippy still living in what might be the last remaining commune still going in london from that period) was a committed vegan for many many years.

In the end he stopped because it 'sucked the joy out of life'.


He's still a veggie obviously, but i can see his point. I mean honey is actually a metaphor for the wondrous, perhaps divine, bountiful nature of this world.


It is all a *bit* hair shirt innit ;)

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My uncle (an original sixties hippy still living

> in what might be the last remaining commune still

> going in london from that period) was a committed

> vegan for many many years.

> In the end he stopped because it 'sucked the joy

> out of life'.

>


>

> It is all a *bit* hair shirt innit ;)


Or Hemp shirt, in this case i'd imagine

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> LadyDeliah, most people long term end up deficient

> in something because we are so poorly educated

> about food, nutrition and are fed a diet of

> processed, manufactured rubbish. The whole food

> industry is guilty on that one.

>

> All the vegans I know are pretty well educated in

> maintaining the right nutritional balance. B12 is

> found in soy milk and fortified soy products. It

> is possible to get enough B12 from that. And

> calcium is found in all kinds of things from leafy

> greens to fruit.

>

> On the whole, vegetarians and vegans tend to be

> healthier long term than carnivores and live on

> average longer, and all the data supports that.

> But I like to think that any diet is healthy as

> long as the nutrient blance is right. It's not the

> diet that gets that wrong, but the person eating

> it.


I was vegan (with lapses into vegetarianism) for a fair few years. Some people are able to balance their diet like I was but I had to do it carefully. My OH on the other hand was not in good health whilst on a vegetarian diet. I think some people are constitutionally able to be vegan/veggie and some aren't.

"On the whole, vegetarians and vegans tend to be healthier long term than carnivores and live on average longer, and all the data supports that."


I'm not sure that's true.


"According to pure vegetarian ideologists, people consuming vegetarian diet have better health and live longer than nonvegetarians, because persons consuming milk, dairy products, meat, eggs and fish are at health risk. In fact the most healthy people in Europe are inhabitants of Iceland, Switzerland and Scandinavia, consuming great amounts of food of animal origin. Meta-analysis of several prospective studies showed no significant differences in the mortality caused by colorectal, stomach, lung, prostate or breast cancers and stroke between vegetarians and "health-conscious" nonvegetarians. In vegetarians, a decrease of ischemic heart disease mortality was observed probably due to lower total serum cholesterol levels, lower prevalence of obesity and higher consumption of antioxidants. Very probably, an ample consumption of fruits and vegetables and not the exclusion of meat make vegetarians healthful."


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19166134

I don't disagree with you Dave. There's data supporting all sides, and we have to take into account other things such as pollution, genes and lifestyle too. All of which are increasingly difficult to measure.


But we know too much sugar, fat, protein etc has impacts.


Actually the most interesting research has been that into fasting! Undereating changes the way the bodies cells operate, and the thinking now is that people who undereat (not starvation of course) increase their life expectancy. When we eat enough our cells replace themselves, replicating even the damaged cells. But when we undereat, our cells go into repair mode. It's thought that repair makes the body less susceptible to cancer for example.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Because they have been awful - scoring own-goal after own-goal. You cannot be an apologist for their diabolical first 100 days on the basis that the previous lot were worse - in the same way the whole of the 14 years of Tory rule was tarred with the brush of despair about their very worst behaviour in the latter years Labour run the risk of their government being tarred with the same brush on the basis of their first 100 days. It has probably been some of the worst 100 days of any new government and Starmer's approval ratings aren't as low as they are without reason. You know they are in trouble when MPs start posting the good bits from their first 100 days - it's a sure sign they know they have a problem. And when this government have a problem the frontbenchers disappear from media interviews and they roll-out the likes of Pat McFadden to provide some air cover. Yesterday it was farmers. Today it is the pensioners being pushed into poverty by Winter Fuel payments. It's a perceptual disaster and has been since day 1 - they have to get a grip on it else this leadership team is doomed. You highlight the very problem here. Farmers are not being gifted money. They are being gifted assets. Assets that they don't realise as they continue to work those assets to provide food for the country. Most inheritance is cash or an asset (a house) that people sell to generate cash. Passing a farm to younger family members is very different. On the news they interviewed a farmer whose family had owned the farm since 1822 and he broke down in tears when he spoke about his 13 year old son who was working in the farm to continue it - no doubt in the realisation that his son would be hit by a tax bill when he took it over. Given farmers are not cash rich then the decision would likely be that they would need to sell some of the land that generations had worked hard to build to fund the tax bill - and so many farms are on a knife's edge that it might be enough to send them over the edge.   There are many valid reasons why the government are doing what they are doing but those reasons are not cutting through and they are losing control of the narrative. That is a massive issue for them.  
    • Another great job by Simmonds Plastering. This time he decorated the newly plastered living room and added a pantry cupboard in kitchen.  He is reliable and works really hard.  Highly recommend 07949 180 533
    • Because land has been exempt from inheritance tax wealthy individuals (like Clarkson and Dyson) have used it as a tax avoidance measure. Clarkson is on the record stating that he bought land for precisely this purpose. It is people like him who farmers should be angry with, if anyone, because they have exploited a loophole, which is now being (partially) closed. Yes, I do grasp the concept of inheritance - it's were one is given money, or valuable assets by chance of birth (having done nothing to earn it). As money you have earned, is taxed, it seems odd that money you have not, shouldn't be. I assume you don't disapprove of income tax? Why do you think people coming into a massive, unearned windfall shouldn't pay tax, but a nurse who works hard for everything they earn, should? Everyone has to pay inheritance tax over a certain threshold. In my opinion, if you are fortunate enough to be gifted any amount of money (whether cash, or a valuable asset), to quibble about paying some tax on some of it, seems rather entitled. Most farms worth under £3m will still end up being passed on tax free. Those that do have to a pay inheritance tax will do so at just 20% on that part of it that is over the threshold (rather than the standard 40%), and they'll have 10 years to do so (usually it is payable immediately). So it is still preferential terms for those being gifted a multimillion pound estate. 
    • Ah yes, good spot! Thanks for the link. It sounds like they are planning a licensed restaurant with a small bar from reading through the application. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...