Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What are the symbols for East Dulwich, and what's the focal point? I can't think of any. There's no statue, no bandstand, no monolithic building... what could you put on the masthead for this forum that would be an instant identifier for the village?


My vote is for installing a classic, timeless bit of sculpture on the goose green roundabout. None of that socialist claptrap with stainless steel representations of the dancing proletariat of course.... and no big plastic cats.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/51-east-dulwich-icons/
Share on other sites

How about a huge bronze statue of James Nesbitt astride a rearing up horse on the Goose Green roundabout?


Or more radically a signpost that tells people which way is which. And, get this, it could say Denmark Hill & Central London, Peckham & East and Forest Hill & South. Perhaps in a tasteful Victorian style? Maybe even saying welcome to East Dulwich (not Camberwell as previously signposted by the council).


Good question Huguenot.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/51-east-dulwich-icons/#findComment-307
Share on other sites

Great idea - i drive past it everyday and think the roundabout looks very sad with its broken old lampost..

see link below to see how it did look. Quite handsome.

http://www.lordshiplane.co.uk/info/info6.asp


The james nesbit idea is pants, but am totally with you on the sign post thing in mock vic stylee..

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/51-east-dulwich-icons/#findComment-320
Share on other sites

How about Timothy Spall squabbling with a rearing Gloucestershire Old Spot? He's a local boy and I'm sure Peckham Rye was one massive pig farm?


Perhaps there are other more erudite local historical figures we could have earnestly reading books on a concrete pedestal with the ED name?


Failing that, if we go more mainstream I like the big vic signpost, but I reckon we need something that says 'you are here, and here is somewhere special' as well as guiding visitors elsewhere...


This bloke on a bicycle's quite cool Ed Elgar Phoebus side can't we pretend Elgar came from ED and nick this?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/51-east-dulwich-icons/#findComment-324
Share on other sites

did you know that Boris Karloff was born in ED? yup..there's a blue plaque outside his house on forest hill road next to the co-op. ok may just be ever so slightly on the border for ED - but I think we could claim him!! we could have a statue accentuating his prominent eyebrows!!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/51-east-dulwich-icons/#findComment-372
Share on other sites

How about William 'Bonkers' Blake. We could celebrate the now sadly discontinued tradition of 9 year old boys taking heroin on Peckham Rye with a swerving bronze opium poppy. Our lives are less colourful as a result. Bring back the Angels.


Or indeed William Joyce used to stamp his ground at ED before being hanged for the niggling oik that he was. We could commemorate his fleeting career as Lord Haw Haw with a substantial bakelite radio. This would no doubt send a riotously independent signal to the rest of the nation.


On the subject of quislings, independence and exile, Henry St John, 1st Viscount Bolingbroke, notorious peacemonger and frenchie-lover was sometime owner and resident of Friern Manor. It is on these hallowed lands that the majority of ED is built. As with Blake, he also took his turn cavorting naked on the park. As with Joyce he sowed some of his diseased garlick-munching discord from comfort overseas.


We could and should celebrate his republicanism and influence on both the American revolution and US constitution with an internally lit fibre-glass Dubya sporting hooped shirt, baguette & onions shouldering a US flag and waving a pilgrim's hat. Yes, turn in your graves you yankee monkees, without ED you would be nothing.


In fact I propose the creation of the Bolingbroke Blake Society as a vehicle for ED dissidence, heavy drinking and a focus for the establishment of the Republic of East Dulwich. We could embark on a series of goodwill capers designed to demonstrate the smiling face of the people's nation.


It could, of course, exist independently of the National Monument at Goose Green Roundabout

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/51-east-dulwich-icons/#findComment-376
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Erm, I'm not sure this is the right time/place to suggest it, but how about losing the roundabout entirely?


Anything you put on the roundabout will be "Look (through traffic), don't touch". If that chunk of public land that is now the roundabout were moved to make the surrounding pavements much wider, you could have a touchable statue, or a water feature you could dangle your hand in, or a damn great new "Iconic" entrance to Goose Green itself, right on the corner, or whatever.


A modern traffic light-controlled junction - i.e. no guardrail, no staggered 'sheep pen' crossings - coupled with a traffic light-controlled junction at the East Dulwich Grove junction with Lordship Lane, would be much safer for pedestrians. Just try crossing the roundabout by Grove Vale, and then imagine being a schoolkid from Goose Green School trying to cross there safely. And Transport for London would jump at the chance to pay for it, as they could then get buses through the junctions much quicker. They might agree to pay for lots of other street improvements at the same time - they've done just this elsewhere in London.


Look at the thread "Better Walking conditions on Lordship Lane" if you're interested in discussing this and other pro-walking ideas in more detail.


Paul Holdsworth


Living Streets

or how about an iron guantanamo style detention cage filled with the signs and slogans of the many inorganic chain establishments who would by no means be welcomed on the lane, with a flashing sign reading ''all chains end hear - you have been warned''


we could dress up a few tramps as FBI snipers and have them patrol the roundabout, just to jazz things up a bit!

Hi Paul


If losing the roundabout means more money to spend on improvements I'm all for it! I'm not sure how much money Southwark council wants to spend, so if you can also get money from TfL then go for it unless anyone really wants to keep the roundabout.


I'm all for participating in things like like, but unfortunately my past experiences involving anything to do with Southwark Council or any public bodies in Southwark has shown how utterly useless they all are and how politics are more important than what the people want. This may be a cynical view but dealing with eg the planning dept, the Southwark PCT, local councillors etc have been (with a few rare exceptions) a complete waste of time. I'm surprised the council is doing this, given that they can't even keep our streets clean (you have to go through your local councillor to get him to contact the relevant people with a bit of authority at the council - just to make sure your street gets cleaned more frequently than very couple of months!!) I'm just saying this in case you wonder why some people may be a little cynical and why some people may not even bother to put forward their ideas - which is a shame given you've taken the time to find this forum and put a posting on. Keep up the postings and I'll definitely keep on reading them and replying when you ask for ideas! Its obviously a good indicator that the council have engaged your organisation and hopefully something good will come out of it - so far you have shown a lot more willingness to obtain people's ideas than I have ever seen from the council!

Thanks for the kind words, Ko.


Southwark council have very little money to spend on this project - their budget would pay for a single new crossing on Lordship Lane and not much more. TfL have much deeper pockets, and if locals and Southwark Council are up for it, then attracting funding for Lordship Lane from TfL is probably the best way forward.


I'm not at all surprised by the cynicism you and others on this site express - I get this sort of reaction in most places! In fact, I spent two days walking up and down Lordship Lane talking to retailers, and was impressed by how POSITIVE they were about the council. (The things they mentioned were the new street trees, which "shows the Council cares", and efforts to increase personal safety on the street, with schemes to reduce shoplifting and a stronger presence of Community Wardens and PCSOs. The retailers were, like you, unhappy about streetcleaning, though.)


I can't promise this project will generate any change. Most of my reports, at best, influence thinking among key decisionmakers, and do little more. But sometimes they do help to create real change. The nearest example to East Dulwich (at least until Sydenham gets transformed - if it happens) is in Balham. There, a Living Streets Community Street Audit helped start a process that resulted in a superb new double-diagonal crossing in the town centre (with no guardrails!), along with beautiful new footways, smart new seats and other street furniture, level stepless crossings on side roads, and much more. And it was mainly funded by TfL.


As someone who was born in SE London, who lived in Forest Hill and shopped on Lordship Lane for over ten years, I'd dearly love to be a small part of a really big improvement to a local shopping street that absolutely deserves some tender loving care.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Walking last Friday early evening anywhere near where the bottom end of Lordship Lane meets the Goose Green roundabout, one would have been directly confronted - as I was - with this scene: Outside the East Dulwich Tavern an impenetrable phalanx of pushing yobs, shouty louts and selfish yahoos pressed outward from the open doors of this establishment, past the curtilage (the land in front of and owned by the business), all across the public right of way, to the kerbside. This was the situation all the way along, end to end. I watched as passersby, old people, children, parents with buggies, people just going about their business, were forced by these booze-sucking bellowing scumbags onto the road - where, at that hour, traffic rushed endlessly off the roundabout. We have, I realised, somehow become so used to this revolting spectacles as to believe it to be inevitable. It is not. This is why I'm dropping this post. Enough really is enough. This roiling boozy blockade represents a total failure by all the responsible authorities - the licencing authority, for example - but most of all (yet once more, again, as ever), by Southwark Council. Two very different comparisons to give you some perspective: 1. The Kings Head pub on the corner of Albermarle and Stafford Streets, London SW1. Here too, patrons like to drink and chat outside on a warm evening - why should they not. But here, on the latter side a line marks the curtilage on the pavement. Drinkers remain, respectfully, in good order, within the line, watched, quietly and carefully, by a security guard. I wager good money this arrangement is a condition of this pub's licence. 2. The Blue Brick is a cafe in the quiet backstreets of East Dulwich, on the corners of Fellbrigg and Shawbury Roads. Until a few months ago, about half its covers were tables out on the pavement. They bothered nobody. Oh! But they extended all of several centimetres too far into the footpath, so into fearless action swang Southwark Council officers - and now these tables are gone. Result, eh? "Well you see," some wiseacre said to me, "There needs to be a complaint." Not actually true, but for sure this is all too often how local authorities get pushed to do what they should be doing. Hard to think why a complaint trumps, say (and god forbid!) a child being injured on the road. In which circumstance, of course!, Southwark would swing into noisy, virtue-signalling, belated action. But in any case let this post be considered a big, very definite COMPLAINT about this prolonged abuse of our public right of way. I invite readers who agree with me to add their voices. Oh, and all those wee local ward councillors might get off their chufties, defy their party managers, and actually help sort this scandal out. Thanks for reading, Lee Scoresby
    • Hi there, I saw that Google lists the park opening time as 7:30am, but I was wondering if it might actually open earlier than that - maybe anyone who’s out running early or passing by has noticed?  
    • We are thrilled to announce that Little Stars Creche in Dulwich will be opening its doors on 28th April and we would love to invite you and your little ones to an open day where you can meet our team and visit our wonderful setting.  Little Stars is a fun creative space for children aged 2 to 4 years to enjoy whilst parents and carers get some well needed time to catch up on life! We are so excited to bring this much-needed service to the community, and we want to thank all the wonderful parents and carers for participating in our recent survey. Your feedback was invaluable in shaping Little Stars and ensuring it meets the needs of local families. For full information about Little Stars and a detailed schedule please visit our webpage here: Little Stars Crèche We can’t wait to meet you and your little stars soon!
    • Avoid any 2nd hand vehicle with the Ford petrol 1.0 Ecoboost engine and the Petrol 1.2 PureTech engine that can be found in Peugeot, Citroen, Vauxhall.... (you need to mention price for advice)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...