Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

According to the latest Dulwich estate newsletter:


HALF MOON will be redeveloped as a pub/hotel

CROWN & GREYHOUND refurbishment has been delayed but opening as pub/hotel in 2016

GROVE TAVERN - little prospect of it reopening as a pub, the estate would like to redevelop it as a mix of commercial and residential units.


http://www.dulwichestate.co.uk/docs/general/dulwich-estate-bulletin-issue3.pdf

Well it's actually very disruptive, not just to locals such as myself, but also to the businesses locally who struggle with the high rents. The Dog is a major attraction and neighbouring (this spell check is American you know)shops benefit hugely from it being open and suffer when it is closed for long periods such as this. Is it any coincidence that Shepards have had to sell out to Sainsbury's?


It is of course very easy to criticise the Dulwich Estate but they really should get their act together on this and the Half Moon, and the Grove. It is having an adverse effect at all of these locations, although I think most of all in the Village, and you do wonder what the Charity Commissioners are thinking allowing this sort of thing to continue.

The Dulwich Estate's only objective is to increase it's annual income for the benefit of a handful of elite private schools. It's a charity in the strict legal sense, but not as it's commonly understood - i.e. giving freely to those in need.
That's the whole point. They are not doing their job, which is to maximise their revenues, by letting the pub stay empty for a couple of years, longer with the Grove. What is the real cost to the Estate of this seemingly disjointed approach to the management of their assets?
Or, perhaps, they are doing their job. A pub with vacant possession may appreciate in value far more than any rental income it could generate. This would allow DE to sell off unencumbered properties to developers when their market value is highest. Not pretty, not socially-minded but welcome to free market economics.

Mugglesworth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Or, perhaps, they are doing their job. A pub with

> vacant possession may appreciate in value far more

> than any rental income it could generate. This

> would allow DE to sell off unencumbered properties

> to developers when their market value is highest.

> Not pretty, not socially-minded but welcome to

> free market economics.


I'm doing the same with an inherited house (not my choice).

So are the Chinese with half of central London.


But an empty house is horrible really - same as an empty pub.

I doubt very much if The Grove Tavern could ever sustain itself as a Pub or Pub/Restaurant in todays climate.

Its simply in the wrong place. Was ok back in the day when drink driving was a lot more relaxed.

Which explains why there is car parking for 80+ ? cars.


The Crown & Greyhound (Once two pubs) Could possible survive as a Pub..

I'm not too sure who would stay there if it became a hotel. Too far from central London ??

..and a bit isolated with poor transport links.


The Half Moon was always a popular Pub and good Music Venue. (Steve Waller. God bless him)

It has better transport links with a Train Station.

Not sure about it being a Hotel.. Perhaps in Victorian times with the coming of the Steam Railway.



DulwichFox

"The Crown & Greyhound (Once two pubs) Could possible survive as a Pub..

I'm not too sure who would stay there if it became a hotel. Too far from central London ??

..and a bit isolated with poor transport links."


It will be popular with those visiting from outside London, come to see their grown up children and grand-children. I think it's a lovely spot for a hotel, North Dulwich station just up the road.

Mugglesworth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Or, perhaps, they are doing their job. A pub with

> vacant possession may appreciate in value far more

> than any rental income it could generate. This

> would allow DE to sell off unencumbered properties

> to developers when their market value is highest.

> Not pretty, not socially-minded but welcome to

> free market economics.


Exactly this. It does stick in the craw that they have charitable status and enjoy tax breaks though. The criteria for awarding charitable status really ought to be overhauled.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And the Sainsbury’s own brand chocolate mini rolls have gone from £1.15 to £1.40 overnight, so 22%-ish. I prefer them them to the Cadbury original because they have a lot more chocolate on them, presumably because they’re made in a less advanced factory. I would think that getting the Rizla thin coating of chocolate that Cadbury’s accountants demand onto a piece of sponge is quite a sophisticated operation. Discuss.
    • Another recommendation for Leon. He was able to come out to our electrical elergency within 24 hours of me contacting him. His communication was great and whilst he could not solve our problem, he was able to perform tests to identify this and did so quickly and efficiently. He charging  is very fair and his manner very pleasant. Both of these in contrast to some experiences I have had elsewhere.    happy to put my name to recommending Leon. His number is  07707 925039.
    • Other than acting as 'interested parties' Southwark Councillors have no responsibility for water issues. And no real leverage either. Considering the complete disdain with which Thames Water treats its own Regulator, and the government, (let alone its customers) I doubt very much whether an entire battalion of councillors would have much impact. What powers could they exercise?
    • That may not be so - many on this site are experts in many areas - you yourself claim huge traffic management (or similar) expertise for instance. And I think you will find that Southwark employees are unlikely to support criticism or challenges to Southwark policy - why, you don't and you apparently neither live in, or vote in, the borough. Do you, however, work for it, as you are such a cheerleader? If not, then you are the most passionate disinterested person on this site, as regards so many aspects, not just traffic.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...