Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Even 25 years ago the Grove was a good family pub - great from May through to late September in the garden with children, a barbeque in the summer. Because the garden was so large children weren't oppressive to the un-childed. Even the very early Harvester days weren't that bad, then it just seemed to lose direction, and, eventually, customers. With (originally) 2 good car parks it could have been quite an attractor for groups. That site, and that footprint, ought to give great opportunity to revive a pub there. It's a scandal it sits there boarded up and decaying. It's not as if there was too much commercial land about locally that that shoudn't need to be used.


But maybe the fact that virtually the 3 biggest (by footprint) boozers locally are all shut says something about changing mores and customs.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dulwich Estate is Arsene Wenger and

> the Grove is Nicklas Bendtner - what can they do?

>


Superb.


Thanks everyone for the feedback on the piece and, more importantly, your thoughts and wisdom on the subject.


Trying not to think too much about pubs today due to deep hangover, but hopefully nothing a fry-up at Johnnies won't fix.



TDR

spider69 Wrote:


>

> Let it reopen as a normal local pub much as I

> remember it in th 1970's where you went for a pint

> and the children played in the garden. Unlike

> today where kids have to run around in the bar.

>

> It was a local not the "lets be seen expensive

> bars" that seem to be the norm in ED pricing thr

> local plebs out

>

> Showing my age


It was actually about the poshest pub in the area, apart from perhaps, believe or not, the Fox on the Hill. Both had very good, for the standard of the time, restaurants and, along with the Steak House in Dulwich Village were where people went if they wanted a meal out. I am pretty certain the the one in the Grove was called the Peacock Room or bar & Restaurant, can't remember. But I also think that gentleman had to wear a jacket and tie to be allowed into the restaurant. I only ate there once with a friends family when I was about 13 or 14 (1971/2) and it was very smart.

I have heard a rumour that there is a push to change the planning for the Grove from a licensed venue/hotel to a school. Given the fact SE22/21 are drastically short of primary school places, would this not be a better use for this site, given that Lordship Lane and Forest Hill have quite a number of pubs...

To Steveo 'They may not have had much to do with the three pubs being shut but I think it's beholden on us to at least let the Governors know that someone cares while they make up their minds whether they are conservators or a rapacious property company'


To me the answer is obvious - rapacious property company. Furthermore I think there is a masterplan behind it - to turn Dulwich into a place where the chains will pay over the odds rents for a presence. The evidence of their recent non renewal of leaseholders in Dulwich Village points to this. The Flower Shop have been given their marching orders after 2 generations, and that includes, I'm told, them getting evicted out of the upstairs flat.


The Estate always falls back on 'an obligation to maximise returns' argument - the reality is that there is a lot of leeway, as institutional landlords, as to how they behave. Rumour I'ver heard, whether true or not, is they are trying to bang through an underground car park on the SG Smith development site, so the planning is sitting nicely for them to open a small Waitrose where the SG Smith showroom is now. Rapacious property developers I can handle, the one that proper turns my stomach is their holier than thou hypocrisy around conservation.

  • 2 months later...

ladyruskin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can't you apply for the grove tavern to be

> transferred into a community asset in a similar

> fashion to the Ivy House?


Community asset? over ?5 a pint when I called in during the summer Maybe I was'nt their type.

Mugglesworth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What were you drinking grace3? Beer starts at

> under ?3 a pint (Trumans) in the Ivy House.


Yeah, but as you know there are people who happily ignore differences in beer in terms of strength, quality and so on. Like people who see a ?12 bottle of wine and say, "?12?! I can get a bottle of wine for ?4!" The success of the Ivy House tells you all you need to know about how successful a community pub it is, but there are always moaners who'd preferred that it reamined shut.

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > Community asset? over ?5 a pint when I called

> in

> > during the summer Maybe I was'nt their type.

>

>

> It's been shut for over a year so no you didn't



maybe you didn't fit in either?

twister Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> we would be happy to put into a community pub. Say

> that the Magdala/Mag/Patch...... Would be a better

> option for a community pub.



Don't understand, it's probably my fault, but could you explain what you mean?

  • 7 months later...

Shanikus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have heard a rumour that there is a push to

> change the planning for the Grove from a licensed

> venue/hotel to a school. Given the fact SE22/21

> are drastically short of primary school places,

> would this not be a better use for this site,

> given that Lordship Lane and Forest Hill havej

> quite a number of pubs...


Hello I realise that I am coming v late to this thread : this week I heard (a rumour) that Lidl are moving into the Grove Tavern . Is this true? anyone know?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And the Sainsbury’s own brand chocolate mini rolls have gone from £1.15 to £1.40 overnight, so 22%-ish. I prefer them them to the Cadbury original because they have a lot more chocolate on them, presumably because they’re made in a less advanced factory. I would think that getting the Rizla thin coating of chocolate that Cadbury’s accountants demand onto a piece of sponge is quite a sophisticated operation. Discuss.
    • Another recommendation for Leon. He was able to come out to our electrical elergency within 24 hours of me contacting him. His communication was great and whilst he could not solve our problem, he was able to perform tests to identify this and did so quickly and efficiently. He charging  is very fair and his manner very pleasant. Both of these in contrast to some experiences I have had elsewhere.    happy to put my name to recommending Leon. His number is  07707 925039.
    • Other than acting as 'interested parties' Southwark Councillors have no responsibility for water issues. And no real leverage either. Considering the complete disdain with which Thames Water treats its own Regulator, and the government, (let alone its customers) I doubt very much whether an entire battalion of councillors would have much impact. What powers could they exercise?
    • That may not be so - many on this site are experts in many areas - you yourself claim huge traffic management (or similar) expertise for instance. And I think you will find that Southwark employees are unlikely to support criticism or challenges to Southwark policy - why, you don't and you apparently neither live in, or vote in, the borough. Do you, however, work for it, as you are such a cheerleader? If not, then you are the most passionate disinterested person on this site, as regards so many aspects, not just traffic.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...