Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeez, you are boring. For about two posts there I

> thought your login had been hijacked but it turns

> out you are back to your old self.



Not as boring as you getting all high and mighty when the forces of darkness are linked with diving, especially as the players I've mentioned were or are the best exponents on the planet. If you can't take the heat, piss off out the kitchen. >:D< Oh by the way I've discovered emocions.

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://wwwdelivery.superstock.com/WI/223/1560/Prev

> iewComp/SuperStock_1560R-2019812.jpg



Marks for Gerrards dive at Anfield last season in CMPL when the opposition defender had the temerity to look at him in a nasty way. They broke the mould when they made the likes of Frank McClintock, Tony Adams, Steve Bould and Keown (he's got a monkeys head)

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What charming language Atila. Matt, that list is

> hilarious, no Torres or Van Persie? And surely

> Pires counts for two he was so bad. ::o



No, I think horse face Van Nistleroy counts as 10 as he was the biggest cheating c**nt that ever played in the prem, Van Persie, yeah right. Should have gone to spec savers.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Charmed again AG.

>

> What about Andy Johnson? Bergkamp struggled to

> stay on his feet as did Overmars.



Does talking bollocks come naturally to you or do you take lessons? As the overwhelming evidence on this forum proves, the majority of opinion points the finger at your players past and present being exponents of the double twist back flip with pike. Bergkamp and overmars struggled to stay on their feet becaiue they were constantly being hacked over by "good honest, professionl" journeymen who couldn't play football properly if their wretched lives depended on it. I love the comments most pundits come out with when Scholes (regularly) scythes someone down, "He can't tackle can he", well don't fcuking try then you ginger knob, if you're going to potentially injure someone!!!

Yes Pires was a diving cheat but you cannot put him in the same bracket as Ronaldo... but of course the undoubted master of diving in the box was Ruud Van Nistlerooy. No one, not even Ronaldo can touch the Dutchman. Ahh I forgot Teddy Sheringham.. now there was a player who had no shame in the box although most of his dirtiest work at Spurs.


We all know there are individuals who cheat and it's difficult to pin the blame on the Club they play for but when you have half a team of players who dive outside the box (rather than make a pass) because they have a master craftsman free kick taker then that is an entirely new level of cheating. I don't want to point any fingers here but not so many years ago the Club in question would have it's players manufacture 50-50 challenges on edge of opposition box so they could vault 2 footed in the air to try and win a free kick - they usually got the free kicks but this tactic suddenly disappeared circa 2003.

Oh, this is a suprise. I really thought I was going to get a well balanced opinion from you Matt.....not. What a shame you've stuck your blinkers on again so soon after the beginning of the season. I guess it's all downhill from here. :( Of course the only way we ever win games is by diving AND we send our scouts out looking for the best divers in the world. you two just crack me up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Time will tell if H&B are loved or loathed, the footfall they get and generate will determine if they stay or go. That's the nature of businesses, they come and go dependant on usage. Examples are M&S, Poundland Local, Co-op, Superdrug, Mons, the chain restaurant/takeaways, the chain Estate Agents, Toolstation, Screwfix to name a few.  As much as people would like to see Lordship Lane remain a high street of independents, it is becoming clear that due to Landlords hiking rents, some are unable to survive. This leaves empty units which some of the chain brands considering it to be worth a "punt". I'd have thought that businesses operating in shops is a better alternative than a high street with multiple empty units, but what do I know, they are just thoughts on the subject.   Take a look at Croydon and Bromley where what were once thriving high streets are in decline.  I have to say that some of the prices charged by the independents are eye watering, and incomes i'd have thought have to be substantial to afford their prices. Personally I'd love a Lidl to open on what was the site of the Harvester, but I guess that would get shouted down, oh the thought of Lidl in Dulwich. Whatever next. 
    • IMO, Sealy, the best nights sleep you'll ever have.  
    • I don’t know what the shop was originally next to the big St Christopher’s but if Holland and Barrett are taking it over then surely it’s good to have a choice on Lordship Lane? The Camberwell H&B is always empty but the Brixton branch busy.  I remember when the Marks & Spencer food shop was Iceland? Now the M&S is a very busy store and at the time regenerated the high street!
    • Nor would I have done, but it came up when I googled John Lewis reviews. Do you not trust TrustPilot reviews? Even allowing for the fact that many people only post reviews when they have had poor service, 27% one star reviews is indicative of something wrong, I would say. That's 27% of 76,392 reviews. That's an awful lot of people who don't  think the service they got from John Lewis was even worth two stars, let alone more. Screenshot attached.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...