Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've been away for a few days in sunny Southampton and this is my first chance to post pre the old stratford farce.


Surprise surprise, Man ure get a penalty, and even greater surprise we don't!!! No argument with the Rooney penalty, but Fletcher was a dirty little fcuker throughout, and, surprise surprise, went unpunished. Now if we are to use video evidence to punish players retrospectively, as was the case with Eduardo, then Fletcher should be banned retrospectively on the basis of clattering the little Russian. Never mind, at least Man Ure didn't score from open play, and I beleive that the Champions this season, on the basis of what I've seen thus far, will be the noveau riche CSKA Fulham.

Wenger has made some interesting observations about United's central midfield, he has alluded to their purpose as being to destroy rather than create. I'm not sure whether it is sour grapes on Wenger's part but I have to say Fletcher has never struck me as a midfielder enforcer. I'd say his greatest attribute is a good engine but other than that he is limited. I think Wenger should be pointing the finger more at his own players - this was a game where they dominated United more than when Liverpool won at Old Trafford 4-1 and yet barely tested Ben Foster. Arsenal should have been shooting on sight as I believe Foster is United's major weak link. In many ways Foster reminds me Scott Carson who struggled with the fundamentals but seemed to have made a career solely from point blank saves.
When SAF plays one up front at home against anyone it's an admission of not really believing in his players being able to dominate a game. United chose to stifle the Arse and frankly were lucky to win. Maybe his tactics were spot on as they won but I hope it's not a sign of things to come. I prefer the you score X and we'll score X+1 approach to football.

Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've been away for a few days in sunny Southampton

> and this is my first chance to post pre the old

> stratford farce.

>

> Surprise surprise, Man ure get a penalty, and even

> greater surprise we don't!!!


Atila - Is one dodgy penalty per week not enough for you - don't get greedy now.

On the Sunday Supplement yesterday, Matt Lawton from the Daily Mail claimed to have now seen a previously unseen camera angle that shows the keeper knocking Eduardo's ankle... whether there is much credibility in this claim I don't know as also on same show it was claimed Wayne Rooney is best player in Premiership.

Ok, so Fletcher got away with a dodgy tackle and if they review the evidence and he gets a ban then he should hold his hands up. Fletcher is a great international player and we miss him when he sn't playing, in my opinion.


Why did saturdays performance not make us look good enough? It was pretty well balanced in terms of play for most of the game. We played openly and expansively and made several good chances and certainly looked better than we have for a couple of games. We obvioulsy had Arsenal on the back foot otherwise you wouldn't have had an own goal like that. It seems to me that we did what we needed to do and as far as Arsenal playing as well as Liverpool in the 1-4 Matt, you do your team down. Arsenal weren't that good.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On the Sunday Supplement yesterday, Matt Lawton

> from the Daily Mail claimed to have now seen a

> previously unseen camera angle that shows the

> keeper knocking Eduardo's ankle... whether there

> is much credibility in this claim I don't know as

> also on same show it was claimed Wayne Rooney is

> best player in Premiership.



Any journalist who thinks a little bit of contact, on a player who has 1) already decided to fall down and is 2) already falling down before contact takes place, gets that player off with cheating/diving accusations is missing the point.

Wenger seems to have been suggesting that part of United's game plan was to kick Arsenal players (with getting the ball being a bonus) in safe areas of the pitch to break up flow of play - a similar claim was also made back in circa 2004 when Gary Neville systematically fouled Jose Antonio Reyes at Old Trafford.


Yes diving is different - and again this fixture probably threw up the most infamous dive in Premiership history back in the autumn of 2004. These players should be punished retrospectively if necessary but persistant fouling has to be dealt with by the Referee.

...that of course is only your opinion Matthew rather than the general concensus your posts suggests, I think if you asked the question generally you'd get many nominations, mine would be Pires's against (I think) Pompey, the blatancy of it was truely shocking at the time...
Wenger is just being ridiculous. There was hardly a hard tackle in the game. for the first 20 mins it was end to end. How were we breaking play up in a negative fashion? I've just logged a film of the 1973 FA Cup quarter final replay between Arsenal and Chelsea. It shows an example of a blatantly diving Arsenal player winning a penalty.....nothing changes (and I don't mean it's just arsenal before a certain person comes on going on about ladyboys - a fixation he should really watch - and mugs :))). When the film is digitised on our website I'll post a link.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes diving is different - and again this fixture

> probably threw up the most infamous dive in

> Premiership history back in the autumn of 2004.

> These players should be punished retrospectively

> if necessary but persistant fouling has to be

> dealt with by the Referee.



Couldn't agree more this was when the fat twat Shrek look a like Rooney went down like a sack of shite when Sol Campbell looked at him the wrong way, gaining a pen and putting and end to our unbeaten run. Easily the biggest and most notorious dive in the history of the Prem. Can we ban him retrospectively???????

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wenger is just being ridiculous. There was hardly

> a hard tackle in the game. for the first 20 mins

> it was end to end. How were we breaking play up in

> a negative fashion? I've just logged a film of the

> 1973 FA Cup quarter final replay between Arsenal

> and Chelsea. It shows an example of a blatantly

> diving Arsenal player winning a

> penalty.....nothing changes (and I don't mean it's

> just arsenal before a certain person comes on

> going on about ladyboys - a fixation he should

> really watch - and mugs :))). When the film is

> digitised on our website I'll post a link.


I've no fixation with them, as they all seem to play for your team, and I think you'll find Red Devil is the person who has the fixation not I. Yet gain you missed the point, Arshavin was clearly clattered but didn't get the pen, WHAT A SHOCK!!! AS for divers, those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones, or have already forgotten the antics of Horse Face Van Nistleroy, Forlan, and the fake Ronaldo, not to mention Shrek???

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Latest Arsenal team photo...

>

> http://img.metro.co.uk/i/pix/2007/02/venusflytrap_

> 450x250.jpg



I thought this was Ronaldo and Ferdinand with friends on a fashion shoot

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is that the five-a-side team.


Shrewd move by Wenger don't you think Jah?, gets around the problem of players getting distracted by WAGS, I wondered why Wenger looks so pleased with himself recently...

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ha, ha. I love that in Atlia world Arsenal players

> don't dive. I think he IS Arsene Wenger.



You really are a bigger plum than I thought, if you check my posting I've not once said our players have never dived, but take a long hard look at your team before you start throwing the dirt around. As I said your record is fair from clean in that regard.

Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> matthew123 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Yes diving is different - and again this

> fixture

> > probably threw up the most infamous dive in

> > Premiership history back in the autumn of 2004.

> > These players should be punished

> retrospectively

> > if necessary but persistant fouling has to be

> > dealt with by the Referee.

>

>

> Couldn't agree more this was when the fat @#$%&

> Shrek look a like Rooney went down like a sack of

> shite when Sol Campbell looked at him the wrong

> way, gaining a pen and putting and end to our

> unbeaten run. Easily the biggest and most

> notorious dive in the history of the Prem. Can we

> ban him retrospectively???????


 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...