Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hahahahahahahahahahahahhahahhahhhahahhahahahhahahahhahahhahaha


Celtic top again - Gers could not take the pressure of being top for 4 days - game on it will go down to the last day guaranteed - its always more exciting in Scotland.....Game on...either team could win it now.

On this Stoke ugly football argument I fall firmly in the pro-Stoke category. For all the arguments already espoused by Keef et al.


And as for not being entertaining? Trust me, when you don't support one of the big 4 nothing is more entertaining than watching them struggle against such lowly opposition. All those millions spent and some long grass and a throw in cause havoc. Brilliant.

Remember the Crazy Gang? They were a novelty to start with but eventually half the League copied their tactics to compete and the top flight became more and more about physical power and the long ball over the next 10 years. Dire football compared with the 80s - all of a sudden you had boring, boring Arsenal and the chest stamping Manchester United on top. The England team was a complete failure as the most effective players, as a direct result of the shift in football style brought on by Wimbledon, became the likes of Dennis Wise, Carlton Palmer and Fash the Bash.


If Stoke are successful other teams will follow that model - and we'll soon be returning to the dark ages.


How do you stop likes of Stoke - e.g. ban the towel & direct throw into box, or does every team follow same tactic.. where winning a throw in near corner flag is more important than pass and move on edge of box?

English football suffered in the mid-80's to mid 90's, not because of the likes of Wimbledon, but because of the 5 year European ban imposed as a result of Heysel. It took us another 5 years to eventually catch up with the Europeans...it's laughable that people think the face and style of football will change because of a novelty long throw-in...

Quite.


And you can't have it both ways - either they're shit but their style of football enables Premiership survival (just) or suddenly a punt & run game seems the new method to win the league and Man U sell Ronaldo and get Duncan Ferguson out of retirement.


When the big boys allow for more money to be filtered down to lower placed clubs and lower divisions they can start moaning. Until then they can sit on their piles of cash and shut the fuck up.

Wasn't Gary Neville once known for his long throw in? And some guy at Tranmere a few years back, it's not a new thing, and it works. I'd bloody well use it. Frankly, wishing relegation on a team is pure sour grapes because they made you look a bit silly when your team couldn't beat them (not to anyone in particular).


The only teams I wish relegation on, are teams managed by Big Sam or Neil Warnock.

The long throw isn't the issue. It's the time wasting that goes with it. You're right, if the refs aren't going to do anything about then we're screwed. Doesn't mean we have to like it.


Oh and re' supporting the big four. Some of us were born in those circumstances and it wasn't a choice. Hope that's okay.

Anna - no you don't have to like it; but constantly harping on about it, coupled with wishing relegation on a team just because they figured out a tactic to beat some of the big boys without spending billions is, as your fellow red Keef says, sour grapes.


And if you're ok with being brainwashed from a young age then I am ;-)

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wasn't Gary Neville once known for his long throw

> in? And some guy at Tranmere a few years back,

> it's not a new thing, and it works. I'd bloody

> well use it. Frankly, wishing relegation on a team

> is pure sour grapes because they made you look a

> bit silly when your team couldn't beat them (not

> to anyone in particular).

>

> The only teams I wish relegation on, are teams

> managed by Big Sam or Neil Warnock.




You missed out that slimy twat Steve bruce

Some of us were born in those circumstances and it wasn't a choice.


Ha ha, that does actually sound a bit scary.


your fellow red Keef


I don't think I count as "a red" anymore to be honest. I'd never realised you had to do so much to earn your stripes and work your way up the ranks. Frankly I can't be arsed with any of it. The banter, the blind loyalty, the superiority, it's all just a complete load of shite based around a meaningless game.


I know SP left this thread for a while, and if I'm honest, I thought he was being over sensetive to things. However, this thread just makes me angry, and life is far too short to get angry about a pathetic game. It's fun to watch, but it means absolutely bloody nothing!!!

My my we are all getting a bit carried away here. The bit by david_carnell about the big 4 spending billions is not quite correct, Le Boss has stubbornly refused to spend any money at all on established players, Arshavin being the exception to the rule. I like to watch football being played well, not kick and rush or shaven headed thugs trying to kick the living shit out of the opposition because they are not as gifted as their opponents, and Stoke aren't the first to resort to such tactics and I'm sure they won't be the last. That doesn't mean I have to like it and it's not sour grapes, it's not pleasing on the eye, they are about as easy on the eye as a needle through the retina.

I say again good people, I hope Stoke are relegated for the sake of the beautiful game, which is an alien concept to such sides. I can't believe Tony Pullis is being touted as manager of the season, has everyone totally missed the brilliant efforts of Woy Hodgson. The man has done miracles at Fulham, and they play the right way. And they don't spend billions.

Alright billions was a tad hyperbolic. Hundreds of millions is not however. The point remains.


As does yours about Hodgson. Genius. Don't forget where Fulham finished last year and that was only because he rescued them from relegation. Along with Zola, he's done a damn fine job.

>> I'd never realised you had to do so much to earn your stripes and work your way up the ranks.


What!? Who!? Why!? As far as I'm concerned all Liverpool fans are equal.. although I do like to have the final word ;-)


Football is a sport and without sport the world would be a much poorer place. I personally don't understand the beauty in towelling the ball dry for a long throw in - and the fact Gary Neville used to do it should tell you everything you need to know about that particular technique.


Anyone who claims Stoke are upholding the ancient traditions of British Football may as well say that the graffiti artist Banksy is a modern day Grand Master.

Banksy is!


As I've said before these teams can play however they like. I personally always liked the way that Blackburn got accused of playing rough with Arsenal, it showed they'd got to them and made the Gooners look weak. Let's face it Liverpool resorted to the long ball hoof when they got desperate for a goal this season and it worked. You do what you have to do and more power to you!


Edit to say, don't go anywhere Keef! It's cold out there....and the place wouldn't be the same without your conflicted views! ;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...