Jump to content

Recommended Posts

David Bentley definitely has the talent but he just doesn't work hard enough. He's all flash and not enough graft. To be a great player you must have both and at the moment he doesn't have either. Still living off that 40 yarder against the Arsenal in that 4-4 earlier in the season.

He only likes playing on the right. Against Stoke in midweek he played quite well but when him and Aaron Lennon switched wings in the second half guess who disappeared?

By contrast Lennon has been brilliant for us this despite the team having a poor season. He is lightening quick, great skill, works very hard, always wants the ball, scores goals and his final ball is finally coming together. Should be back in the England reckoning very soon.

Would be gutted to see Norwich relegated as they are my second team. Thought that Gunn had sorted things out with his first win. Hopefully things will turn around before May.


Went to the home game v QPR last season. Was an entertaining game, but more of a circus than a footy match. QPR's keeper was a shambles.

Norwich was actually the first team I saw from the Kop - what a day, what a feeling, walking up the steep steps and than gazing down on that wide open terrace. Norwich were a good team back then and got a 0-0 result in a season when Liverpool demolished most teams at Anfield 4-0. Does anyone know what season I am talking about?

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mind you, losing to Southampton!!! Times must be

> bad!!!

> Still, should cheer Fear'n'boozing up a bit at

> least.


Oi... thats my team your talking about! I will have you know that according to a number of journos Saints have one of the most exciting young teams in the league. Its just a pity we cannot score sometimes.... or play very well..... or stop other teams scoring....


Anyway we have a new manager and looking forward to beating Swansea tomorrow and going down to watch the game on Tuesday.

Swansea on a roll, from what I can gather they're back in the zone ... so big prediction ... they'll score 4 or 5 tomorrow on the South Coast..


Pass the bucket... Honest 'Arry explaining how he ain't been tapping up Robbie Keane - http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/7862151.stm

zephyr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ratty

>

> now saggy chops has left pompey, what do you

> honestly think of him?



What I have thought of him since he went to S**thampton. That he is a self publicising gobsh1te that has the media ( and a few brown envelopes) in his pocket. Teflon harry he should be called. :)


Rather be in the Championship with Tony Adams than anywhere with Redknapp!

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not very sporting that Ratty. :-S



If a player came to Liverpool, did well for us, but then fucked off within a year, and asked us for a loyalty payment, I think my reaction would be exactly the same as ratty's if he then got injured!

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> What I have thought of him since he went to

> S**thampton. That he is a self publicising

> gobsh1te that has the media ( and a few brown

> envelopes) in his pocket. Teflon harry he should

> be called. :)

>


You are right of course. I did welcome himwhen he came to Saints even though he had come from the skates but turned against him as soon as he started openly critising the players in public (much the same as he is doing now). I still think is abject disinterest in entering the transfer market (when money was available) was a hint at his agenda at being at saints.


He may have skill at rallying players around him but he is a s**t coach.

Even if you go down this season we may not even get a chance to play you!

Norwich have "borrowed" Celtic striker Chris Killen for the rest of the season - hope he scores a few for you, he did not get a proper chance at Celtic.


Could Villa go top today - are Villa fans starting to dream of the title rather than a ch league place? who knows...if Celtic fans know Martin O'Neill, he'll be in it to win it.

I'm predicting a final four as follows:

1) Man U

2) Villa

3) Chelsea

4) liverpool....

Villa might finish 3rd if they quietly go about their business picking up wins but I think 2nd is unrealistic because it would take both Liverpool and Chelsea to implode. With the new pressure of top 4 becoming more an expectation I think ultimately they'd be very, very happy to just keep Arsenal at bay for 4th spot.
Not sure Liverpool and Chelsea would need to implode as such, Villa are right up there, it's not like they need the other 2 to drop many points if they can keep up the pace. Obviously I'd like to see them in 2nd behind Liverpool as champs, but I think that might be wishfull thinking ;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...