Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The pub was never very good and The Dulwich Estate have said that the lease still remains with Stonegate Estates.

Stonegate have been trying to get rid of their lease as it was on the market in 2012 but nobody wants it as a pub as it wasn't well used.

Being good in the 60s and 70s isn't a good enough reason to take a risk on it now. It was shit from 80s - 00s. Rubbish location, bad and overpriced food.


I hate to see any pub be closed for more flats, but I just can't see this being a successful pub again, and actually that stretch could probably do with a small supermaket type affair.


But yeah, Dulwich Estate are a bunch of bastards and there is no way at all they should be a charity.

I may of mentioned this before, but in a bid to ease parking around Lordship lane area the

Grove what ever it becomes with its large carpark would be ideal for a Park & Ride Scheme..


I have mentioned it before in fact. There you go. I've said it again..


DulwichFox

it's a good location, next to the entrance to the woods and Dulwich Park. It's got a huge garden which could be a big draw for famillies. it would make a good hotel / pub restaurant. Just because people didn't like it when it was a Harvester, doesn't mean it's not viable.

Hmmm.


Well we'll probably never know, as I doubt it'll ever reopen, but I honestly believe it would go unused and close again if someone took a chance on it.


Unless it was true that Wetherspoons were to close the Capitol and open there, I could see tat working. But that's not happening, so it'll probably be flats.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> it's a good location, next to the entrance to the

> woods and Dulwich Park. It's got a huge garden

> which could be a big draw for famillies.


That's if you want to risk life and limb crossing the road from the woods to the pub. Unless that junction is ever sorted out for pedestrians, it's a no-no.

It was a good location many years ago when you could drive to the pub.. That's why it has a vast car park.


People do not generally drive to the pub anymore..


Its not convenient for a family to walk or get buses to the venue. Especially in winter months..

There is far too much going in East Dulwich proper i.e. Lordship Lane to satisfy the majority of local residents.


Cannot see why people would want to stay in a hotel there. Dulwich is hardly a holiday destination and

with many people here thinking transport links to the West End and such not being ideal.


Would be nice to see a pub back there but cannot see it ever being viable. Most of the walkers in the woods

end up in the Dulwich Wood house but not more than a handful of those at weekends and even fewer during the week.

You can walk from the Grove to the Wood House without seeing a soul...


DulwichFox

I never liked it but we took out the inlaws there once and they loved it and it was very busy. My Father in Law wanted to try it as he saw it on the way to our house. I don't know if it was always that busy (and this was probably almost 10 years ago) but it seemed popular enough that night.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cannot see why people would want to stay in a

> hotel there. Dulwich is hardly a holiday

> destination and

> with many people here thinking transport links to

> the West End and such not being ideal.



I dunno, Dulwich has plenty of families who might not have the space to put up inlaws, and there are regular wedings at Dulwich College, Hornimans or the Gallery, so guests might need a place to stay. Dulwich has always lacked B&B options. But then again they're turning the dog in to a hotel, so maybe that ship has sailed.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've never found it particularly difficult to

> cross there I have to say.


Really? Coming from the woods, you can't see if traffic's whizzing round the corner on the South Circular and there's no pedestrian phase. This photo makes it clear how crazy it is to try to cross.


 

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It was a good location many years ago when you

> could drive to the pub.. That's why it has a vast

> car park.

>

> People do not generally drive to the pub

> anymore..

>

> Its not convenient for a family to walk or get

> buses to the venue. Especially in winter months..

>

> There is far too much going in East Dulwich

> proper i.e. Lordship Lane to satisfy the majority

> of local residents.

>

> Cannot see why people would want to stay in a

> hotel there. Dulwich is hardly a holiday

> destination and

> with many people here thinking transport links to

> the West End and such not being ideal.

>

> Would be nice to see a pub back there but cannot

> see it ever being viable. Most of the walkers in

> the woods

> end up in the Dulwich Wood house but not more

> than a handful of those at weekends and even fewer

> during the week.

> You can walk from the Grove to the Wood House

> without seeing a soul...

>

> DulwichFox



I agree with nearly all of this (you see, it can happen)

Did the Harvester shut down before the fire, or did the fire force it to close? I don't remember.


The reason I ask is that plenty of other Harvesters seem to work (i.e. lots of people like them and go to them). So if it's a good location, why didn't this one work?

The Harvester shut down as a Harvester first, was sold as a business I believe, refitted a bit and then reopened as the Grove Tavern. Shortly after the reopening as the Grove Tavern, the fire occurred in the kitchen/back area of the building and it was then closed as a business for good.

When it was converted into a Harvester, all the original fixtures and fittings were ripped out, completely ruining what had once been a lovely pub. I've many happy memories when I used it as a regular Friday night haunt as a teenager in the mid-70s. Those great long hot summers of '75 and '76 stick in the mind as we'd spend most of the time in the garden (where there was another bar) smoking spliff and tripping on acid. Occasionally, we'd walk up through the woods for a few jars up at The Wood House then maybe back to The Grove for last orders.


I think the pub/B&B option would be best to make it a workable pub again and I'm sure plenty of people would use it up this end, I know I would if the right people were to take it over (Prays for Beer Rebellion or Antic) but sadly it looks like Dulwich Estates have other ideas.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I stayed in a Travel Lodge the other night and

> went to a Harvester next door for breakfast.

> Cracking fry up for a fiver.


It is (IMO) a pretty shit fry-up, but as you say it only costs a fiver which is pretty hard to argue with. And that includes unlimited "continental" buffet too (i.e. jam and toast, and tinned mandarins).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...