Jump to content

Recommended Posts

if it doesn't float your boat, let it go.


Whoa PGC, I never even said a word about the course, I'd never heard of it. I was just saying that Noah can't have been 950 years old!


I wouldn't mind seeing one session of the course just out of interest, but the one time I went to All Saints, I have to say I found them a bit full on, and they freaked me out a bit. Good music though.


That was my first post on this thread, and I think you've kicked off at the wrong person to be honest.

Reading this thread is much like listening to the Archers. Leave it for a while and then come back, you havent missed anything as within a few minutes you can pick up whats going on as its much like what was going on the last time you looked.

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Reading this thread is much like listening to the

> Archers. Leave it for a while and then come back,

> you havent missed anything as within a few minutes

> you can pick up whats going on as its much like

> what was going on the last time you looked.


Yup


religion innit - when you are discussing soemthing that doesnt exist, there cant really be a satisfactory conclusion where everyone comes to an agreement

snorky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> religion innit - when you are discussing soemthing

> that doesnt exist, there cant really be a

> satisfactory conclusion where everyone comes to an

> agreement


Very true... although I can't say that I've ever noticed a "satisfactory conclusion" to any debate on this forum!

an article in The Guardian sums it up nicely for me:


Sir David Attenborough has revealed that he receives hate mail from viewers for failing to credit God in his documentaries. In an interview with this week's Radio Times about his latest documentary, on Charles Darwin and natural selection, the broadcaster said: "They tell me to burn in hell and good riddance."


Telling the magazine that he was asked why he did not give "credit" to God, Attenborough added: "They always mean beautiful things like hummingbirds. I always reply by saying that I think of a little child in east Africa with a worm burrowing through his eyeball. The worm cannot live in any other way, except by burrowing through eyeballs. I find that hard to reconcile with the notion of a divine and benevolent creator."


Attenborough went further in his opposition to creationism, saying it was "terrible" when it was taught alongside evolution as an alternative perspective. "It's like saying that two and two equals four, but if you wish to believe it, it could also be five ... Evolution is not a theory; it is a fact, every bit as much as the historical fact that William the Conqueror landed in 1066."


Attenborough, who attended the Wyggeston Grammar School for Boys in Leicester in the 1930s, said he was astonished at manifestations of Christian faith.


"It never really occurred to me to believe in God - and I had nothing to rebel against, my parents told me nothing whatsoever. But I do remember looking at my headmaster delivering a sermon, a classicist, extremely clever ... and thinking, he can't really believe all that, can he? How incredible!"


In 2002, Attenborough joined an effort by clerics and scientists to oppose the inclusion of creationism in the curriculum of state-funded independent schools receiving private sponsorship, such as the Emmanuel Schools Foundation.

"It's like saying that two and two equals four, but if you wish to believe it, it could also be five


Such a good way of putting it.


Teaching of creationism in schoolds is the one thing that I can't reconsile myself with. I was amazed the other day to hear on the radio that 60% of Americans believe in the biblical account of the creation. That is just scary!

blinder999 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> an article in The Guardian sums it up nicely for

> me:

>

>> Telling the magazine that he was asked why he did

> not give "credit" to God, Attenborough added:

> "They always mean beautiful things like

> hummingbirds. I always reply by saying that I

> think of a little child in east Africa with a worm

> burrowing through his eyeball. The worm cannot

> live in any other way, except by burrowing through

> eyeballs. I find that hard to reconcile with the

> notion of a divine and benevolent creator


xxxxxxxxxxx


Yes. It's also like when people give thanks and credit to God for the good things that happen to them/others, but don't seem to think that he (sorry, He) has anything to do with the bad things.


Or if someone is rescued alive from a disaster it's a miracle and due to God, especially if they prayed to be rescued, but the zillions who were killed are nothing to do with him/Him, even though it's a pretty safe bet many of them were praying to be rescued too.


Weird.

At school, RE isn't taught to convert. It's taught to educate people on other beliefs.


Sue


Nice comparative use of 1:Zillion there. Sometimes God puts people through difficult situations, and carries them through it so that they can witness to others.


If a madman cuts short someone else?s life, it's a disaster created by man at the cost of another man?s life. God could intervene, but God gave man the choice of free will to do as he pleases, from living a Christian life to denouncing the existing of God to "doing things my way".

Yeah but what if the victim is a Christian and has put his trust in God to help him through his life?


And what about Noah being 950 years old?????


I am normally strongly in the Christians corner on this forum, sticking up for people's right to believe, but stuff like what you have just written almost make me want to join the Sean, Mark, Snorky brigade!

For those of you who might have wondered why I'm not taking part in this thread, I'm afraid it simply because I'm chicken and can't face the snarling contempt and anger of the board. Sorry. To those of you, regardless of your views, who have stood up for respect, honesty, thinking, listening and tolerance and who have had the courage to say so, thanks.

Yes, although we've never talked about it in detail, I had a feeling we came from the same sort of starting point on religion.


And like you I would normally defend anyone's right to believe, but some of the views expressed here have reminded very strongly of the reasons I satrted to doubt, and eventually left, the church.

Keef,


Noah being 950 years old - why could it not have been possible for people to live longer back then than they can today? The world has deteriorated so much since the times of Noah. Matey who mentioned Attenborough ? maybe he can explain this better.


I don't see how someone?s view can change by what I had just said. Am I missing the point?


Annaj


I'm sorry this thread has had such an effect on you although I'm left wondering as to why you felt the need to congratulate me on something I had *clearly* not set out to do. Another close minded dig perhaps?

If anyone is seriously interested in finding out some answers to tough questions, you might want to have a look at a book by Amy Orr-Ewing called "Why Trust the Bible?" [iBSN 978-0-85111-993-9]


She lives in Peckham (good to support the locals), has theology degrees from Christ Church, Oxford & King's College, London and is a professional apologist.

Bizzy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Keef,

>

> Noah being 950 years old - why could it not have

> been possible for people to live longer back then

> than they can today? The world has deteriorated so

> much since the times of Noah. Matey who mentioned

> Attenborough ? maybe he can explain this better.

>

> I don't see how someone?s view can change by what

> I had just said. Am I missing the point?

>

> Annaj

>

> I'm sorry this thread has had such an effect on

> you although I'm left wondering as to why you felt

> the need to congratulate me on something I had

> *clearly* not set out to do. Another close minded

> dig perhaps?


aha


I see - an inabilty to chew down bollocks = closed mind


Noah - 100% fail


Keep on going- that Goebbles inspired propaganda machine that you are using seems to alientiang more people than it attracts

I think actually human's are move "advanced" now than they would have been then, and lifespans are vertainly longer now than they were say 500 years ago, so it's not outside the rhealms of possibility to suggest that a human wouldn't have made 100 let alone 950.


I am all for Christianality, and would NEVER question your right to believe in God (no one can PROVE s/he doesn't exist) and the Bible, but I do call in to question people taking literally old stories that are just NOT possible!


Please don't take this the wrong way, but to be honest, if I was on the fence, and open to being taken in to the fold, and someone started preaching that sort of thing to me, they would turn me straight off. I'd rather someone say, "of course someone couldn't have lived to 950, but the point is the story offers us ideas and moral suggestions", that might make me go along to see what it was all about.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...