Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Speaking of which...I was in Rocca again last night. It's bland-done-well. The food is only a tad above average (if that) but it has a decent buzz, is always busy and has super friendly staff which makes all the difference.


Plenty locals now having a cheeky beer outside at Cafe Rouge now too in the dog's absence.


I really hope they don't suck the soul from the Dog, clad it all in pastel painted tongue and groove and dish up generic M&B slop. But it's looking that way isn't it?

Sadly ALL refurbs by committee seem to go this way


Actually, i'm going to use the Allyen's Head as my 'pulse' or 'base line' of anticipation


By doing this i'm sure to avoid anything other than 'being there, present in the moment'


Maybe this way I can reboot my anticipation level to 'Dulwich Vanilla' on my Joy-O-Meter


Obviously i'll have to avoid Peckham or anywhere equally as spicy, else I blow a valve

I just hope they don't take down the beautiful ceilings in the main bar areas. The place had little atmosphere before any refurb, and the service was crap too. It relied on location as much as anything. Although I love the idea of this pub, it never quite lives upto expectations. Taking visitors there always starts with great anticipation and people commenting on how lovely it looks and what a great location etc but then after standing at the bar for a good 15 minutes before being served you realise it's not all that. Great shame. Needs to be more innovative. And for Christ sakes get some experienced bar staff who know their stuff.


Louisa.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To be fair, the Dog has never really had that much soul IMO.


Dunno. I always thought that it was one of the few pubs in the area that seemed to have a sort of authenticity.. an historic building pleasingly untouched by bland makeovers or cheap novelties. Yes the service was slow and the food was just plain bad, but it had a certain "pubiness" about it which I very much liked.

I've been going in there since I was 15. It used to be great. It was my local for many years and first port of call. The atmosphere was ruined when they took the booths out in the small end bar in the 80s and got rid of all the decent bar staff. Also they cut down on the bar staff and it was then that the waiting to be served for ages started and I looked elsewhere for a regular slurp and started to venture more into East Dulwich. It is still a nice place to sit out front when the sun is out and to watch the world go by though but I fear it will be become more stuffy once it turns into a hotel and whilst it is owned by M&B the food will always be crap.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > To be fair, the Dog has never really had that

> much soul IMO.

>

> Dunno. I always thought that it was one of the few

> pubs in the area that seemed to have a sort of

> authenticity.. an historic building pleasingly

> untouched by bland makeovers or cheap novelties.

> Yes the service was slow and the food was just

> plain bad, but it had a certain "pubiness" about

> it which I very much liked.



I know what you mean, and it is a lovely building. But I just never felt comfortable (in a literal sense) sitting in there. I've had some lovely times in there over the years, but something about it just never appealed to me.


Remember my sister working there (92/93) and it was always heaving back then (she used to serve the 15 year old me) and loads of the older Dulwich College boys amnd JAGS girls used to go there on a Friday night.

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Slow progress I'm hearing...plasterers that were

> scheduled to be in back in November are only just

> starting work now. It was an old property with

> little maintenance done over the past half century

> so wouldn't surprise me if it overruns by 6 months

> or so....the village is not quite the same without

> it is it?


Thinking of moving back to ED then MrB. We are still missing you.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Remember my sister working there (92/93) and it

> was always heaving back then (she used to serve

> the 15 year old me) and loads of the older Dulwich

> College boys amnd JAGS girls used to go there on a

> Friday night.


I have been in there in the past on a Friday night with a teacher from one of the schools and he was spotted by a number of his pupils who obviously being under drinking age looked a little embarrassed - he also felt slightly awkward I think.

  • 1 month later...
From what I've heard it could be as late as late summer 2016 but I wouldn't want to get your hopes up. And still The Grove Tavern and The Half Moon remain firmly closed too. Crap isn't it. Pull your finger out Dulwich Estates and get the other two back up and running.
  • 2 months later...

The way things are going we'll be lucky if The Dog will be open in time for New Year 2017. I was also unaware that Mitchell & Butler will still be in charge of the day to day running of the pub. That will mean the food will still be crap. Meanwhile, The Half Moon is still firmly closed as Dulwich Estates plans are to also turn the upstairs into an hotel which goes against the grain of what most people want for it to remain as a music entertainment venue.

Sadly, the Grove Tavern looks like is will never open its doors again as a pub. Absolute shambles.

M&B food is awful in my experience, and looking at the plans it looks like a hotel with additional restaurant/bar area as opposed to remaining a drinking hole first and foremost. What with Sainsbury setting up shop opposite, it looks like the village is about to be totally destroyed. What a sham.


Louisa.

It remains to be seen what the end result will be so we should probably wait before making judgment? That said, M&B's existing pub/accommodation brand Inn keepers lodge, has that whiff about it: https://www.innkeeperslodge.com/


This is a great site in a fantastic location and I can't help wondering why the DE hasn't chosen a quality operator to do it justice. The village has character but the commercial leasing policy veers towards the bland and risk averse. A real shame.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • Sent you a pm
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...