Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Driving through Brixton today I was reminded that around Brixton Market ?phantom? road humps have been painted on the road ? looking as if a white line had been painted round an area like our own mini humps (three in-line). I found myself moderating my driving as if the humps had been real, and wondered whether these phantom humps did generally moderate speeds etc.


If this does moderate driving behaviour it has the merit of doing so at minimal cost both in road-works and in consequential wear-and-tear on vehicles.


Whilst not suggesting that all our ED humps be replaced by phantom humps, I wonder whether some mixed economy of real and phantom humps might be introduced (assuming the Lambeth experience is positive about their moderating effects) ? thus reducing expenditure on roads whilst benefiting drivers through reduction of additional wear on tyres, reducing needs for re-tracking steering etc. As ?real? humps actually cause additional wear on roads (as well as having an implicit cost of their own) , such a plan would benefit both the public and private purse.


Of course, their effectiveness in moderating road speeds still needs to be demonstrated (if it hasn?t already been in Lambeth) ? but if the numbers of real humps on our roads can be reduced, whilst the road safety benefit of having humps is broadly maintained, this should be a win-win situation for ED.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/49413-phantom-road-humps/
Share on other sites

Speed bumps increase pollution/emissions as traffic travels in a lower gear using significantly more fuel...

They also increase noise by both traversing over the bumps and by using more engine revs than normal. Not to mention, braking and acceleration...


In France, in the last 20 years or so the policy has been to replace speed bumps by other alternatives... but sadly it is not the case here.

We spend a fortune resurfacing the roads to ensure that they are flat and smooth and then the same again putting bumps back in. I'm pretty sure (although admittedly, I can't evidence it) that speeding is just displaced by humps. You so often see van drivers (not sure why it's always van drivers, but anyway), leaving a 'bump zone' and really putting their foot down, which I'm sure is at least in part born out of the frustration bumps invoke.

I would add, as regards the downsides of speed humps, that large vehicles (i.e. skip lorries) that go over them at anything less than fractionally over 0mph cause consequental damage (by the force they hit the road) on adjacent properties; my garden wall has been badly damaged by vibrations of passing heavy traffic. In smaller roads with humps the vibration damage must be effecting not just garden walls but the houses themselves.


BUT - since humps have been put in my road, the numbers of accidents (and injury to pedestrians) has fallen - so clearly they are of benefit - I just wonder whether phantom humps (perhaps still with some real humps would be as effective safety wise?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Walking last Friday early evening anywhere near where the bottom end of Lordship Lane meets the Goose Green roundabout, one would have been directly confronted - as I was - with this scene: Outside the East Dulwich Tavern an impenetrable phalanx of pushing yobs, shouty louts and selfish yahoos pressed outward from the open doors of this establishment, past the curtilage (the land in front of and owned by the business), all across the public right of way, to the kerbside. This was the situation all the way along, end to end. I watched as passersby, old people, children, parents with buggies, people just going about their business, were forced by these booze-sucking bellowing scumbags onto the road - where, at that hour, traffic rushed endlessly off the roundabout. We have, I realised, somehow become so used to this revolting spectacles as to believe it to be inevitable. It is not. This is why I'm dropping this post. Enough really is enough. This roiling boozy blockade represents a total failure by all the responsible authorities - the licencing authority, for example - but most of all (yet once more, again, as ever), by Southwark Council. Two very different comparisons to give you some perspective: 1. The Kings Head pub on the corner of Albermarle and Stafford Streets, London SW1. Here too, patrons like to drink and chat outside on a warm evening - why should they not. But here, on the latter side a line marks the curtilage on the pavement. Drinkers remain, respectfully, in good order, within the line, watched, quietly and carefully, by a security guard. I wager good money this arrangement is a condition of this pub's licence. 2. The Blue Brick is a cafe in the quiet backstreets of East Dulwich, on the corners of Fellbrigg and Shawbury Roads. Until a few months ago, about half its covers were tables out on the pavement. They bothered nobody. Oh! But they extended all of several centimetres too far into the footpath, so into fearless action swang Southwark Council officers - and now these tables are gone. Result, eh? "Well you see," some wiseacre said to me, "There needs to be a complaint." Not actually true, but for sure this is all too often how local authorities get pushed to do what they should be doing. Hard to think why a complaint trumps, say (and god forbid!) a child being injured on the road. In which circumstance, of course!, Southwark would swing into noisy, virtue-signalling, belated action. But in any case let this post be considered a big, very definite COMPLAINT about this prolonged abuse of our public right of way. I invite readers who agree with me to add their voices. Oh, and all those wee local ward councillors might get off their chufties, defy their party managers, and actually help sort this scandal out. Thanks for reading, Lee Scoresby
    • Hi there, I saw that Google lists the park opening time as 7:30am, but I was wondering if it might actually open earlier than that - maybe anyone who’s out running early or passing by has noticed?  
    • We are thrilled to announce that Little Stars Creche in Dulwich will be opening its doors on 28th April and we would love to invite you and your little ones to an open day where you can meet our team and visit our wonderful setting.  Little Stars is a fun creative space for children aged 2 to 4 years to enjoy whilst parents and carers get some well needed time to catch up on life! We are so excited to bring this much-needed service to the community, and we want to thank all the wonderful parents and carers for participating in our recent survey. Your feedback was invaluable in shaping Little Stars and ensuring it meets the needs of local families. For full information about Little Stars and a detailed schedule please visit our webpage here: Little Stars Crèche We can’t wait to meet you and your little stars soon!
    • Avoid any 2nd hand vehicle with the Ford petrol 1.0 Ecoboost engine and the Petrol 1.2 PureTech engine that can be found in Peugeot, Citroen, Vauxhall.... (you need to mention price for advice)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...