Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Parked on double-yellows, obscuring sight-line: 'A double yellow line means that no parking is allowed at any time. Fixed-Penalty Notice (FPN) ?120.' (Southwark website)


Parked with engine running: Regulation 98 of the Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986: 'the engine must be switched off when stationary. FPN.'


Using hand-held device while engine is running: classed as 'driving' FPN ?100 and three penalty points.


No wonder the driver hot-footed it when I took this photo.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm no fan of these camera cars either, but... none of you have ever pulled up on a double yellow

> line for a couple of seconds to make a phone call or something?


If you did that while leaving the engine running, they can get you for using your mobile while driving AND parking on a double yellow!

Salsaboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Illegal parking by a camera car whilst in pursuit

> of illegal parking is not an offence. There is

> case law about it somewhere, just can't remember

> where.


I get that to some extent but if they are doing something that is deemed illegal due to it being potentially dangerous e.g using a hand held device with engine running (i.e deemed not to be fully in control of the vehicle) then surely there are only very few situations when that would be justifiable. I suspect this was not the case for southwark camera car driver.

Salsaboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Illegal parking by a camera car whilst in pursuit

> of illegal parking is not an offence. There is

> case law about it somewhere, just can't remember

> where.



If they're parked causing an obstruction, or in a dangerous position blocking sight-lines, for example, i'd say it is. I'm sure they're allowed to park on single lines, permit bays etc though.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh yeah... real dangerous. Lucky nobody was

> killed.


I didn't say it was dangerous but potentially dangerous. There could be all sorts of caveats in attempt to clarify every situation but then the law would become very complex.

We've been here before, several times. Traffic wardens or camera cars parked illegally, caught on camera. Nothing will be done. The council are hardly going to ticket one of their own vehicles.


The OP may possibly have him on a technicality, but complaining about someone pulling up and briefly using their phone with the engine running is trivial nit-picking, in reality it doesn't even warrant a slap on the wrist. Stopping by a junction on a double-yellow is more serious, but even then... what do you actually think Southwark will do? And Tessa Jowell? Seriously?

You are missing my point. I wasn't saying it should or should not be reported. Just querying the case law. If it has been argued to death then why bother contributing to the thread, particularly with sarcastic remarks? Are you in fact a southwark camera car driver?

My point is that a technical infringement isn't necessarily wrong/punishable. And also that council vehicles are not subject to the same restrictions as the rest of us, and there's no point pretending they are.


I'm contributing because to me this just looks like misguided revenge. I'm being sarcastic because it's in my nature. And also because, naturally, I am a southwark camera car driver.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We've been here before, several times. Traffic wardens or camera cars parked illegally, caught on

> camera. Nothing will be done. The council are hardly going to ticket one of their own vehicles.


Which is why I pointed out some of the infringements are police matters. They may not be so accommodating.

he's not quite on the junction - flush with the start of the pavement IMHO.


If he was a few feet back - would be worse.



Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We've been here before, several times. Traffic

> wardens or camera cars parked illegally, caught on

> camera. Nothing will be done. The council are

> hardly going to ticket one of their own vehicles.

>

> The OP may possibly have him on a technicality,

> but complaining about someone pulling up and

> briefly using their phone with the engine running

> is trivial nit-picking, in reality it doesn't even

> warrant a slap on the wrist. Stopping by a

> junction on a double-yellow is more serious, but

> even then... what do you actually think Southwark

> will do? And Tessa Jowell? Seriously?

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> he's not quite on the junction - flush with the

> start of the pavement IMHO.

>

> If he was a few feet back - would be worse.

>

>


He's blocking a sight-line down fellbrigg road. AND parked across a dropped kerb. There's another infringement and ?120 FPN.

Balance - An officer wearing a Southwark badge should not be doing anything that brings Southwark into disrepute. Having a slash in public does precisely that. You should have taken his registration and reported him.

Cue public pissing defenders.........

Salsaboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Illegal parking by a camera car whilst in pursuit

> of illegal parking is not an offence. There is

> case law about it somewhere, just can't remember

> where.



North Korea

looks like the same guy who spends his weekends on double yellow lines in Dulwich village - many pix have been taken of him - he refuses to speak to anyone who challenges him - is an arrogant man who refuses to believe he does not have the right to comply with the law - needs to lose his job! parking on double yellow lines to get people who may do the same- it is outrageous -

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Walking last Friday early evening anywhere near where the bottom end of Lordship Lane meets the Goose Green roundabout, one would have been directly confronted - as I was - with this scene: Outside the East Dulwich Tavern an impenetrable phalanx of pushing yobs, shouty louts and selfish yahoos pressed outward from the open doors of this establishment, past the curtilage (the land in front of and owned by the business), all across the public right of way, to the kerbside. This was the situation all the way along, end to end. I watched as passersby, old people, children, parents with buggies, people just going about their business, were forced by these booze-sucking bellowing scumbags onto the road - where, at that hour, traffic rushed endlessly off the roundabout. We have, I realised, somehow become so used to this revolting spectacles as to believe it to be inevitable. It is not. This is why I'm dropping this post. Enough really is enough. This roiling boozy blockade represents a total failure by all the responsible authorities - the licencing authority, for example - but most of all (yet once more, again, as ever), by Southwark Council. Two very different comparisons to give you some perspective: 1. The Kings Head pub on the corner of Albermarle and Stafford Streets, London SW1. Here too, patrons like to drink and chat outside on a warm evening - why should they not. But here, on the latter side a line marks the curtilage on the pavement. Drinkers remain, respectfully, in good order, within the line, watched, quietly and carefully, by a security guard. I wager good money this arrangement is a condition of this pub's licence. 2. The Blue Brick is a cafe in the quiet backstreets of East Dulwich, on the corners of Fellbrigg and Shawbury Roads. Until a few months ago, about half its covers were tables out on the pavement. They bothered nobody. Oh! But they extended all of several centimetres too far into the footpath, so into fearless action swang Southwark Council officers - and now these tables are gone. Result, eh? "Well you see," some wiseacre said to me, "There needs to be a complaint." Not actually true, but for sure this is all too often how local authorities get pushed to do what they should be doing. Hard to think why a complaint trumps, say (and god forbid!) a child being injured on the road. In which circumstance, of course!, Southwark would swing into noisy, virtue-signalling, belated action. But in any case let this post be considered a big, very definite COMPLAINT about this prolonged abuse of our public right of way. I invite readers who agree with me to add their voices. Oh, and all those wee local ward councillors might get off their chufties, defy their party managers, and actually help sort this scandal out. Thanks for reading, Lee Scoresby
    • Hi there, I saw that Google lists the park opening time as 7:30am, but I was wondering if it might actually open earlier than that - maybe anyone who’s out running early or passing by has noticed?  
    • We are thrilled to announce that Little Stars Creche in Dulwich will be opening its doors on 28th April and we would love to invite you and your little ones to an open day where you can meet our team and visit our wonderful setting.  Little Stars is a fun creative space for children aged 2 to 4 years to enjoy whilst parents and carers get some well needed time to catch up on life! We are so excited to bring this much-needed service to the community, and we want to thank all the wonderful parents and carers for participating in our recent survey. Your feedback was invaluable in shaping Little Stars and ensuring it meets the needs of local families. For full information about Little Stars and a detailed schedule please visit our webpage here: Little Stars Crèche We can’t wait to meet you and your little stars soon!
    • Avoid any 2nd hand vehicle with the Ford petrol 1.0 Ecoboost engine and the Petrol 1.2 PureTech engine that can be found in Peugeot, Citroen, Vauxhall.... (you need to mention price for advice)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...