Jump to content

Kid/hoodies..........I finally snapped!!!


Recommended Posts

I'm not proud of hitting a kid but today I finally had ENOUGH! I was on the bus a couple of hours ago and about 15 to 20 school kids got on listening to 50 pence or P Dudley or whoever and barged past this bloke with his little girl about to get off the bus and when he protested you can imagine their response. One of these 'people' sat in front of me whilst I was on the phone to work. I asked him to turn his music down and once again you can imagine his response and accused me of being a sex offender so I belted him round the back of the head with alarming force (I'm not going to give you an E-fit but I'm a big lad), it would be viewed as assault by the courts by no mistake. The little turd fell quiet and so did the rest of the bus and boy did it feel good. I didn't hang about either. Have any of you lot done anything like that?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4882-kidhoodiesi-finally-snapped/
Share on other sites

It's impossible to defend without sounding right-wing or "in my day - yadda yadda yadda" but being labelled a sex offender might have illicited a similar response from me.


Although slightly hyprocritical to complain about annoying passengers when you were on the phone to work. I hate people who do that!

There was a great thread on this very Subject on another Website recently.


General consensus was that the "youngins"(hope I got that right)_ DELIBERATELY often play their music loud(particularly in safe groups) to "test" their captive audience.

Naturally,most Londoners/LT Customers we being "oh-so-tolerant" and not wanting any bother/confrontation allow them to continue which thet fully realise and thrive on!

The remedy(which would appeal greatly to my fertile sense of the ridiculous) is to dance crazily RIGHT NEXT TO THEM to their music like you really dig it Man!:))(As CRAZY as possible)....sadly,for me,I fear that if I was ever in this situation I would watch their rudeness,listen to their rudeness and possibly even accept their rudeness and do NOTHING!

TO MY ETERNAL SHAME so speaking as someone who has NEVER laid a finger on anyone in 54 years(not even at School) then allow me to say

WELL DONE MY SON!!:)-D


p.s LUDICROUS comment about "the cripple"..absolutely ridiculous as one is attacking someone who is DELIBERATELY being obnoxious and the other(attacking the "cripple" is just an insane thought.(6)

Here it is from another Website from one of the respected elders of that Site on the 20/8/2008


"It's stressful enough travelling on Public Transport let alone some ignorant youth playing their MP3 or Ringtone outloud in Public.

The Youths that do that know that the majority of passengers would prefer not to have to listen to their Music. It gives them a sense of Power, as normally people do not complain for fear of ironically either the Law or the Lawlessness in our current society.

People who play thier music, will follow the arguement "Its mine and I can do what I want and I don't care if you like it or not" .

Depending on what mood I am in, I.e cannot be bothered or CAN be bothered. If I can be bothered I will do the classic A then B.

A: Ask the offender if they can turn their music down as it is distracting for fellow passengers.

Offender Option I : Often times will comply and some times innocently had not realised that the music was so loud.

Offender Option II: Gives a glum look and pretends not to hear the complaint or tells you they can do what they hell they like.

B: Up the ante: Stand very close the the offender and start DANCING TO THEIR MUSIC IN A VERY STUPID MANNER. At which point the Offender is now faced with any communters nightmare: Having to stand right next to the NUTTER! While dancing start clapping to their Music looking them in the FACE.


Offenders: Now start getting agitated and ask you to stop as you are now distrubting them. At which point you glare and say what is good for the goose is good for the gander.


Always works. Of course they size you up to see if it's worth pursuing the matter but a stern look usually tells them " Don't even go down THAT avenue" ."


p.s Interesting for me to return to that Site to realise I have a CRYSTAL BALL(!)....as I predicted in May,2005 that there would soon be a "Mixed-Raced" President of The USA::o

I HATE "bullies" with a passion.

I HATE "Anti-Social" people with an equal passion and when you have a group of bullies effectively saying

"We are going to take advantage of your collective tolerance and good nature,going to be as loud as possible and you know what there's NOTHING you can individually or collectively do about it! So sit there and suffer in silence you meek,compliant lot!"....its sooooo good that,just for once,there is a little retribution.


p.s. Shows what those on the "Atheist" thread know!

"Sometimes" there IS a "God!":))

...of course you can let the "Law" deal with it but seeing as only yesterday there was a disgusting London item on the news of the Rimg-Leader of a cruel,evil Dog-Fighting syndicate who was brought to justice and fined ?10,000? ?4,000? ?1,000 No! ?400 FOUR HUNDRED POUNDS ((!)) oh! and "Community Service":)) then there's not always a great deal of hope really,sometimes.

...to think of those loving Staffs,often cross-bred and used as "bait" for more vicious Staffs(already brutalised by the Leaders) and the fighting Staffs themselves(often abandoned and broken after their "career" it makes my blood boil but,at least,he got "Community Service" THAT WILL MAKE HIM THINK TWICE IN FUTURE,EH!!

(Note for TLS-Kindly stay on topic-Thank You!:))

I pee'd on a group of kids on the no 12 coming back form oxford street at about 9pm. I had never done anything like it before but it seemed a good idea at the time. They were completely stunned and spent the first few seconds trying to work out where the "rain" was coming from.

AllforNun Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I pee'd on a group of kids on the no 12 coming

> back form oxford street at about 9pm. I had never

> done anything like it before but it seemed a good

> idea at the time. They were completely stunned and

> spent the first few seconds trying to work out

> where the "rain" was coming from.


"Golden Showers"..THATS THE SPIRIT AFN ! and don't feel guilty if they dun nuffink,innit! Innit?

Round of applause BBW!!!! It is about time that someone made a stand, although I think you could of left yourself wide open to another passenger getting involved, or worse him and his mates turning on you. I have been in a similar situation and opted for the standing and dancing option, it REALLY bugs them and then if you start asking them about the music and getting it all wrong, like asking if "50 cent" is "half dollar" or "eminem" is "skittles" ... that sort of thing.

I am not that old, but I can remember going off to play with some friends of mine when I was about 10 and not telling my mum, and so she called the Police and they were looking for me all day, at the end of the day I came home and I got a clip round the ear from the Police sergent for wasting Police time and resources that day. That was about 20-ish years ago, and it was the same at school, if you stepped out of line you got physically punished

Now, kids of 5 and 6 are turning round to teachers and kicking, punching and biting among other things because there is no respect for them, and they wonder why borough councils pay for recruitment over in places like Austrailia and New Zealand each year.

wizardonwheels Wrote:

... and they wonder why borough councils pay for recruitment over in places like Austrailia and New Zealand each year.


Whats really worrying is that so many intelligent,skilled Professional people are emigrating to Oz/NZ/Canada to give their children "a better future" and to disstance themselves as far as possible from this type of behaviour.(Yes! It DOES happen Worldwide but its all about Scale and Proportion,surely.

Read so many threads on the Ex=Pat Site from really good,loving and helpful people who have given up on "Team GB" it saddens me.(5.5 Million since New Labour came in did I read? and by definition most departees must have some skills to be allowed permanent residence in those Countries.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • V interesting ArchieCarlos.   The UK is #1 at blocking and delaying investment (per the article I linked to above).  This means we have pretty much the lowest gross fixed capital formation in the developed world and the economic results are there for all to see (this led to the nihilistic political environment that enabled Brexit which made things even worse). Some of this blocking and delaying is well intentioned and aimed at a better outcome but much of it a smokescreen to prevent any investment at all and is a money-spinner for consultants and lawyers. According to the FT the new Kent tunnel has cost £1.2bn so far even before construction starts of which £800m has been on consultants, planning and legal fees.  359,080 pages of documentation!  This does not compare favourably with much more complex tunneling projects in countries like Norway or Germany.
    • Hello We've been let down by our surveyor who didn't look at the loft as they said their ladder wasn't tall enough - we're about to exchange but are keen to check the loft/roof before! Does anyone near to Melbourne Grove have a tall ladder we could borrow for an hour tomorrow around 3?   Thanks so much! This forum is the best, secured in 15 minutes! 
    • Trump is driving a wedge between the UK and EU. 
    • I am delighted to hear the development was approved.  In my opinion, the UK is building far too little housing. And unless we build on green belts, the only solution is to increase the density of our cities, which is exactly what this scheme achieves.  Where I'm from (France), planning is generally looser and in my home city it's common to see single dwellings being razed to make way for a 5-6 story block of flats, even in city centres. Does it change the character of the local area? For sure! But I don't see another way to provide the supply to meet demand and provide ample supply of housing for a growing population. My personal experience is that in the UK, there is a lot more time spent on consultations, on achieving a perfect outcome for everyone. This results in generally better and more harmonious building than in France, but it makes things slower and more costly, with the need to coordinate many consultants.  It's interesting to compare France and the UK as they have similar populations and population growth, with an economy centred on a huge capital city. When you look at the number of houses/flats built in France and the UK over the past 10 years, the result is pretty striking. # France UK Difference 2023 298,100 150,370 -147,730 2022 392,100 182,070 -210,030 2021 410,000 177,160 -232,840 2020 368,800 129,440 -239,360 2019 387,700 153,000 -234,700 2018 401,200 168,610 -232,590 2017 434,700 164,110 -270,590 2016 370,000 155,150 -214,850 2015 341,000 148,150 -192,850 2014 336,900 140,760 -196,140 2013 357,900 124,790 -233,110 2012 382,300 101,020 -281,280 Total 4,480,700 1,794,630 -2,686,070 Average 373,392 149,553 -223,839 When HS1 was built, the French engineers (it was built with the French high-speed signalling) were surprised at how Brits wanted to "gold-plate" everything. The UK arguably has the best, most effective, more reliable, more well-equipped high-speed line in the world, but we've only got 68 miles of it and it cost 2.5 times what it cost the French to build a line extension at the same time.  In my view, there's no magic wand: just deciding who will be the losers. In France, people in established neighbourhoods my lose out as they see them change dramatically, while the new entrants benefit from a much higher supply of housing (and thus cheaper housing). In the UK, we give greater priority to preserving the lifestyle and amenity of the established dwellers over the new entrants who lose out as the supply is choked and prices are higher. A final point of comparison would be the price per square foot of property in Greater Paris is £467 while in Greater London it's £667 - 30% cheaper!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...