Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The way I tend to favour to get into the West End is by catching the 185 to Oval tube station for the Northern line (to Leicester Sq or Goodge St or what-have-you with a quick change across the platform at Kennington), or continue on the bus for Vauxhall tube station for the Victoria line (to get to Oxford Circus).


The bus route from Camberwell Green to Oval is usually much faster that going up Walworth Rd towards Waterloo, and if I'm at a bus stop on LL I'll catch whichever bus comes first and change at Camberwell Green as all the buses that go up Camberwell Rd stop at Oval and Vauxhall stations (the 436, 36 and 185).


The advantage is also that I can use my Oyster, unlike getting the train in (though I will do that if I need to get somewhere on the Jubilee line). Bring on Oyster pay-as-you-go on the overland!


Annie, there was definitely a sign on the bus stop outside the post office on LL in the last week or so, but I can imagine that if one was rushing to jump on the bus as it was arriving, it could be missed. I think the reason signs aren't put in the buses themselves, which would be handy, as would a route map, is that buses are used for various routes and probably not always the same ones.




E

elizlondon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The way I tend to favour to get into the West End

> is by catching the 185 to Oval tube station for

> the Northern line (to Leicester Sq or Goodge St or

> what-have-you with a quick change across the

> platform at Kennington), or continue on the bus

> for Vauxhall tube station for the Victoria line

> (to get to Oxford Circus).

>


xxxxxx


The advantage of the 176 was that although it might have been a longer journey, you didn't have to change, just got on and looked out of the window or read the paper until you got off.


The new arrangements could be improved if the driver told you when you had reached the end of the journey :-S


I was on a 176 recently, it reached St Giles Circus but I had no idea that was the end of its route - I thought it had been diverted due to a demo in Trafalgar Square, as there seemed to be a lot of police vans and people about on the embankment.and there were diversion signs up.


It stopped there for ages but there was a wheelchair getting off and the ramp going up and down, with appropriate announcements over the loudspeaker (wheelchair ramp up, etc) and we thought it was due to that, as the engine was still running.


After about ten minutes the bus moved forward about - oh, a metre - and turned all the lights and engine off.


There were fifteen or so people on the upper deck, including us, all of whom had patiently sat there throughout the wheelchair manoeuvring, with no idea that the bus was actually going no further.


The driver claimed he'd told us - amazing then that not one of the people on the upper deck had heard him.


Had to have a nice sit down in Foyle's Jazz Cafe to recover :))

You're right Sue, sometimes it's nice to just jump on, sit down and not have to move til you reach your own stop (esp if you've been out for the night and your feet are sore!).


An announcement when the end of the route had been reached would definitely have been in order, but a little sit in Foyles sounds the perfect response :)




E

  • 2 weeks later...

btw, although the front of the bus shows it stops at Tottenham Court Road, the announcements inside the bus are still saying and displaying "176 to Oxford Circus"! Hmmmm, helpful, huh? :-S


Annie Wigman

Dancing Tree Creativity Coaching - La Sparkletta

Radiates Creative Sparkle

Especially late at night... :-$


The other night I got on at Penge, had the destination saying Tottenham Court Road, pressed me Oyster and the screen read Pawlynes Arms and the voice of God said Oxford Circus. It confused me so much I misjudged my stop (typical zoom zoom zoooooooooooooming of the bus) and ended up walking down some dark road in ED. I obviously made it home in one piece so really I shouldn't complain. :))

Dez Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bring back the Routemaster


I was actually on a routemaster yesterday, from Picadilly to Knightsbridge. They must keep some for standby duty. I can't work out what was supposed to be so great about them - or why boris wants to bring them back!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...