Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Quick update that might put a slightly different slant on this:-


1/ Ex-Wifey is married and has been for 3 years.

2/ They divorced 8 years ago not "3".

3/ Wifey1 persuaded her New Husband to have my M8 to their Wedding even though he had reservations,indeed my M8 says that he was so much part of "Ex-Wifeys" big new day that he "MC'd/Hosted the reception do as well as attended the Ceremony.

Indiepanda, I think you've misunderstood what I was trying to say.


I didn't mean that you would need to prove anything to your ex, just that your current partner should feel secure in the fact that you are marrying them, and if your ex is there, all they are going to see is you marrying someone else.


Hope that makes sense, I know what I mean, but not sure I'm putting it across.


As for the bragging bit, I was sort of joking, but I bet there are women out there who would take pleasure in it!

Don't worry Keef, I was being slighly mischievious in taking a slightly too literal interpretation of what you had said - I know you are the resident Mr Reasonable of the forum really.


And I'm inclined to agree there are some women out there who would like the bragging rights, I hope I don't end up ever feeling like that, but I probably shouldn't judge having not been there.

indiepanda Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As in she isn't going to see/talk to him for at

> least a week do you mean?


Yes indiepanda.

Which is a real pain imo as I've passed on the collective wisdom of this fine fora and(I think!) he accepts that he(or me) had not considered the salient point about the level of discomfiture that she would feel as Wifey1 knows that it was solely her decision for her not to come(remember Wifey1 had gone out of her way to gain entry for my M8 to go to her 2nd marriage! so feels particularly hurt) and so as Wifey2 realises she is "seen" as the "Bad Guy" and no Woman(in my experience) is going to be wanted to be seen in that light or be happy with it or tolerate it so the obvious answer is for her not to go to the Communal Couples Meal.

There's been a further development in that Wifey1/New Husband can't now go to the Communal Meal/Drinks as he has another engagement and they are both oblivious,totally unaware of the fact that Wifey2 won't be going.


Given that circumstance the way seems clear for:


1/ Wifey2 has had her "space" and makes contact.

2/ My M8 tells her that he can now understand her view(though he is irritated that she wouldn't admitin the first placeas that is the REAL reason why she does not want to attend the Communal Meal etc) and he apologies accordingly.

3/ She accepts it and they move on and "who knows" after the marriage she may feel happier and more relaxed about future gatherings if there is some time distance b4 the next one.


imo The longer she now leaves it to regain contact the worse it will be.

I forgot! there's now no reason for my M8 and Wifey2 not to go to Communal do but in the first couple of days he did contact her 2/3 times so,obviously,he has to respect her decision for "time and space" which is a pain as he wants to let her know that Wifey1 is not going to the Communal do!

Ted Max Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's an old plotline from Cold Feet, or perhaps

> Thirtysomething, isn't it? Where do I claim my

> prize?


Problem is both parties are currently getting Cold Feet about their future together...:'(

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Perhaps they should both have some space and a

> rethink,

>

> although the potential 'divorce move' seeems to

> have arrived a tad early,

>

> compared to most relationships I've known.


Sad but I guess it's much better to not go through with the wedding than make a terrible mistake.


Though I would have thought a proper heart to heart conversation was more useful than just "space". Without each other explaining how they really feel and what their intentions were, it so easy to end up completely misinterpreting each others actions, and then getting upset by the meaning each have placed on them.


If having had a proper talk about it, there's uncertainty about whether to carry on, then take the space then to think about it.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know you are the resident Mr Reasonable of the

> forum really.

>

> Og God, that may as well read "You are Mr boring"

> :-$


Sorry, that definately wasn't the way I meant it, you just come across as a chilled out and thoughtful sort of guy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...