Jump to content

Recommended Posts

anyone have any advice/info on a relative transferring their house to me and my brother?


want to find out options without paying for solicitor's fees at this point, although i am well aware that i need to see a solicitor for the actual transfer (i have PoA) and to firm up advice received to check and consider all options.


many thanks.

What sort of advice are you looking for? Tax? Legal?


Will the relative remain living there? Is their Estate likely to be near the IHT threshold?


Is it a gift or are you buying it? If it's a gift then you might have to apply to the Court of Protection despite having PoA, but I'm not a legal expert. I can give you some pointers on the tax issues with some more details.


There's also the Deprivation of Assets rules to think about in respect of care home fees in the future if that might be an issue.

Do you have POA for the relative transferring the property? There are 2 types of POA - one which a person who has mental capacity wishes for some reason or other for an attorney to manage certain aspects of their finances etc. This is usually done where someone is abroad for some time, or the person is physically not able to attend banks/financial institutions etc. Or if they want someone to set up a loan agreement etc. Not used so much now - tending to be for short term basis.


If you have a POA set up and that person no longer has the mental capacity to give instructions and understand the implications of various transaction - the POA is invalid and you will need to apply to the Courts of Protection to seek a Deputyship Order. If you act under a POA to deal with financial or property affairs - you could be classed as acting fraudently as the person (donor) does not have the mental capacity to issue instruction and understand the implications of the transaction.


If you have Enduring or Lasting Power of Attorney, once the donor lacks capacity to understand and manage their financial affairs including property, the EPA/LPA needs to be registered with the COP so that the attorney can act in the best interests of the donor. Records of all actions and expenditure need to be kept as COP can request oversight of accounts.


I would be very wary if you have LPA/EPA for your relative and you have the property transferred to you and your brother's name as this is a conflict of interest and could be classed as a criminal act should anyone query the transfer. This also could be considered under Safeguarding Adults guidelines and Social Services could be asked to investigate - they would also probably involve the police.


A transfer of property to another person, if made in the 7 years prior to that person requiring a care home, could also be classed a Deprivation of Assets and the Local Authority are within their rights to count that property as still belonging to your relative.


I know gifts of money are exempt from tax is under ?3000 pa.


If your relative remains in the property after it transferred to yourselves - there are other implications. Should a legal judgement be made against you and the property is required to sold to pay back some debts then your relative could be homeless.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello! I would be keen to hear from parents of secondary-school age in state schools of the cost of school trips overseas. Particularly interested in Kingsdale and Charter but all examples welcome. many thanks!
    • Or the government have it wrong. Certainly picking a fight with farmers, the very definition of working people, is probably not going to end well. The problem here is that Labour hung their hat on not taxing "working people" which was clearly the output of some awful focus group and clearly not the term they wanted to use. They failed to properly qualify what a working person is and it is now coming back to haunt them because the very definition of a working person is anyone who is, well, working and that covers a whole gamut of people and salaries. Don't pick a fight with farmers if you have stated you aren't going after working people because public opinion will be against you. Farmers are the backbone of any country and work so hard and yes, there are some that are incredibly well off but the majority are not and farming is a trade that gets handed down through the generations. And farmers will make their case very public in ways other groups won't.   Labour's communication has been awful but they got a free pass before the election because everyone was so focused on how awful the Tories were. But now they are in power and they are tripping themselves up because in leadership you need more than soundbites.   The "Son of a Toolmaker" is the type of thing that haunts politicians until the end of their career. Clearly someone decided to detach Keir from his grammar school, university (including Oxford), legal career, knight of the realm background. His face when everyone laughed when he mentioned it during one of the pre-election debates was a picture. He is the son of a toolmaker but you look a bit silly when people then say yes but your dad ran a tool-making company...   Coming into power on a ticket of "look how they have been behaving" and then behaving in many ways the Tories were has been a disaster for politicians of all parties. The clothing funding and access to no.10 was just a nightmare for them and in these days where today's newspaper is no longer tomorrow's chip paper the comments made about Trump (which I am sure most people can agree with) are just embarrassing.   Winter Fuel Tax has been a disaster. Yes, there are many pensioners who don't need it but those aren't going to be the ones talking to the media about how awful the winter is going to be and people only remember those shouting the loudest.   The budget was an interesting one. I was watching Theo Pathitis on TV and he had swung from the Tories to Labour ahead of the election and was talking about the impact of the Employer NI and you could tell that he was very carefully choosing his words as he knew how hard this was going to be on business and what the implications are but clearly didn't want to be left with egg on his face as he was telling everyone to vote Labour ahead of the election.   Labour were, understandably, happy to right the massive wave of Tory discontent and pre-election all of the world's ills were down to the Tories. The first speech Starmer gave after winning spoke nothing about the previous government but everything about global challenges that were going to make it tough. The challenge for Labour is they convinced people that every problem was down to the Tories and that removing them would solve everything but things are not as straight forward as that. I senses things changing when they announced the 22bn blackhole and many people said...but 9bn of that are based on decisions you made in relation to public sector pay rises. Labour are finding out, to their cost, that being in opposition is easy. Being in power is not.          
    • Adsl over copper is not obsolete, these are lines that are fed on exchange only and are still being installed now and will be for foreseeable, they are being changed to sotap which is basically no dial tone and will be voice over internet 
    • Russia is the aggressor.they did have a second rate army most of it gone.why is putin so deluded .in that Russia can use chinese  Iranian  north Korean missiles drones to attack unkraine civilians city's energy facilties.they have escalated the war  by using north Korean soldiers in combat.but putting saids you are not allowed to fight back using other country's weapons in Russia long range missiles.unkraine have proved they are no push over.give them all the long range missiles they want to hit in side Russia hard .
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...