Jump to content

Recommended Posts

And this from a man who does Bon Jovi covers.


Ha ha, for fun though gg, just for fun. Have never written anything like that


Just never really liked Nirvava, Lithium was a tune, but other than that...


Was never a Foo Fighters fan as such, but have liked more of their tunes than I did Nirvava's. "Best of you" is a great great track

I haven't listened to Nevermind in years, but I still get a rush when I hear any of the tracks in the radio (OK, but maybe not Teen Spirit any more). But it's struck a chord with a whole new generation. There are 14 year olds with Nirvana shirts, and Nevermind on their ipods. The production and mix are perfect to my ears... yeah, the band thought it was too polished, but to me, Bleach sounded like it was done on 4-track.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Doors. Singer photogenic enough I suppose, but

> listening to their records... imagine a

> pretentious leather trousered buffon stamping on a

> human face forever.


Maybe, but LA Woman is my favourite 'driving around at 2am in the morning and trying not to fall asleep' song of all time. Cranked up to 11 of course. Try it.

Again, overrated doesn't mean bad.


I'm not sure the Doors are overrated as I don't think many rate them that highly once they leave university.

LA Woman is however a top top tune.


We played Riders on the Storm at my mate's funeral as it was a song he loved (he died in a car crash 3 months after leaving uni, so we can forgive him th eimmature taste (good song mind if a tad pretentious)) and we were all in the church and the priest only picked the bit with "there's a killer in the road".


Never a more awkward silence heard in my life, I knew we should have stuck with Muddy Waters!!

But by Christ, you lot are so harsh - you write and perform an amazing, soulful, beautiful album such as Parachutes, packed with songs and sounds that could light the candles in a hundred churches or the electric, imaginative, dazzling portfolio of tracks that is OK, Computer!only to be judged by the Forum's jukebox jury that you are overrated. Cheers guys. Next you'll be telling me that Dido is no goddess.

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HonaloochieB Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Janis Joplin, sreechy and needed a bath.

>

> Maybe, but wshat about passion? She wasn't afraid

> to pour emotion into her performance - no matter

> how raw the feelings were.


I think the passion is crucial in songs and singers exhibit it in different ways, but histrionics leave me cold, and that was all I got from JJ.

citizenED Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But by Christ, you lot are so harsh - you write

> and perform an amazing, soulful, beautiful album

> such as Parachutes, packed with songs and sounds

> that could light the candles in a hundred churches

> or the electric, imaginative, dazzling portfolio

> of tracks that is OK, Computer!only to be judged

> by the Forum's jukebox jury that you are

> overrated. Cheers guys. Next you'll be telling me

> that Dido is no goddess.



Over-rated doesn't mean bad. For instance, I cited Nirvana, although I really liked them when they first appeared and still enjoy their work (in small doses), but they are clearly not as good as their legacy suggests.


Jimi Hendrix, he's another one, great guitarist, yes. Some good tunes, but for the most part pretty dull.

"Over-rated doesn't mean bad"


At last, someone understands.


AS it goes with Colplay I still wuite enjoy hearing the odd song from Parachutes appear on the radio, it's also connected with some good memories.

I really don't think Coldplay managed another good album and yet they remained the darlings of the media and more specifically the music press.


It's things like this that give rise to the dubious honour of being overrated. I think nirvanan nicely hit this thanks to a couple of great songs and an untimely suicide. Plus it still resonates with power to enyone in their youth at that time (I was perhaps a year or two too old for it to really resonate thus).

It's funny how the negative threads always last for much longer than any positive ones do! "Awful books" is still going strong whereas "Great Books" has died a death. Is it because people are generally more wary about stating what they like for fear of being shot down?

I'm not sure if 'ratings' are realistic, or even applicable here.


For example, I can appreciate the fact the Keef may not 'rate' Pixies (perhaps on account of some debilitating childhood ear infection which left him incapable of being able to discern 'really really good music') but the fact that they are 'highly rated' by countless others means that they are in fact 'highly rated' - just, as it happens, not by Keef.


In fact, if you were to remove the word 'rate' from this thread, all that would remain would be a list of bands or artists admired by large swathes of the population - just, as it happens, not by you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • V interesting ArchieCarlos.   The UK is #1 at blocking and delaying investment (per the article I linked to above).  This means we have pretty much the lowest gross fixed capital formation in the developed world and the economic results are there for all to see (this led to the nihilistic political environment that enabled Brexit which made things even worse). Some of this blocking and delaying is well intentioned and aimed at a better outcome but much of it a smokescreen to prevent any investment at all and is a money-spinner for consultants and lawyers. According to the FT the new Kent tunnel has cost £1.2bn so far even before construction starts of which £800m has been on consultants, planning and legal fees.  359,080 pages of documentation!  This does not compare favourably with much more complex tunneling projects in countries like Norway or Germany.
    • Hello We've been let down by our surveyor who didn't look at the loft as they said their ladder wasn't tall enough - we're about to exchange but are keen to check the loft/roof before! Does anyone near to Melbourne Grove have a tall ladder we could borrow for an hour tomorrow around 3?   Thanks so much!
    • Trump is driving a wedge between the UK and EU. 
    • I am delighted to hear the development was approved.  In my opinion, the UK is building far too little housing. And unless we build on green belts, the only solution is to increase the density of our cities, which is exactly what this scheme achieves.  Where I'm from (France), planning is generally looser and in my home city it's common to see single dwellings being razed to make way for a 5-6 story block of flats, even in city centres. Does it change the character of the local area? For sure! But I don't see another way to provide the supply to meet demand and provide ample supply of housing for a growing population. My personal experience is that in the UK, there is a lot more time spent on consultations, on achieving a perfect outcome for everyone. This results in generally better and more harmonious building than in France, but it makes things slower and more costly, with the need to coordinate many consultants.  It's interesting to compare France and the UK as they have similar populations and population growth, with an economy centred on a huge capital city. When you look at the number of houses/flats built in France and the UK over the past 10 years, the result is pretty striking. # France UK Difference 2023 298,100 150,370 -147,730 2022 392,100 182,070 -210,030 2021 410,000 177,160 -232,840 2020 368,800 129,440 -239,360 2019 387,700 153,000 -234,700 2018 401,200 168,610 -232,590 2017 434,700 164,110 -270,590 2016 370,000 155,150 -214,850 2015 341,000 148,150 -192,850 2014 336,900 140,760 -196,140 2013 357,900 124,790 -233,110 2012 382,300 101,020 -281,280 Total 4,480,700 1,794,630 -2,686,070 Average 373,392 149,553 -223,839 When HS1 was built, the French engineers (it was built with the French high-speed signalling) were surprised at how Brits wanted to "gold-plate" everything. The UK arguably has the best, most effective, more reliable, more well-equipped high-speed line in the world, but we've only got 68 miles of it and it cost 2.5 times what it cost the French to build a line extension at the same time.  In my view, there's no magic wand: just deciding who will be the losers. In France, people in established neighbourhoods my lose out as they see them change dramatically, while the new entrants benefit from a much higher supply of housing (and thus cheaper housing). In the UK, we give greater priority to preserving the lifestyle and amenity of the established dwellers over the new entrants who lose out as the supply is choked and prices are higher. A final point of comparison would be the price per square foot of property in Greater Paris is £467 while in Greater London it's £667 - 30% cheaper!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...